Login:
Password:

Microsoft Merges Internet and Desktop Search

By David Worthington, BetaNews

July 30, 2004, 10:01 PM

During its annual analyst meeting Microsoft Microsoft vice president Yusuf Mehdie demoed a new search engine that seeks out information beyond the Web and onto the hard drive. Mehdie showed off a prototype of the technology that was integrated into the MSN Toolbar add-on for Internet Explorer.

Microsoft's public disclosure of this new technology comes just days after Microsoft's MSN business unit launched a beta of its Newsbot, a cooperative venture with longtime partner MSNBC that scours through over 4,800 news sources. MSN is also in the process of developing its own algorithmic search engine to replace one licensed from Inktomi.

There is a multitude of reasons why Microsoft is so interested in search engine technology. In today's computing ecosystem massive storage is cheap, digital media is plentiful and the lines that segregated where the desktop ends and the Internet begins are dissolving. But there is one setback: finding contacts, pictures, e-mail, music and documents is increasingly difficult. Seeing this as an emerging problem that needs to be solved, solution providers including Google and Yahoo! are already seeking to act.

In the race to develop innovative new search technologies, Google and Yahoo! are no longer alone since Microsoft came to the realization that without an appropriate search mechanism it cannot keep up with the times and could miss out on opportunities for growth. So, in response to its late entry into the market, Microsoft has invested heavily in developing its own brand of search technologies - making it a high priority.

As a result, Google, the online search market leader, is widely believed to be public enemy number one in Redmond and Microsoft is devising a competitive strategy.

"Microsoft's responding to a threat from Google by building an application that takes advantage of Microsoft's presence in areas where Google has no presence--desktop apps, networks, the local e-mail store, and so on. But it's not pursuing the Netscape strategy--at least not yet. We'll see what Longhorn looks like," Directions on Microsoft Senior Analyst Matt Rosoff told BetaNews.

Longhorn, the highly anticipated next generation of Windows, will have search functions baked into its file system. Longhorn's storage service, code named WinFS, advanced the Windows file system so that it is an integrated store for relational data, data on files, and XML metadata. This opens the door for new ways to search within Windows to make it "search centric".

WinFS is codependent on future SQL Server and Visual Studio products called Yukon and Whidbey. Delays in these products are rumored to have caused Microsoft to scale back more ambitious plans for WinFS that take the service beyond individual desktops.

Critics of Microsoft have alleged including rich search technologies into Windows mirrors the integration strategy that was used to lock in the Internet Explorer Web browser as a de facto standard and topple Netscape.

"Even if Microsoft were pursuing the Netscape strategy to beat Google, I doubt this would attract U.S. regulators. According to the highest ruling authority in the DoJ case, there's nothing illegal about the Netscape strategy per se," said Rosoff. "In other words, Microsoft legally has the right to add a 'ham sandwich' to Windows (to quote Ballmer) as long as they don't strike deals with OEMs, IHVs, ISVs, and so on, to give unfair consideration to their ham sandwich in exchange for money or price cuts on Windows."

However, Rosoff did not rule out the possibility that upcoming Windows search technologies from Microsoft may attract the attention of regulators in Europe.

Whatever its implications, the technology currently showcased by Mehdi differs significantly from the "Netscape strategy" and Microsoft's practice of bundling Windows Media Player because it is not a part of Windows. Likewise, it does not expose any APIs that developers can use to build on top of. It is unknown whether or not a form of the technology will find its way into Longhorn.

A Microsoft spokesperson denied that it was gunning for its competitors, stating, "Our focus has been and will continue to be on building a search service that answers customer's questions. It's not about looking at competitors; it's about building great software for our customers."

The spokesperson continued, "MSN has updated its search user interface to enhance the online experience in response to overwhelming customer feedback. We are delivering customers an experience they have asked for. We believe the combination of a clean look that provides fast and easy access to the information people want will be a winner."

Representatives from Yahoo! and Google could not respond by press time.

Add a Comment (11 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By amitpagarwal

posted Nov 20, 2004 - 2:21 AM

Just saw the screenshots on Neowin.

Any clue, when the release would be available ?

Amit @ http://labnol.blogspot.com

Score: 0

By PC Rat

edited Aug 9, 2004 - 10:35 AM

Forget the Microsoft haters. Almost EVERYBODY uses Internet Explorer ~despite~ irrational parochial bias of an elite few !

The real issue of this story is whether anyone actually wants (or needs) to search their hard drive simultaneous with a search of the Internet.

And, of course, the answer is "no". It's another 'ingenious solution to a non-existent problem'. If people had what they were looking for on their hard drive THEY WOULDN'T BE SEARCHING THE WEB IN THE FIRST PLACE !

Microsoft spends years and millions of dollars to "invent" features nobody asks for. At this rate -in a decade- Microsoft shall be reduced to selling tunes on the Internet !

Microsoft better get with it, and start developing products which meets needs.

The Computer Rodent

Score: 0

By betateen

posted Jul 31, 2004 - 8:49 PM

"lines that segregated where the desktop ends and the Internet begins are dissolving."

no, try it this way

"lines that segregated where the desktop ends and the Internet begins are being eroded by Microsoft."

It doesn't really matter what MS integrates into IE as http://www.CERT.org warns against using IE at all.

http://getfirefox.com and get control of YOUR experience

Score: 0

By DJInsomniac

posted Aug 1, 2004 - 11:50 AM

Why would it what CERT.org says about IE? I've never even heard of, much less been to that site. It could say Firefox was bad, doesn't mean I have to believe it.

Score: 0

By alfamale

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 3:38 PM

First of all, what the hell does "Why would it what CERT.org says about IE?" mean? Secondly, why don't you GO to the site that you've never heard of so (hence the hyperlink in the previous comment) & educate yourself?

Score: 0

By wormeyman

posted Aug 1, 2004 - 4:38 AM

http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/why is another good firefox article

Score: 0

By BklynKid

posted Aug 1, 2004 - 9:25 PM

You are all wrong. IE and FireFox both suck. Opera is the superior to all!

Score: 0

By marcos_cu

posted Aug 2, 2004 - 4:42 AM

Duh, there are numerous sites that are not correctly rendered by Opera !!!!!!!!!!

Firefox is much better at rendering sites and contains no advertisements and doesn't cost 34 $.

Opera is at version 7.x while Firefox is not even at version 1.0 !

It's like compairing kitten to a cat and saying the cat is much better at catching mice! Ofcourse but wait till the kitten grows up. When the cat will be old and the kitten a young cat we will see who catches most mice ;-)

Score: 0

By BklynKid

edited Aug 2, 2004 - 3:23 PM

Well, as of right now (according to your interesting way of thinking), the old cat is catching more mice. ;)

Seriously though, I've been using Opera since version 5 and it's been getting better and better. Yea a couple sites don't render correctly, but I've seen a couple sites not render/work correctly in Mozilla either. Only IE is 100% compatible with everything out there, and IE is not even following standards, it's just that everyone is using it. Anyway, I gave FireFox a very generous and fair chance, and I just didn't like it. The tabs feel "slow" to me, the keyboiard shortcuts are all messed up, and I still have to see Mozilla/FireFox load pages faster than Opera. Bottom line, it's just not for me. I understand FireFox is customizable and all the missing "features" (or things I miss) from Opera could probably be added, but it's messy, plugins can conflict, and I simply don't have the time. That said, when I said Opera is superior it was an opinion, my opinion, just like how your opinion is that FireFox is better. So I say give everything a fair try (except IE, we all know that sucks) and see what works best for you.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted Aug 3, 2004 - 1:05 PM

Finally...at least someone is using Opera. I still use IE (see related comments about browser discussion on 'Microsoft plugs IE hole'), but if I had a choice between Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, and Firefox--Opera is the way to go.

Score: 0

By amitpagarwal

posted Dec 12, 2004 - 2:03 AM

Why are we getting to the Browser war when the news story is about integrating desktop and web search.

I guess neither Firefox nor Opera are yet in the desktop search arena.

Just my 0.02 cents

Amit @ http://labnol.blogspot.com

Score: 0