Login:
Password:

AOL Preps Image Makeover on AOL.com

By David Worthington and Nate Mook, BetaNews

June 21, 2005, 11:30 AM

New AOL.comAmerica Online, acknowledging that its subscriber base is declining, is relying on its Web presence to re-brand itself and dislodge customers' mental associations that it is nothing more than an ISP.

In an effort to earn a new reputation as a leading Internet destination, AOL will open up to a wider audience on the Web through AOL.com. The portal will re-launch in beta form on Tuesday, offering visitors free Web mail, exclusive audio and video content, and access to a number of AOL services previously available only to subscribers.

Since the beginning of 2005, AOL has fleshed out its open Web strategy one grain of sand at a time. The company began by revamping its search properties to be easier to use and locally relevant, then proceeded to open its AIM presence to partners and online communities. A new public face for the SingingFish media search engine followed, along with its own Web browser called AOL Explorer.

In April, AOL announced it was partnering with XM Satellite Radio to make available 130 of its radio stations and 20 XM stations for unlimited listening at no cost. More recently, AOL rolled out free Web mail for AIM users with 2 gigabytes of storage, and is now preparing to overhaul the AIM client to an open platform called Triton.

All of these elements have been brought together to form the new AOL.com, which is expected to officially go live in late July. The focus of the site will be on emerging trends, resulting in a juxtaposition of services that range from the familiar search features, to broadband multimedia content and integrated RSS feeds from around the Web.

A feature called LiveWeb further underscores the desire of AOL to reach out to the masses. AOL editors will scour the blogosphere for hot topics and link interesting content directly from AOL.com. The company hopes the new AOL.com will bring back the perception that it can be as modern as its rivals.

Despite the impression that AOL is simply a dial-up provider, the company draws nearly as many unique visitors across its properties each month as Web leader Yahoo. But an image makeover won't be an easy undertaking, AOL director of product marketing Kerry Parkins conceded to BetaNews.

"A lot of people have this perception of AOL being this declining dial up service and when everybody talks about AOL they say, 'all of the members are leaving,' and that's the way that they characterize our company," Parkins said. "The reality is that AOL has a very profitable and quickly growing Web business."

One of the things AOL is doing to aid this transition is taking advantage of new trends such as RSS, or really simple syndication, which the company says isn't actually that simple. AOL will apply to RSS its aptitude for making things easier with the launch of "My AOL" in July.

Continued. . .
1 | 2 | Next >>

Add a Comment (35 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By ChaosKitty

edited Sep 7, 2006 - 12:41 PM

I believe that AOL is one of the best things that ever happened to me. I like to spend time role playing in the chat rooms but I don't have the money to put into it every month, so I'm forced to use my friends' accounts as much as possible, or simply go without. AOL is unique in my opinion, and has introduced me to many great people that I never would have met otherwise. I love the way things change with each upgrade, and I'm excited at the possibility of a 10.0! Please, AOL! Put out 10.0!

Score: 0

By wrian

edited Aug 13, 2006 - 5:03 PM

i cant wait for the new aol 10 to come out ive been with aol fotr 5 yrs and they havent been anything wrong with them atall i think there the best company so far good luck aol

Score: 0

By ChanelD

edited Feb 21, 2006 - 12:09 AM

AOL is awesome! It gets better everyday!

Score: 0

By integrii

posted Aug 28, 2005 - 5:07 PM

WOW LOOK AT THAT NEW PAGE!!!!
I cant see one thing on that page that I would use. www.google.com/ig AOL is just more worthless every day. God I hate AOL.

Score: 0

By dannyme4362

edited Jul 2, 2005 - 9:22 PM

all i can say is aol is the best and maybe aol 10 shuld happen as aol 9 seems to have been around for a good few years now

Score: 0

By Moochman

edited Jun 21, 2005 - 5:35 PM

Okay, the web site will be viewable from any OS, but the client software (browser, radio, everything but Instant Messenger) is being developed exclusively for Windows. So as far as I know a lot of this great new content will be Windows-only.

Score: 0

By theAquaDex

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 10:11 PM

Why would you need images when you can access the real thing... Bravo BetaNews *yawn*

http://startpage.aol.com/beta.adp

For information on what's new and what to expect: http://channelevents.aol...hattoexpect/aolcom.html

Score: 0

By nate

posted Jun 23, 2005 - 7:07 PM

Originally, the beta site wasn't live.

Don't be a hater, it's unnecessary.

Score: 0

By crashoverride

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 6:10 PM

Good lord, abother remake? Of course it only works correctly in IE. AOL's is freaking bed with Microsoft. Their AOL client software is a shell for IE. The AOL Browser is also a shell and lets not forget Netscape Browser. I feel sorry for that pore firefox that's been made to coexist with IE in one shell.

Score: 0

By Kramy

edited Jun 22, 2005 - 4:39 AM

Hmm...I don't think I've seen a single positive comment from KSzostek yet. Mainly just "LOSER! MORON!" comments... usually aimed at me :/

Score: 0

By KSzostek

edited Jun 22, 2005 - 10:30 AM

Don't take it so personal KRAMY most of your comments are just bashes. You like to bash, just to bash! I hope this is more positive!

Score: 0

By Kramy

edited Jun 22, 2005 - 2:53 PM

I see...

Edit: Hey cool, you went back to old articles and wrote the exact same thing for several people(that will never bother going to old articles, btw). :P

Score: 0

By KSzostek

edited Jun 22, 2005 - 10:21 AM

Where do people like YOU get your facts?

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

edited Jun 21, 2005 - 9:18 PM

Well, THAT is a little uncalled for, especially since YOU fail to explain how his facts are wrong and/or why he is a loser. Although his facts may not be entirely accurate, that does not automatically make him a loser, and there is no evidence here to support that he is anything more than only slightly misinformed.

That being said, let's set the facts straight...

AOL is not in bed with Microsoft, quite the opposite really... I think they HATE Microsoft, which is why their software is always breaking Windows configurations, which in turn ticks people off and convinces them that it's Windows that's at fault.

AOL Client software is NOT a shell for anything... it's a bloated honk of manure that bundles the "AOL Browser" (an IE Shell). Netscape 7.2 and earlier were NOT shells for IE in any way shape or form, however, 8.0 is both a shell for IE *and* Firefox as well as a huge honk of bloat leftover from 7.x.

Score: 0

By nate

posted Jun 22, 2005 - 8:38 AM

Well if you're getting your facts straight, the AOL Client does not bundle the AOL Browser, which is available as an independent beta test and is not designed for AOL Client users.

Netscape 8 is also not based on version 7. It was a rewritten UI based on Firefox. Bloated for power users, maybe, but it doesn't have a "honk of bloat" leftover.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

edited Jun 23, 2005 - 8:38 AM

AOL Client has indeed always bundled an AOL Browser which has always been a customized, limited shell/skin for IE. This has been true since AOL 3.0 when it was first introduced.

The stand-alone AOL Explorer Browser is just a new effort to bring it out of the main client. Actually, it makes me wonder... what's with including AOL Explorer along with AIM... don't they already have a browser-client/instant-message program now called "AOL 9.0" ?

Score: 0

By crashoverride

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 10:14 PM

Ok, so I may have been a little misinformed about the AOL client. I guess I do need to clerify myself on the netscape side. I did know that prior to Netscape 8.0, Netscape was in no way a shell. Now I'm gonna try not to be as immature and rude as the first person that responded to me. I'm willing to admit my misinformed opinion and I apologize for anything I said that wasn't exactly accurate.

Score: 0

By KSzostek

edited Jun 22, 2005 - 11:09 AM

My Point exactly "Crashoverride" misinformed but needing to say something even when your comments are wrong. Get the facts straight before looking silly, like right now. Case closed!

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Jun 22, 2005 - 11:19 PM

Crash, please ignore the trolls... it's not his fault, afterall... I'm sure all of his problems with people are their(our) fault, lol.

Score: 0

By crashoverride

posted Jun 22, 2005 - 2:04 PM

Sometimes the only way to get your facts straight or to learn anything is to first make yourself look silly. Surely you're not suggesting that you always knew everything you know about AOL. That's simply not possible. That one be like saying you knew everything you know about a computer before ever using one.

Score: 0

By KSzostek

posted Jun 23, 2005 - 8:59 AM

I just don't make stupid comments when I'm not sure.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 3:19 PM

I'm not even sure the second-coming of Christ, Himself, could save the soul and repair the image of AOL... although, actually learning to write good software would be a good effort at trying...

Score: 0

By fewt

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 11:35 PM

LOL, for the second time this week we agree on something. ;-)

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

posted Jun 22, 2005 - 4:05 PM

Heh.. Yeah, something tells me it ain't that far off, concerniong the second-coming. All these pigs flying around, reports of a glacier forming in Lucifer's backyard, Mac switching to iNtel...

MSAOL wouldn't surprise me in the least right about now.

Score: 0

By funcheung

edited Jun 21, 2005 - 4:13 PM

nothin suprisin at all.. even worse than yayahoohoo

"rich" contents dun support browsers other than IE..

EDIT: i mean on windows & *nix

Score: 0

By nate

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 2:59 PM

Works fine in Firefox, and on a Mac.

Score: 0

By funcheung

edited Jun 21, 2005 - 4:04 PM

Nate,

try click on those CNN, MTV video clips.. My firefox (Windows XP) is not supported also..

it even wrongly identifies my Fedora Core 4 / Konqueror 3.4.1+ as Macintosh... though Apple's Safari browser is actually based on KDE Konqueror browser ("WebCore" rendering engine is based on "KHTML" rendering engine used by Konqueror)

[screenshot]

http://r1cky.com/aol.jpg

Score: 0

By Maestr0

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 5:48 PM

uh...isnt the site a beta?

Score: 0

By nate

edited Jun 21, 2005 - 4:00 PM

Well Linux support is a stretch, you can't even view QuickTime videos on Linux anyway. But that same exact clip worked fine for me on Mac OS X.

Score: 0

By fewt

posted Jun 22, 2005 - 9:29 AM

That's not entirely accurate. You can't view Quicktime with Quicktime for Linux because there isn't one, however all the major players will use the quicktime codec to play quicktime video on Linux.

Score: 0

By funcheung

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 4:10 PM

BTW, the only reason i install Linux / KDE is to use a KHTML browser :p

if someone releases a Windows port of Konqueror, or even Apple releases Safari for Windows, I will stick with my Windows XP before my next PC, probably a Mac

Score: 0

By TheRecklessWanderer

posted Jun 21, 2005 - 12:52 PM

New front cover, same crappy content.

Score: 0

By nate

edited Jun 21, 2005 - 1:06 PM

CNN, Time Warner, Time Magazine, music videos, live concerts including Live8, Warner Bros., HBO, Moviefone, CityGuide, MapQuest, etc.

Yeah, definitely crappy content. /sarcasm

Score: 0