Adopt a line of code: The makers of Miro have a unique funding model
By Angela Gunn | Published May 1, 2009, 8:02 PM
The multiplatform video downloader-and-viewer combo formerly known as Democracy Player is taking a cue from Sally Struthers and offering you, the Windows or Mac or Linux viewer at home, the opportunity to adopt a line of code in their software. "If enough of our users adopt lines of Miro code," says co-founder Nicholas Reville, "we can create an organization that is funded from the bottom-up and not dependent on the top-down."
Miro's parent organization, the Participatory Culture Foundation, has received grants for its work over the years from the Mozilla Foundation, the Open Source Application Foundation (Mitch Kapor's project), the Knight foundation, and similar celebrants of open source and open democracy. Times being what they are, the funding's not what it once was, and so in the wake of its recent Miro 2.0 release (which, according to Reville, tripled the product's user base) the PCF is thinking creatively about funding its creativity.
Miro itself combines a player, an RSS reader, and a BitTorrent client. And what does $4 get you? Your code will not write letters home telling you how it's doing in school, but you do get the actual line of code, its name (!) and picture (!!!), a blog widget for showing off the equivalent of a wallet photo, and your name in the credits. Those unfamiliar with reading code are also given the experience of trying to figure it out -- a similar process, your reporter understands, to raising a teenager.
I tried to stick with this software for a few months, but it was too crashy.
An interesting concept, but I don't like running crashy crap on my machines, other than Office, which I'm forced to.
Score: 0
|What the hell you're doing to Office to make it crash I have no idea.
Score: 0
|using a Mac?
Score: 0
|buggy software. At least the program is free. I've tried it and it's not entirely stable. I wasn't very impressed. Ended up with the Gom player. Not sure where Miro actually got my name, don't remember ever downloading the democracy player.
Score: 0
|This is actually kind of clever...in a pinko commie longhair kind of way. I just have one question: if my line of code creates a bug, can I return it for a better behaving one?
Score: -3
|So your opinion re the pinko-commieness of it all increases or decreases if i mention the thing i didn't in the article, which is that it's apparently all quite tax-deductible? As for code behaving badly, I personally had visions of some hapless "foster parent" getting called to a principal's office somewhere to explain why their little sweetie crashed the internets...
Score: -12
|Bloody kids; typing google in to google.
Score: 1
|"if my line of code creates a bug, can I return it for a better behaving one?"
And are you legally liable for any damages it may cause?
Also, tax deductability, aside from being largely a ruse unless you have a significant % of income in the form of documented deductions, is deductible ONLY on the difference above and beyond the value of the usability provided by the object of the deduction.
A cute device, but I don't see it gaining much traction beyond the initial novelty stage. And not much during the novelty stage except from those who are already fanboys of the program and as such, it begs the question.
Score: -13
|