Calif. Aims to End Wi-Fi 'Piggybacking'

Warning labels may soon appear on wireless Internet hardware if the California legislature has its way. Both houses passed a law known as the "Wi-Fi User Protection Bill," which would require makers of Wi-Fi cards and routers to warn users of the dangers of unsecured wireless networks.

Its backers applauded the law as a way to both end unauthorized sharing of wireless networks, and to secure computer users from outside threats. However, its detractors say such a law is unnecessary, with one analyst arguing that the problem is largely caused by "consumer idiocy."

The unauthorized use of a neighbor's unsecured wireless network is nick-named "piggybacking." While it may seem harmless, in many cases it is against the terms of service of most Internet service providers. Additionally, an unsecured wireless environment can also open computers using that network to possible security breaches.

With broadband becoming increasingly popular, and many homes containing more than one Internet-connected PC, Wi-Fi is a common option to easily connect up to the Internet. However, many inexperienced users are ignoring the security setup sections of the install, apparently not understanding the potential risks.

The new legislation aims to inform consumers of these risks. Manufacturers would be required to either place labels on the boxes, or place warnings in the setup software. Additionally, manufacturers could secure the networks by default or some other method to comply with the law.

Equipment sold after October 2007 would be required to comply with the new law. While it may seem that companies would generally be against such a law, a survey of Wi-Fi manufacturers shows support for it, including the Wi-Fi Alliance, an industry group that initially opposed the legislation.

Most say any steps to educate consumers about the need for network security would be positive for the industry.