EU to test Microsoft's revised proposal for Web browser ballot screen
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published October 7, 2009, 10:39 AM
Nearly ten weeks after Microsoft issued a proposal to the European Commission for a mechanism to let Windows users and installers choose the default Web browser they want to use during setup, the EC issued a statement this morning saying it likes Microsoft's basic idea, but will give the rest of the market an opportunity to weigh in with its opinions.
The EC statement admitted for the first time that Microsoft had submitted at least one "improved" version of its ballot screen concept since last July. "The improvements that Microsoft has made to its proposal since July would ensure that consumers could make a free and fully informed choice of Web browser," reads this morning's statement. "Microsoft has in particular agreed to present users with a first screen explaining what Web browsers are. 'Tell me more' buttons for each browser would also enable users to learn more about the web browser they may wish to install. The user experience would be better and the choice screen would better represent competing browser vendors. Finally, the proposed commitment would now be subject to a clause allowing the Commission to review it in the future to ensure that consumers would continue to have a genuine choice among browsers."
The new version of the ballot screen would be offered to all European users of current versions of Windows -- meaning XP, Vista, and now Windows 7 -- for a five-year period. This would apparently not mean that Microsoft would have to ship a unique "Windows 7 E" version for Europe, which was the company's original plan. But beginning with Windows 7 and on into the five-year period, OEMs would be given full options to install competitors' Web browsers and uninstall, or not install, Internet Explorer.

The EC admitted today it likes Microsoft's idea. But rather than simply give the company the go-ahead, it has decided that in the interests of ensuring competition among IE's competitors, it will be "market testing Microsoft's proposal in light of these requirements." Microsoft itself released a copy (PDF available here) of the EC's Market Test Notice, which opens up a one-month period starting today, during which, "the Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed commitments...Interested third parties are also asked to submit a non-confidential version of their comments, in which commercial secrets and other confidential passages are deleted and are replaced as required by a non-confidential summary or by the words 'commercial secrets' or 'confidential.'"
"Interested third parties" presently include many of IE's competitors which have signed on to participate in the case, including Opera Software, Firefox maker Mozilla, and Chrome maker Google.
Microsoft made copies of its improved pledge to the European Commission this morning. The crux of the pledge is actually not about the browser screen, but a pledge to consistently provide interoperability information about the protocols used by its key software -- not just Windows and IE, but also .NET Framework, Exchange Server, SharePoint, and Office (especially Outlook). Although the interoperability pledge was supposed to have been on a different track, Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith said today, the company is willing to implement this enhanced interoperability pledge the moment the EC signs off on the Web browser commitment.
"Microsoft's proposed undertaking will ensure that developers throughout the industry, including in the open source community, will have access to technical documentation to assist them in building products that work well with Microsoft products," said Smith. "Microsoft will also be required to support certain industry standards in its products and to fully document how these standards are supported. Microsoft's proposed undertaking will make available legally-binding warranties that would be offered to third parties."
Also included in that pledge is a promise to support "open, public standards" in its software, to the extent that it can. Here's how the company defines that:
"Microsoft shall provide support for applicable standards by either (i) implementing the required portions of the applicable standard that relates to functionality of the implementing product, or (ii) completely and accurately documenting instances where required portions of the applicable standard are not implemented or are implemented with variations. Microsoft shall make this documentation publicly available in a Timely Manner."
The newly proposed ballot screen does feature some obvious tweaks: First, it contains a bar of language selection buttons now familiar to many European residents. The selection of browsers is now in alphabetical order by manufacturer, so Apple Safari appears first and Opera last. There's also a notice saying, "Please Note: The Browser Ballot update unpinned Windows Internet Explorer from your taskbar," which indicates that this screen applies to Windows 7, but also that the update -- which arrives on users' computers through the Windows Update mechanism -- takes initial steps unilaterally to unregister Internet Explorer as the user's default browser.
But at least in this mockup, there is one element which may continue to prompt criticism from the EC's market testers: the fact that the ballot screen appears in Internet Explorer, complete with its logo in the upper-left corner -- which some have said implies a preference on the part of Microsoft. In its revised pledge, Microsoft states, "Nothing in the design and implementation of the Ballot Screen" can be construed to favor Microsoft, although it's arguable that since one needs a Web browser to see the ballot screen, it's impossible to turn off the "Internet Explorer-ness" of IE.
The Ballot Screen Update would be flagged as "Important" on Vista and Windows 7, and "High Priority" on Windows XP. Once downloaded, it would give the user an opportunity to execute it now or later; and if the user chooses later, it will install a shortcut on the desktop.
While only five browsers appear in Microsoft's proposed design, the company acknowledges that number could rise: "The Ballot Screen will be populated with the 12 most widely-used Web browsers that run on Windows based on usage share in the EEA as measured semi-annually by a source commonly agreed between Microsoft and the European Commission...In addition, if a browser's usage share is among the top 12, but that browser is no longer actively offered by its vendor, that browser will not be included in the Ballot Screen."
In his statement this morning, Brad Smith concluded, "As we've said before, the steps described above will require significant change within Microsoft. We believe that these are important steps we should take in order to resolve the Commission's competition law concerns. Today is an important day. Although the European Commission has not made its final decision, today's news is a major step forward, and we're hopeful this will help move us towards closure to the past and the building of a new foundation for the future."
The EC's call for a market test comes just one day after something resembling an alternative ballot screen emerged from Google Labs, ostensibly as a response to a marketing video depicting ordinary folks as ignorant of the difference between a Web browser and an operating system.
For heavens sake Microsoft, tell the EU where to go!!! They have NO right, in MY opinion, to tell you what you can and can't include in YOUR operating system! Ford will be told they can't sell their cars with a Ford engine in it next!!!
How on earth is this anti-competitive? I still have the choice to install whatever browser I want at NO extra cost to me! Come on Microsoft, I still believe in you! I live in the UK and pre-ordered back in July at a very good price. All I want is that it works out-the-box!
Score: 0
|EU idiots. As your prophet for all technology matters I hereby outline MS's secret plan for the EU:
1. Release many more force-fed (windows updates) IE updates (Service Packs) that'll have a pre-checked mark: "make IE your default browser".
2. Release many more Windows Live Messenger force-fed updates (on software startup) that'll have a pre-checked mark: "make IE your default browser".
3. Spend a billion bucks on commercial-grade software, such as Picasa-clone, True Image clone, Babylon clone, Nero clone, SnagIt clone, VNC clone, Backup/synching software, you get the drift... ...give them away for free ...and have a pre-checked mark: "make IE your default browser".
Some of these proggies can be engineered to run from a web browser interface, just so you'll have IE in your face all the time, with the purpose of you getting exposed to its interface and getting familiarized with new features of new IE versions as they come along... That way you don't base your opinion against the browser due to limitations/problems you've had with older versions...
Score: -2
|The ballot screen is running in internet explorer already.....
So it's already there... M$ stickin' it to 'em!!!
Score: 0
|"While only five browsers appear in Microsoft's proposed design, the company acknowledges that number could rise: "The Ballot Screen will be populated with the 12 most widely-used Web browsers..."
Is it possible that there already are 12 browsers on the ballot screen, with the 5 most popular being shown first?
Look closely at the screenshot and notice the horizontal scroll bar.
Score: 3
|Mod up on this one. Good eye.
Score: 0
|Opera should be the dead last one on the ballot screen....browser #12.
Score: 0
|Well, they're in alphabetical order. Do you know of seven Windows-based browsers whose names fall after "Opera?"
-SF3
Score: 0
|It was just an observation. The scroll bar must serve *some* purpose, and based on the size of the scroll bar in relation to the number of browsers already shown, there clearly seems to be room for exactly seven other selections.
Perhaps a compromise was made that allowed for a certain number (in this case, five) of the most popular browsers to be shown first. Maybe the market share of the sixth browser choice was nowhere near the market share of the fifth, which is why they chose to present the user with five.
Naturally, of the ones that were immediately visible, a decision was made to list them alphabetically according to company name. Sure, they could have opted for alphabetically by browser name (which still would have placed Internet Explorer in the middle), but then Apple would have fussed.
Lesser of two evils, I think.
Score: 0
|Wow, finally Microsoft are listening to its users, and not try to monopolize... Somethings bound to go wrong with this somewhere.
Score: -2
|They're not monopolizing in the first place by including IE. Do you consider every other OS available to be monopolizing?
Score: 1
|I don’t think it’s fair that it uses IE for the ballot screen. Why does it not let the user chose their own browser when choosing a browsers...
Also, no option for telnet? you can use telnet to browse the internet :) mmm but what telnet client would you use... we would need a ballot for that to..
Score: 0
|From another article: "Finally, the proposed commitment would now be subject to a clause allowing the Commission to review it in the future to ensure that consumers would continue to have a genuine choice among browsers."
So basically they are saying if Internet Explorer's usage has not dropped significantly in comparison to rival browsers gaining then they will imply that the ballot screen does not work - regardless of whether consumers prefer IE or not.
Maybe they are suggesting that when they force IE down to not being in the top 12 browsers they won’t be able to list it on the ballot screen!!!! :-O
The EC are a joke and will be forcing the features Microsoft are allowed to put in their own browser to comply with "open standards".
Instead of allowing for innovative practices they could potentially be stopping it.
Score: 1
|"f Internet Explorer's usage has not dropped significantly in comparison to rival browsers gaining then they will imply that the ballot screen does not work"
This has been the goal since they started this circus of stupid. The only way they could save any face on this, IMO, is to force all OS vendors to tie into this "ballot screen" browser choice BS.
...or just come out and say, "We were just joking. We're not really this stupid folks."
Score: 0
|"...or just come out and say, 'We were just joking. We're not really this stupid folks.'"
Lol, that would be the smart thing to do
"Instead of allowing for innovative practices they could potentially be stopping it."
I hadn't thought of that but that really is true when you think about it...unless Microsoft did the proper thing with the ballot screen, of course (having IE along with 11 unheard of, very basic browsers).
Score: 0
|"Wait, Internet Exploder is in the middle, so attention will be drawn there." "We could put it on the end." "Which end?" "The End? That will draw attention there. How about in the middle?" "Maybe, we should have six browsers so we can hide it between the middle and the end." "Seven choices might help." :-D
Score: 1
|They could randomly shuffle the choices every time it runs.
Score: 1
|Let's not get started on pseudo random number generator algorithms. That could hold up the process for months.
Score: 0
|The EC's stupidity continues to amaze.
Score: 2
|I agree can we not find WMD's there & nuke 'em?
Score: -2
|LOL, yeah, I hear there's a WMD inside the EC's headquarters ;)
Score: -1
|"but rather than simply give the company the go-ahead, it has decided that in the interests of ensuring competition among IE's competitors, it will be "market testing Microsoft's proposal in light of these requirements."
Translation: If the majority of users in the "test" choose IE, the test will be considered a failure.
Score: 5
|I am glad that I don't live in EU any more.
Score: 5
|Me too!
I'm tired with those EU retard fascists.
Score: 2
|