Login:
Password:

ICQ, Others Back New U3 USB Standard

By David Worthington and Nate Mook, BetaNews

January 7, 2005, 8:00 AM

Flash storage manufacturers SanDisk and M-Systems are slated to announce Friday at CES a new USB standard called U3, which enables users to carry, store and launch applications directly from a USB flash drive without installation. ICQ will be one of the first adopters of the platform, and the instant messaging software will come enbedded on devices from participating vendors.

America Online's ICQ U3 edition software will offer core messaging functionality and presence awareness, as well as additional communications tools and customization options - instantly accessible by simply connecting a USB drive.

Corel, McAfee and Checkpoint's Zone Labs have also said they will endorse the standard.

Microsoft, however, is conspicuously missing from U3 alliance's list of endorsing companies. Citing security concerns, Microsoft plans to add an administrative interface to Longhorn that sets policy for USB devices. Windows XP Service Pack 2 already has such functionality, but without an interface. The company has not yet said whether it intends to support U3 compatible devices.

Jupiter Research senior analyst Joe Wilcox addressed the related security questions, saying, "Companies already have reason to worry about lost or stolen laptop computers. Would any reasonable IT manager risk sensitive applications or data on a tiny USB dongle that could be easily lost? Then there is computer security. Sure, U3 may promise no permanent, local installation, but spyware creates perceived risk when working with software from unknown or untrusted sources."

In the 2003 Touchtone Entertainment film "The Recruit," a rogue agent of the Central Intelligence Agency managed to bypass the US Military's National Security Systems (CNSS) standards and covertly glean sensitive data from the agency's computers by using a simple USB storage device that was concealed in a coffee mug.

Although "The Recruit" was just a movie, it serves as an example of the types of threats organizations may face from devices ranging from USB hard drives and key-chain drives, to portable music players, media smart cards and digital cameras.

Despite the risk that portable USB storage devices could pose, Jupiter's Wilcox projects that there will be specific usage scenarios for U3 devices. "Some limited scenarios that make sense: Distribution of educational material, where the application runs from the USB device rather than forcing installation of a program to be used only a few times; try-and-buy software, where shareware applications ship on promotional or store-bought USB keychain drives; or secure-PC software residing on a USB dongle required to access a computer."

Aside from potential security concerns, consumer interest in U3 devices is also unclear. Iomega, once famous for its ubiquitous Zip drives, previously created a similar platform called Active Disk to reinvigorate its ailing product lines. However, the technology failed to catch on as disks were too expensive for users to dedicate to a single application.

But an AOL spokesperson said U3 devices will be useful for consumers, suggesting that an ICQ-laden USB drive could be helpful while traveling to hotels that have a limited set of applications installed on public computers. ICQ already offers a Web-based client, however, as does AOL Instant Messenger, which does not currently support the U3 standard.

The U3 edition of ICQ will be available to users in one of two ways, according to the company: Users can buy the software pre-loaded or, in absense of a pre-loaded key, they can download it.

Add a Comment (13 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By gael_gwapo

edited May 10, 2006 - 10:57 PM

is there any way for those who already own a usb flash drive to install it with u3 smart drive?

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Jan 8, 2005 - 6:12 AM

This sounds like it has massive security implications. Like bluetooth, I'll be staying far away from this one.

Score: 0

By qhobbes

posted Jan 9, 2005 - 6:31 AM

As a pc audio junkie and gamer, I'd love to see Winamp or Foobar run off a usb drive with no install (I know you can do foobar off cd, so you probably aready can on usb) or have game companies re-package old games on them. imageine plug-and-play c&c or quake

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Jan 10, 2005 - 12:33 AM

Quake I-III already is plug and play, it requires no installation and you just start an executable to start it. (i.e. burn the installed directory to a CDR.)

Why is user interaction important? Because we don't just run files off random media. This is how viruses propogate, this is how DRM gets installed, etc.

Score: 0

By shortasslabrat

posted Jan 7, 2005 - 6:21 PM

I think what most people are forgetting is that most (if not all) removeable storage devices fail after a few million read/write ops. This may seem like a large amount, but there are a lot of applications which dont cache data in RAM and instead simply read/write from storage as neccesary.

A standard which reads the required files and caches them ALL in RAM or creates a temporary copy on HDD which is securely erased (to DOD standards) after use would eliminate this problem.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted Jan 8, 2005 - 2:03 PM

Right on! Anybody noticed that when you open readme.doc with MS Word (just an example, people) that an extra 'hidden' file named ~$eadme.doc shows up? So if you ever open up an MS word file on removable media it WRITES to the disk, and by default Word updates this file every 10 minutes! This is also why I hate leaving MS apps open just sitting there because they usually don't just sit there. The only way to fix this is by somehow making the computer think that the storage device is "read only" so it writes the temp info to your default temp folder (eg C:\WINDOWS\TEMP).

Score: 0

By hollins

posted Jan 9, 2005 - 5:26 PM

Current flash drives can handle around one million rewrite cycles. If you do the math, you'll find that applications saving backup copies of your work every ten minutes will not have an appreciable effect on the life expectancy of your drive. You'll be wanting a higher-capacity, faster drive before it wears out. You do need to look out for disk-intensive apps, though, and this is why portable firefox and portable thunderbird disable some features by default (such as disk caching, history information and the junk mail controls database). If I'm working on a lot of files, I drag the directory to the desktop and work from those, simply to speed up access times.

Flash drives have become a commodity item, with 1GB drives available for $60. I view them as an important tool that I use freely, with a little bit of diligence. And naturally, any portable storage solution should be backed up regularly.

Score: 0

By Portal3

posted Jan 8, 2005 - 6:13 AM

I don't really like to run Web Browsers, IRC Clients, P2P Clients or any other application alike that require a lot of temporary HDD space. In this case it would be on the USB Flash Drive. I've already had my 256MB Flash Disk become corrupted after a few hundred reads and appear as 297GB on FAT and NTFS systems. If a user has the permissions to run an application off their USB Drive then I don't see why they can't just copy it to the computer and run it from that (ie: use the USB Drive as a storage device and a computer for managing the data). If you don't have the permissions to run personal programs on a work computer then I don't see why someone should go behind the companies back and use USB.

Score: 0

By marcos_cu

posted Jan 7, 2005 - 4:04 PM

Miranda, a "self-contained" IM application, not only already does ICQ, but AIM, MSN, Jabber, IRC, etc. I've been using it for months on a thumb drive.

Maybe applications like ICQ could cut down on the needless bloat, and focus making their apps work more like Miranda...instead of developing yet another "standard" with a catchy name.

Score: 0

By hollins

posted Jan 7, 2005 - 11:33 AM

Applications can already be run from USB drives, and there are a number of apps packaged to be run from portable storage. If the program is self-contained to a single folder and doesn't need an installer that adds system dlls or make registry changes, then it usually can be run from a usb drive.

For some examples, google Portable Firefox or EssentialPIM.

Score: 0

By nate

posted Jan 7, 2005 - 12:13 PM

The difference is that there is a standard being proposed on how these applications should specifically function. Maybe they are self contained, but some may leave registry keys behind or other data on the host system. Right now, it's just up to the developer as to how the portable program should work.

Score: 0

By hollins

posted Jan 7, 2005 - 12:49 PM

If an application is portable, it shouldn't need to leave anything on the host system, as is true for the three or four portable apps I use regularly. I have a hard time evisioning any persistent information that a portable app would be required to store in the registry. Frankly, application developers use registry keys way too much as it is, much like they tend to install every library as a system file, even though no other application will ever use them. I may be biased, though. I've hated the registry from the start. I want to know everything that's going on, which is one thing I miss from older, less capable OSes, in which everything related to an application was in the same directory.

Regardless, this seems like a meaningless announcement to promote a few new software releases.

Score: 0