Login:
Password:

Intel Builds New Laser Based Processor

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

September 18, 2006, 4:16 PM

UPDATED Researchers with the University of California at Santa Barbara, working in conjunction with Intel, announced Monday the next step in their joint plans to produce an entirely solid-state photonic processor assembly - a chip which processes data as light waves, without the need for microscopic, yet movable, parts.

The last major hurdle to being able to produce a fully fabricated, solid-state optical processor using on-board lasers involved the bonding process, it turned out.

Intel’s goal, stated today, is to be able to mass-produce a terabit-per-second optical networking processor chip. Though the company was at first unwilling to set a timeline, Dr. Mario Paniccia, director of Intel’s Photonics Technology Lab, today accepted a five- to ten-year timeframe, when finally pinned down by Insight64 analyst Nathan Brookwood during a conference call today that originated from a photonics conference in Hawaii.

Intel announced last November, along with the UCSB team, that it had developed a recipe for a ceramic material based on indium phosphide, that could produce a monochromatic wavelength of laser light when electricity is applied to it, and could also be produced as a wafer that bonds to a silicon substrate. That major development eliminated the need for movable gratings that, in silicon wafers produced since 2002, refract laser light from a multiple-wavelength source, so that a single wavelength could emerge.

A single-wavelength light source is critical, because modulations to that beam of infra-red light will be interpreted as data, so it needs to be a simple and regular as possible.

As Intel’s and the University of California at Santa Barbara’s lead engineers explained in a conference call from Hawaii earlier this afternoon, indium phosphide was chosen because it emits light predictably at regular wavelengths when voltage is applied to it. It’s obviously not silicon nor a silicate, so if silicon – obviously, Intel’s specialty – is to be used to guide light produced by an indium phosphide laser, there needs to be some way to offload the light from the laser onto the waveguide. In previous prototypes, this was done using moving parts, which can’t be expected to work in a production environment.

With a novel bonding process called evanescent coupling that takes place between the indium phosphide layer and the silicon waveguide layer, the surfaces of both layers are coated with an oxygen plasma. This causes both surfaces to oxidize, forming what Intel is calling a “glass glue.” When both oxidized surfaces are joined together under 300-degrees Celsius heat (which is half as hot as for other bonding processes), they create a transparent seal about 25 atoms thick, through which light from the laser is handed off to the silicon waveguide. This solves the need for active coupling devices, which would in effect use microscopic mirrors to pull off the same feat.

“We call it a quest to silconize photonics,” said Dr. Paniccia, “and there’s essentially six building blocks that you need to drive [it]: One, you need a light source to enable light into the chip. You need a way to guide the light – route it, split it, couple it, get it in and out of the chip efficiently. You need a way to modulate the data, to encode optical bits. You need a way to photodetect the light, and eventually convert the photons back to electrons. And even if you can build these devices, you still need a way to enable low-cost, high-volume assembly technology. Lastly, you need intelligence—you need the electronics to drive the circuits, to drive the photonics, and to do the computation."

“If you look at what’s happened over the last couple of years with silicon photonics around the world,” Dr. Paniccia continued, “it’s gone from a ‘PowerPoint technology’ [in presentations only] to a technology that’s quite viable. Two years ago, the fastest modulation in silicon was about 20 – 30 MHz. We went public in ’04 with 1 GHz modulation in silicon, a year later we demonstrated 10 Gbps, and since then, others have demonstrated around the world. These are three orders of magnitude improvement in performance in less than two years, and people are now talking about 40 and 100 Gbps, potentially, in silicon. These are fundamental changes, leaps in performance.”

Intel is looking here for the ultimate triple-play: a processor that will be introduced in fiberoptic networking, though could conceivably be integrated into general computing platforms in subsequent years, that is faster, smaller, and less expensive to produce, all at the same time.

Indium phosphide was chosen for the laser layer, Dr. John Bowers of UCSB told BetaNews today, because its physical structure enables what is called a direct band gap. It’s essentially a very simple semiconductor, where the combination of electrons and holes (absence of electrons) is recreated in a single step, rather than several, after the incoming current into the semiconductor is enticed to cross the junction.

Silicon and germanium, by contrast, enable an indirect band gap - though it’s still possible to reassemble the original electron/hole stream, it takes a few more steps, and is thus more physically complex. The combination for an indirect band gap is called a phonon process, as opposed to a photon process, where phonons are, simply put, heat.

As Dr. Paniccia said today, this heat dissipation may not be a problem. The fact that these processor enable higher-speed communications in the first place, could enable new server cooling architectures where, for instance, banks of memory are stationed meters away from the CPU instead of inches, thus reducing heat interaction.

“Today, basically the entire silicon photonics industry is based on indium phosphide devices,” Dr. Bowers continued, “and the data [communications] industry is based on gallium arsenide devices. But they’re [both] III-V materials because they’re high-gain.”

Conceivably, Dr. Bowers implied, this could become a political issue, as entire industries don’t give up their existing processes on a whim (the history of superconductivity being a prime example). However, Intel’s presence at today’s datacom conference – perhaps a novelty in itself, for this particular group – may be to help lead what he calls the “sea change.”

In previous silicon laser prototypes, the cost recoveries from the elimination of copper have been offset by the use of movable elements – gratings and mirrors, essentially – for guiding the modulated light beam throughout the processor. With today’s announcement that getting light onto the waveguide can take place literally through the glue holding them together, it now appears not only will optical processors become less expensive to produce over time, but will no longer require the use of a software-based monitoring system to ensure data integrity.

Dr. Paniccia said current hybrid silicon laser prototypes use 400 nm lithography, whereas production versions could eventually produce hundreds, or more than a thousand, silicon lasers simultaneously on a single wafer, for a cost of pennies per unit. At that time, he said, Intel will be able to take advantage of 65 nm production. But by the time that five- to ten-year timeframe plays out, he was asked, won’t 45 nm lithography already be in full swing?

With even 65 nm technology, he responded, “we will draft Moore’s Law,” borrowing phrases from both Intel’s history and NASCAR racing. “So we don’t have to be at the leading edge; we can be a generation or two behind, just like we are with chipsets...which allows us to take advantage of depreciated factories. We will always gain by better lithography, so as we move forward, we will take advantage of the lithography that’s available or that’s cost-effective; in terms of improving the laser performance, you will always benefit from better lithography, smaller devices, smoother surfaces."

“That’s really the nice thing [about] silicon photonics in general,” Dr. Paniccia continued. “As you go forward, you continue to improve and draft the investment that the industry is making, without having to be at the leading edge right from the beginning.”

Add a Comment

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By digitalking

edited Sep 20, 2006 - 8:46 AM

I know I am way off track here but:
The way war on earth is going, global warming, asteroids attacking us, deadly disease(ecoli infection, bird flu, etc.) we won't even be around to see this in 20 years. I remember in the early 80's or late 70's, when I was a youngster, the media was talking about how millions would be living in space stations by 2010. Yeah right. When I see affordable laser processor technology for the masses, I will believe it. I also heard at the same time in the 80's solar technology would be everywhere, used daily by the average joe. The only thing I see solar energy used for on a daily basis by the masses, is some construction road signs, and my calculator. It's all media hype.

Score: 0

By Tempt

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 5:35 PM

AMD FTW!

Score: 0

By davidtb

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 12:16 PM

Hey Photonics, read about it in the `80's

Cool

db.

Score: 0

By PC Rat

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 9:30 AM

...

"I will forget this news
in couple of months then
a decade later this may
be launched in the market
but it still may be out
of reach for many"

...

Ain't going to benefit regular users for another
twenty-years ...if ~ever~ !

Hear about this kind of breakthrough, it's a big
deal for five minutes, then you never hear anything
more about it again.

The problem for average computer users isn't
processor speed, anyway. The bottleneck is
elsewhere.

...

The Computer Rodent

...

Score: 0

By anmol.2k4

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 8:15 AM

I will forget this news in couple of months then a decade later this may be launched in the market but it still may be out of reach for many.
So it is completely waste of energy to get all excited about this right NOW.
It makes me wonder if few people here are taking too much sugar.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 10:56 AM

Since when does Sugar cause stupidity?

Score: 0

By anmol.2k4

edited Sep 20, 2006 - 3:27 PM

i found few people here a bit too excited about this, sooo....

Score: 0

By Floodland

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 8:06 AM

So, we'll need to wait 10 years to make Windoze vista run at decent speed? Intel have to hurry to please Micro$oft this time...

Score: 0

By extremely well

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 5:56 AM

Sorry - I won't believe it until I see it. Until then, though, parallel programming needs to be taken to a whole new level to efficiently use multi-core/CPU platforms. Everyone knows that. Something less known is that disk I/O access needs to be revamped to allow smart maximization. For instance, as I type this msg, I see no reason why my HD can't be churning away doing DEFRAG or DEEP VIRUS SCANNING COMPRESSED files with MULTIPLE anti-malware engines, fully indexing content, backing up data over internal network, etc. And I should not notice it AT ALL (the big difference from today's approaches). It should KNOW to reduce the usage of I/O to such a level that it has NO EFFECT ON MY CURRENT USAGE IN FRONT OF THE PC. Same thing needs to be done in regards to networking usage. QoS controls in routers and OS are very primitive.

Score: 0

By Crand3

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 9:22 AM

Primitive in comparison to what?

Score: 0

By Fickleflame

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 3:21 PM

You guys think your little Core Duo junkers are hardcore? That the latest crap from Intel is worth a damn? Your little chips will be worth nothing in several years.

When these light processors get produced, your looking at processing speeds in the zettahertz range within a couple of years. Now put your little processors away and see if you even know what a zettahert is without consulting google.

Comments like the ones below show how inept betanews users really are...

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 2:56 AM

How's you're DX2 going?

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 2:28 AM

You guys think your little Core Duo junkers are hardcore?

You got anything faster right now?

Thought not.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 8:30 PM

Your little chips will be worth nothing in
several years.


And they wouldn't be anyway?

Comments like the ones below show how inept betanews users really are...

Oh, like the one pointing out there is no such thing as a "hert"...in your statement that attempts to insult the readers here by suggesting they don't know what the non-existent thing is...and like you didn't have to look up what zetta was before you posted it.

Score: 0

By Crand3

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 7:40 PM

there's no such thing as a "hert". However, there can be 1 hertz. You'll forgive me for not taking seriously a comment made out of spite.

Score: 0

By The MAZZTer

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 7:16 PM

You'll forgive me if I ignore this new tech until it's sitting on a store shelf with these "zettahertz" measurements prominently displayed next to a very affordable price tag.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Sep 18, 2006 - 5:55 PM

You, sir, need to learn how to take a joke.

Lighten up. (Pun intended, if I have to explain it....

...oh forget it.)

Your little chips will be worth nothing in several years.

Which is basically the whole damn point. I'm not going to get all excited about a tech that is very possibly up to a *decade* or more away. Right now, it's a Pipe Dream. Get over yourself.

I utterly fail to see how not getting all uppity over non-existent tech makes me "inept".

I strongly suggest you speak with your physician about upping your Adderall dosage.

Score: 0

By Arakiel

edited Sep 18, 2006 - 5:21 PM

/me Offers Fickleflame a sense of humor...and a valium.

Score: 0

By Galway

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 4:17 PM

wow, did you invent it ?, cus it sounds like your shouting from a great height.

Score: 0

By Fickleflame

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 4:39 PM

No, I did not. However the current architectures we use today has been obsolete for years now. Photonics offers data transfers larger than we can handle, and will open doors to "light" storage which many storage companies are currently working on. If these new technologies come to pass all the current hardware used around the world will be useless from that point on.

For example are testing servers use new Intel 10GbE cards. These cards can sustain transfer speeds of over 8Gbit per second over the fiber line. Can are servers handle that load, yes. But that load is nothing because we have to ramp data transfer down so that the hardware receiving it can write it. Now say you have a light processor and photo storage available. The processor and storage would be operating at the same rate as the data transfer, so your total thru put goes through the roof.

Photonics is a development that would heighten are understanding of science and medicine because suddenly every researcher could have supercomputing power in their desktops. Most computer enthusiasts are more worried about the speed of their video cards and memory than they are about new developments that would enable game designers to create immense worlds with resolutions beyond HD.

It makes me mad that people don't seem to care.

Score: 0

By nightops

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 1:32 PM

Calm...down. Why should it make you upset? Most techs see where this can take us. However, many here have already noted that the problem with hearing this is that the technology is still many years down the road for BUSINESS use. Residential/general consumer use of this could be as many as 10 years away yet.

It's great to hear another techie with as much fervor for upcoming trends and technology as you obviously have, but that doesn't make anyone without that same tenacity 'stupid' or mean that they are living a meaningless existence. Most of us face the ultimate reality when it comes to technology: we simply do not have the funds available to sustain ownership of the creme de la creme of technology.

Please keep in mind that anyone that visits BetaNews.com and --especially-- takes time to bother posting in regards to a truly tech-based article (rather than "MS releases another patch for IE") truly do care about emerging trends in technology. Your blatant and tasteless flaming of these individuals is the same fundementalism that turns people away from religion.

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 2:22 AM

It makes me mad that people don't seem to care.

It makes me mad that some people don't know the difference between ARE and OUR.

And yet, somehow... the world goes on.

Score: 0

By jtahaney

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 11:53 PM

I think we can all agree that the potential of the technology to aid the science and medicine fields is not measurable.

The fastest hardware in the world will do nothing without software code that properly utilizes the resources.

"We" need to start writing better, faster code.

... and for that we don't have to wait 5-10 years.

Score: 0

By jshurst

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 9:42 AM

That's not entirely true. I write code and my apps will run faster on faster machines, it's just the way it works.

I'm not an low-level programmer, so maybe that is what you are referring to?

Score: 0

By jtahaney

posted Sep 21, 2006 - 11:11 PM

True... probably not in every situation but I would say even in high level languages (like say Perl) there are things you can do to optimize your code. Especially if your heavily using Regular Expressions (just one example that comes to mind).

Score: 0

By Grazer

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 12:28 PM

An attention to efficient organization of how code carries out its actions can make the same program run faster on a slower machine than the inefficient app on a faster machine. Granted, even the optimized program will run faster on a faster machine. (ie Don't use "bubble sort".)

Score: 0

By Litespeed

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 8:57 PM

@****leflame

"are testing servers..."
"Can are servers..."
"heighten are understanding..."

It makes me made that you care more about photonics than learning the difference between "our" and "are".

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 2:23 AM

Lol, try to spell "mad" right when correcting others' spelling.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 10:55 AM

This reply system is hosed. It's getting annoying.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 8:26 PM

Now say you have a light processor and photo storage available. The processor and storage would be operating at the same rate as the data transfer, so your total thru put goes through the roof.

You're making a false assumption there. You are assuming you will be able to write to photostorage as fast as you can transmit it. Not only that, they way you were talking, one could get the impression that transfer rates could be limitless; which is not the case. Since the electrical bits would be replaced by bits represented by pulses of light, those pulses would have to be spaced such that the hardware receiving them could discern one from the next.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Sep 18, 2006 - 5:32 PM

Damned screwy reply system.

Score: 0

By Galway

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 5:24 PM

"announced today the next step in their joint plans to produce an entirely solid-state photonic processor assembly"

"Though the company was at first unwilling to set a timeline, Dr. Mario Paniccia, director of Intel’s Photonics Technology Lab, today accepted a five- to ten-year timeframe"

This has a long to go before it fruits, and when it does it will be server based and expensive. Maybe in a few decades it will be mainstream, but until then i think im about right in my enthusiasm on this one. Its not that ive heard it before, but intel is allways a few generations ahead in development, and im sure it will not be in production until previous designs have been marketed and exausted before its brought in to recoup its costs and fund future ventures.

Its clear though that intel has stepped up its gear in chip design and fabrication and this has had to happen to fend off the might of AMD pushing 64bit and duel core processors, to such a degree that AMD is having to fall on Quad core processors to stay in contention. The thought of AMD obvously trying to get together an an all in one processor/chipset/graphic topology would create a standard similar to the consoles in respect that the processor it complemented by dedicated, powerfull and fast hardware as standard would be desirable to software houses and game players alike.

Moore's Law is allways being pushed, and its these developments that will keep it going.

I for one hope it works.

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

edited Sep 18, 2006 - 4:30 PM

Fickleflame, the Core Duo comment below was a joke, Warp is a term from Star Trek. Why are you screaming like a rabid fanboy anyway, this is from Intel too.

Score: 0

By dbarjim

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 1:47 PM

I heard they had an early model one of these on the Death Star and that is what cause it to really blow...........

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 1:23 PM

So, did they actually build this processor, or are they planning to build it? This is starting to sound like patent abuse.

Score: 0

By Galway

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 5:25 PM

"announced today the next step in their joint plans to produce an entirely solid-state photonic processor assembly"

"Though the company was at first unwilling to set a timeline, Dr. Mario Paniccia, director of Intel’s Photonics Technology Lab, today accepted a five- to ten-year timeframe"

Score: 0

By Das mod

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 12:25 PM

hey,, as long as it can still be overclocked i'll be happy with it :P ...

Score: 0

By trumpstone

edited Sep 19, 2006 - 7:57 AM

You of course, contrary to us despicable dual core suckers, are indulging in technology light years ahead none of us is even capable of comprehending...

Score: 0

By Litespeed

edited Sep 18, 2006 - 8:57 PM

removed

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 1:39 PM

Cap'n, I canna change the laws of physics!

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 1:23 PM

as long as it can still be overclocked

Are you going to try to get the light to travel faster?

Score: 0

By The Man

posted Sep 19, 2006 - 11:07 AM

it could work,
make little black hole chips to accelerate the light photons.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Sep 18, 2006 - 1:48 PM

Bah....

Lightspeed is for n00bs. The Warp 10 Core Duo ((LSx1000)xChi)x2) is what I'm waiting for.

Score: 0

By deminicus

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 2:41 PM

warp is for n00bz, ludicrous speed is where it's at. space balls ftw.

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 4:37 PM

Props for the Space Balls comment. So when the new light processor dies it probably will display plaid on the screen instead of some sort of BSOD...

"They've gone plaid!"

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 4:06 PM

I'll take the infinite improbability engine over any of those.

Score: 0

By doctorsmith

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 5:02 PM

Nah, I'm waiting for the Tachyon Core Duo, superluminal velocity is where it's at or where it used to be or where it was, is, and going to be. Faster than light = backward in time, can't wait, all those web pages I have to make finished before I even think of them.

Score: 0

By mxxcon

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 12:51 PM

but you'll have to screw in larger lightbulb

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 1:29 PM

Have to be a damn big lightbulb to fit two people....

Score: 0

By doctorsmith

posted Sep 18, 2006 - 4:52 PM

I think they cover that in the Kama Sutra under screw-in lightbulbs.

Score: 0

By inbredjed

edited Sep 28, 2006 - 1:12 PM

Wow! I'm really impressed with the maturity level here. There are sure a lot of "half-empty" glasses in here as well. Fact is, doesn't matter if the technology takes off or not, we will all be forced to deal with whatever is available at any specific time no matter. :) Fill up the glasses people the future looks as bright as a "light".

Score: 0