Login:
Password:

Madonna Leaves Record Industry in $120 Million Deal

By Ed Oswald, BetaNews

October 11, 2007, 12:30 PM

Madonna has become the latest artist to buck the record industry by signing a $120 million record deal with concert promoter Live Nation.

While it does not involve selling records directly to the public as other bands have decided to do, it does mark the largest act yet to turn its back on the record industry. Live Nation gains exclusive rights to three new studio albums, all merchandise, tours, and licensing of the Madonna name.

On Monday, Nine Inch Nails made an announcement that it will be selling its music directly to the public, and Oasis and Jamiroquai plan to follow suit. Radiohead is already selling its own albums digitally through an innovative concept that allows the fan to decide how much they want to pay for it.

Madonna, 49, had been one of Warner Bros' biggest acts for nearly two and a half decades. However, Live Nation outbid Warner, and the label refused to match it. The agreement goes for 10 years, nearly to Madonna's 60th birthday.

Warner does not immediately lose Madonna -- she still owes the group one more studio album. That is planned for next year. Additionally, the agreement allows Warner to release a greatest hits CD.

The company does not lose the rights to her songs produced while she was with Warner -- arguably her best work to date. However, at the same time, the loss of Madonna is a blow to Warner's bottom line and to the record industry as a whole.

Now that major acts are breaking away from the labels, it could force the industry to give artists a bigger slice of revenues from their work. But some see it as the beginning of the end, and that the days of the record industry may be numbered.

Neither Warner, Live Nation, nor Madonna's publicists were responding to requests for comment.

Add a Comment (48 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By SolApathy

posted Oct 13, 2007 - 1:29 PM

I'll wait for the headline...

RIAA sues artists for leaving!

Score: 0

By GS5

posted Oct 12, 2007 - 9:02 PM

I think Madonna just moved up to the top off RIAA's $h!t list. I wonder how long before the lawsuits start. LOL

Score: 0

By DeKoquonut

edited Oct 12, 2007 - 4:41 PM

Score: 0

By DeKoquonut

posted Oct 12, 2007 - 4:38 PM

The best part of this was no explanation of what Live Nation is and how they differ from a "Record Label". Thanks for the lack of information.

Score: 0

By timatl

posted Oct 12, 2007 - 9:37 AM

why is this posted on betanews?

Score: 0

By horsecharles

posted Oct 13, 2007 - 4:42 PM

Payola?

Score: 0

By uberfly

posted Oct 12, 2007 - 1:37 PM

Slow news day I guess. Maybe the old windbag will finally fade away now. Let's hope.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 8:36 PM

Bummer...

The headline made me think we had finally heard the last from her.

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 7:31 PM

In the end its business as usual and live nation are going to want to collect on their large investment. The music goes on just the same

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

edited Oct 11, 2007 - 6:47 PM

I love the fact that they can cut the record industry out of the business of selling music all together.

Artist selling directly is a great idea. I am glad she decided to make this deal, she is still one of the biggest names in recording, I wish U2 would do the same.

Digital delivery is all there will be in the near future.

Score: 0

By skimore

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 5:00 PM

Did the RIAA say that these artists will be homeless soon???? But really if you guy's were not downloading her music ALL day she would have got more like 600M maybe even 1B..
I'm going to just send her a check to help Madonna pay her bills!!

Score: 0

By ingram091

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 4:22 PM

Grats Madonna. Welcome to the revolution!!! Long live radioheads, DEATH TO RIAA.

Score: 0

By sjc001

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 3:16 PM

The way things are going the RIAA will soon only be able to "represent" dead artists since they wouldn't be able to leave the labels and after 50-70 years copyright expires.

Score: 0

By imafurby

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 2:48 PM

Can't wait to see what Madge comes up with when she's sixty. Maybe she'll be attacking some other religion by that stage. (or wearing a burkah)

Score: 0

By dracodos

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 2:23 PM

Warner still has her back catalog though so expect a third GH soon enough after she records her last album for them. They'll still be able to make money off her old music. Each time a new record comes out or a new tour starts thats when the other albums start selling again. If madonna was to also buy back her catalog then i can see Warner being screwed, right how it looks like Phase 1 to me.

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 2:20 PM

The RIAA is as outdated as the telegraph.

Score: 0

By pforbes

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 2:10 PM

New times demand new methods and the dissapearance of old fashioned commercial systems in which the music middleman and not the musician him/herself was the main winner.

Score: 0

By kbsoftware

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 2:01 PM

I wonder how the RIAA is going to blame this one on pirating :)

I think things are moving away from the record industry faster then most imagined because of the actions of the RIAA in the last few years. Wonder how they feel about that.

I can't help but wonder if in the future children will be talking about next 10 years or so as the time when large monopolies crumbled. RIAA and the record industries, MPAA and the movie industries even Microsoft.
A guy can dream :)

I just hope when all the smoke clears and everything is said and done that we have better music to listen to. If I have to listen to Led Zeppelin Stairway to Heaven one more time on the radio I'm going to scream drive to the radio station and bite the station managers leg :)

Score: 0

By drumcat

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:37 PM

The artists are cutting out the middleman. Finally.

Score: 0

By CMSTech

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:36 PM

Why is this on BetaNews?

Score: 0

By SMFulton3

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 3:20 PM

I know in one respect this seems like celebrity news, but the move has some very serious implications in one of the most lucrative sectors of the information technology industry: recorded music. If this is indeed the beginning of a shift in the balance of power, then the intellectual property portfolios of the various rights holders and manufacturers who determine the way you store your data could be directly and severely affected. In that case, Madonna may have just done as much to impact the future of data storage as, say, Toshiba switching to Blu-ray or Seagate moving to all-hybrid.

-SF3

Score: 0

By RCS

edited Oct 12, 2007 - 12:51 PM

"...Toshiba switching to Blu-ray..."

Why would Toshiba switch to Blu-Ray? It's more likely that everyone else would realize that Blu-Ray is a POS and switch to HD-DVD. Then Sony can go down in flames like it deserves to.

Oh, and the PS3 is a POS also. And Sony wants to put rootkits on every computer in the world. And they're the anti-Christ.

/flame_bait

Score: 0

By drumcat

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:37 PM

Because the RIAA is one of the most discussed criminal rackets here...

Score: 0

By CMSTech

edited Oct 11, 2007 - 1:40 PM

my mistake..:)

I guess I should be over at www.boycott-riaa.com/news for my tech news..:)

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 2:21 PM

Well, music distribution is technology.

Score: 0

By CMSTech

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 5:24 PM

does that mean that banana distribution will be covered next?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 8:47 PM

As soon as we start distributing banana's digitally, sure.

'Til then, why don't you hold your breath.

Mmmkay?

Score: 0

By billweh

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:24 PM

It was only a matter of time. I think we'll soon see the end of CDs being sold altogether. Why bother with the hassle of it all?

Sell the songs for $1 each and let the users download and make their own CDs. Everyone with a computer these days has a burner and I think most listen to their music on an MP3 player anyway.

Why do we want to keep wasting time and money on creating all of these CDs that no one is going to buy? Or they'll buy and then stow in a closet because they've ripped the music to MP3?

Score: 0

By computershack

posted Oct 13, 2007 - 8:37 AM

"Why do we want to keep wasting time and money on creating all of these CDs that no one is going to buy?"

Because the audio quality of MP3/WMA/FLAC etc even in "lossless" bitrate is absolutely dire. Most of the harmonics and stuff you don't consciously hear but which enhance the richness of the sound are stripped out.

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Oct 12, 2007 - 2:40 AM

There's still a much, much larger part of the market that doesn't have a PC with a burner, or an MP3 player, or is even interested in a PC-based version of their music.

Even as someone who DOES listen to a lot of music from PCs or portable players I still prefer CDs so I can get CD-quality recordings. Until online distribution is all FLAC or equivalent, that's not going to change. Then there's the bandwidth problem... an album encoded in FLAC can be expensive to download for some. As an example, your average Aussie broadband pundit is on a measly 256kbps ADSL plan, with 200MB download limit. Downloads beyond this are 15c/MB. First album: $60. Subsequent albums $90.

Ouch.

Score: 0

By Straspey

edited Oct 11, 2007 - 2:46 PM

Of course those of us who want to purchase a new recording of the "Vespers of 1610" by Claudio Monteverdi, Mozart's "Magic Flute" or Stravinsky's "Rite Of Spring" are left completely out in the cold.

You should realize that there is an entire section of the world's population for whom the internet/digital music age has no relevance due to the fact that their choice in musical entertainment has been all but completely abandoned by the "business" of selling to college kidz with short-term attention spans geared towards a library of five-minute pop tunes.

Sure, you can always get Luciano Pavarotti or Yo Yo Ma's latest album...but that's like only being able to buy the newest release by Micheal Feinstein as a viable example of current pop music.

I find this endless argument about the RIAA and copyright law to be both amusing and annoying because it's based on a very narrow view of the cultural tastes of the population at large.

And yes...I fully realize that if every college kid wanted Yo Yo Ma more than Madonna, then he'd be the one announcing the new $120 mil contract today. But that's not the point...the point is that there are many more people than the narrow slice discussed here, who are affected by this issue.

Score: 0

By billweh

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 4:32 PM

I don't consider myself a "college kidz" - been a lot of years since that happened - but looking at Amazon's MP3 downloads - all but the "Vespers of 1610" is available in MP3 format. So I don't think we've been abandoned.

But just as we had to move from record to 8-track to cassette to CD, I think the next move is going to be to MP3 (or some form of electronic distributed media - rather than on physical medium). Times change, like it or not this time we're lucky in that we don't have to go out an rebuy our albums again. We can just rip them to MP3. Also - just as when CDs first came out, there weren't a whole lot to choose from. Mostly it was contemporary bands that came out in multiple formats, but within a few years, the labels started releasing their albums on CD as well.

If bands going forward were to not sign with labels but just cut their music straight to MP3 - they could sell them on their own through an intermediary and make more money and get the music out faster.

They'd also not have to fill an album with crud they didn't want to record in the first place, just to get the few songs they did like out.

Score: 0

By Das mod

edited Oct 11, 2007 - 1:14 PM

And what happened then?
Well, in SUEville they say
that the music industry's big pocket
shrunk three sizes that day.
And then the true meaning of music
came through, since the industry
lost the strength of Madonna,
plus two.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 13, 2007 - 10:53 AM

Das Suess?

Score: 0

By billweh

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:30 PM

Oh yeah "Das mod" - this was great!

Score: 0

By horsecharles

posted Oct 14, 2007 - 6:24 PM

A boy named Sue....

Score: 0

By dlab21

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:27 PM

that was enjoyable.

Score: 0

By WeezulDK

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:07 PM

It's about time something like this happened. Maybe now the racketeering and extortion, and exploitation of the artists can stop.

I think the best thing artists can do now is produce their own albums, and include a CD as part of the ticket price to a concert. Go in the doors, pay your ticket, get handed a stub and a CD, enjoy the live show, and take the CD home with you.

Getting a disc mass produced isn't that big of a deal. The advent of the home PC, a decent investment in the right equipment and software to make a home studio, you've got all you need. With the internet today, all you need is a website, word of mouth and a little exposure on a social networking site like YouTube and the like, and voila, you're bypassing all the "middlemen" that wheedle percentages of work you are doing, and creative products you are producing.

Besides, this overhyped corporate-driven drivel is getting old. Maybe a revolution in sound and style will arise from this, where every album doesn't sound like it was mixed by an engineer, instead is more "personal" and "club/concert" sounding like the old concert CD's from bands that tour Asia and Europe used to sound like. One of my favorite albums was a Whitesnake concert. It had more "life" in it, gave you the feeling that you were there.

Score: 0

By tazandpig

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 1:00 PM

Did BetaNews suddenly transform into 'PopNews' while I wasn't looking?

Score: 0

By TomeOne

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 12:58 PM

While the RIAA is out extorting money from individuals, all the big stars are leaving the labels.

Karma, baby. Karma.

Score: 0

By horsecharles

posted Oct 14, 2007 - 6:25 PM

Karma, karma, karma, karmeleon... you come and go.... you come and goooooooo....

Score: 0

By CCL

edited Oct 11, 2007 - 3:09 PM

I Wonder how long it will take before the King of POP will do the same now that the Queen of POP has taken this step!!!!!

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Oct 11, 2007 - 5:11 PM

Nothing, the real Michael Jackson died in 1985.

Score: 0

By horsecharles

posted Oct 14, 2007 - 6:29 PM

Ever notice that- just like Superman & Clark Kent / Batman & Bruce Wayne- no one's ever seen Michael & Janet together?

Score: 0

By TomeOne

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 3:14 PM

Well apparently he's got some exciting news soon.

Score: 0

By Skizelli

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 4:52 PM

He probably just saved a bunch of money on his car insurance by switching to Geico.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 11, 2007 - 8:45 PM

roflmao

Score: 0

By horsecharles

posted Oct 14, 2007 - 6:30 PM

Try not to leave skid marks please.

Score: 0