Login:
Password:

Microsoft Rushes Patch for VML Exploit

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

September 22, 2006, 10:56 PM

Sophos Labs now rates as “critical” a re-emerging exploit to Microsoft’s Vector Markup Language (VML) library, which Microsoft now says it will try to patch before its original October 10 deadline, announced on Thursday. This comes as the SANS Group raises its InfoCon level officially to “yellow,” “to emphasize the need to consider fixes.”

In the meantime, a group of software engineers called the Zeroday Emergency Response Team (ZERT) has issued what it characterizes as an interim patch for the VML exploit, possibly closing the door to a new series of Trojans.

In so doing, a new group resurrects some old questions: Should consumers trust third parties to patch Windows when Microsoft isn't able to do so just yet? And does implementing a third-party patch make it more difficult for Microsoft - or anyone - to patch Windows in the future?

Only in the information security business can one become both underground and high-profile simultaneously. A story in Friday morning's eWeek characterized ZERT as "a high-profile group of computer security professionals," although the membership list on the group's Web site admits to not listing everyone in the group, because "some ZERT volunteers prefer anonymity."

ZERT only claims its patch addresses the buffer overflow vulnerability, but does not explain exactly what it is the patch is supposed to do. Not even the eWeek story gives a description of the patch, although it does quote one volunteer member of the ZERT group as saying, "Something has to be done about Microsoft's patching cycle."

"ZERT members work together as a team," the group's Web site reads, "to release a non-vendor patch when a so-called '0day' (zero-day) exploit appears in the open which poses a serious risk to the public, to the infrastructure of the Internet or both. The purpose of ZERT is not to 'crack' products, but rather to 'uncrack' them by averting security vulnerabilities in them before they can be widely exploited."

The VML patch is the group's first, so it remains to be seen whether the public at large is willing to trust a high-profile group of unknowns to provide them with "something," rather than wait for Microsoft to make good on its pledges to produce anything. ZERT's press liaison did not return BetaNews' request for comment.

"Microsoft is aware of third party mitigations that attempt to block exploitation of vulnerabilities in Microsoft software," a Microsoft spokesperson told BetaNews late Friday afternoon. "While Microsoft can appreciate the steps these vendors and independent security researchers are taking to provide our customers with mitigations, as a best practice, customers should obtain security updates and guidance from the original software vendor.

"Microsoft carefully reviews and tests security updates and workarounds to ensure that they are of high quality and have been evaluated thoroughly for application compatibility," the spokesperson added. "Microsoft cannot provide similar assurance for independent third party security updates or mitigations."

Sophos has noted three Trojans in the wild thus far that utilize the exploit, all of which appear to be delivering a payload that sniffs the infected user's system for passwords. It is apparently not known whether those passwords are then transmitted back to a server through an unmonitored port. One Trojan also attempts the blatant step of deleting the IEXPLORE.EXE file.

Since the exploit is a variation of a vulnerability discovered in 2004, Sophos Anti-virus and other brand-name products will likely detect all three of these Trojans, whether they're delivered via the Web or through non-upgraded versions of Outlook 2003.

However, knowing not everyone protects their systems against viruses so vigorously, Sophos' senior technology consultant Graham Cluley believes, even the least skilled malicious user now perceives the period between now and Microsoft's October 10 deadline as "open season."

"This is now a race against time," Cluley stated on Sophos' Web site Friday. "Even though reports of the exploit are so far limited, companies reliant on Internet Explorer would be wise to follow Microsoft's advice on ways to avoid this particular form of attack as it may be weeks before a patch from Microsoft is available."

If Microsoft is racing against time, you wouldn't know it by the company's public statement today on its Security Response Center blog. "There's been some confusion...that somehow attacks are dramatic and widespread," Microsoft team member Scott Deacon wrote Friday morning.

"We're just not seeing that from our data, and our Microsoft Security Response Alliance partners aren't seeing that at all either. Of course, that could change at any moment, and regardless of how many people are being attacked, we have been working non-stop on an update to help protect from this vulnerability."

Add a Comment (19 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By codeforge

posted Sep 25, 2006 - 4:50 PM

I love the smell of browser war in the morning!

Anyway, lets add some fuel to the flames:

http://arstechnica.com/n...post/20060925-7818.html

Seems Firefox leads the way for browser vulnerabilities for the first six months of 2006.

*Runs for cover*

Score: 0

By Xsoldier

edited Sep 25, 2006 - 12:14 PM

Wow, and here I am still using Firefox 1.5.0 with no need to update...

Linux boys, I switched and never looked back.

Seriously, with everybodies complaint with M$ that I've read here... if your tired of the patches and such; change! Quit complaining about it as there are PLENTY of other opitons out there.

Score: 0

By Metshrine

posted Sep 25, 2006 - 4:34 PM

Yes, because we all know linux and firefox NEVER need patching. Hell, doing an apt-get update this morning led me to 48 new updates for packages that are core to the use of linux itself.

Score: 0

By noBuddy

posted Sep 23, 2006 - 5:32 PM

O, yes, our Firefox friends...
Next week comes 1.5.0.8 - just a repatched 1.5.0.7 version.
And Firefox 2 can´t be published - still the same problems with extensions (the biggest security hole in Firefox).
And yes, I use them all: IE, Firefox and Opera. Depending on the websites I visit. But when I´m going to the really bad ones, I prefer IE - less attacks running. Believe it or not.
There is NONE out, which will give you full security. As their is no car out, which will beware you of accidents.

Score: 0

By The MAZZTer

edited Sep 23, 2006 - 8:48 PM

O, yes, our Explorer friends...
Next week comes ANOTHER IE PATCH... just a repatched IE6 version.
And IE7 can't be published - still the same problems with ActiveX (the biggest security hole in IE).
And yes, I use them all: IE, Firefox, Opera, lynx, and wget. Depending on the websites I visit. But when I´m going to the really bad ones, I prefer Firefox - less attacks running. Believe it or not.
There is NONE out, which will give you full security. As their is no car out, which will beware you of accidents.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted Sep 25, 2006 - 4:18 PM

Funny indeed. I have used many browsers, though I admit I haven't tried netscape or Opera for a while. I do find that IE is the most attacked browser out there in general--however, I have not had any security exploits recently.

How? I disable all add-ons other than the required ones, I regularly update the addons, regularly update Windows and Windows Defender, as well as update Spybot S&D and AVG Antivirus.

NOTHING gets on my pc without my knowledge, other than perhaps some new tracking cookies that I haven't blocked yet. I customise my antivirus to scan the temp internet files fully, but the rest of my pc has application extensions checked only. No problems yet,my last virus was about a year ago and my AV and I eradicated it.

Can Firefox get viruses? Possibly. CAN IE get viruses? Heck yeah, I am not perfect. Do I prefer Firefox? Absolutely not--I've used IE since 2.0 and cannot stand the "interface" of any other brand. Why? Because I know how Microsoft does things, NOT because I am a fanboy. (I AM if you consider a "loyal user" a fanboy, but I always check the alternatives.)

Score: 0

By Banquo

posted Sep 24, 2006 - 4:25 PM

Yes, that was lame.

Score: 0

By THZGryphon

posted Sep 24, 2006 - 1:29 AM

Lame

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Sep 23, 2006 - 4:06 PM

"Microsoft carefully reviews and tests security updates and workarounds to ensure that they are of high quality and have been evaluated thoroughly for application compatibility," the spokesperson added. "Microsoft cannot provide similar assurance for independent third party security updates or mitigations."

They can't provide those assurances themselves: http://www.microsoft.com...8c00&DisplayLang=en How hipocritical of Microsoft!

Score: 0

By Ramhound

posted Sep 22, 2006 - 11:54 PM

Do I use Firefox, yes, is it because of IE security issues, heck no.

Its because I wanted a better product, or what I considering a better product. Will I upgrade to IE 7 and use it, heck yes.

Score: 0

By CyberDoc999

posted Sep 22, 2006 - 11:07 PM

Ask yourself....
When will you just stop using IE
and use FireFox??

Score: 0

By Fred Garvin

posted Sep 24, 2006 - 1:58 PM

Yeah...Microshaft SUXXXXXXX, dude. Bill Gates is an imperialist pig. Rock on, man. Firefox rulezzzzz duuuuddeZZZZZZZZZ

(Said in all jest)

Score: 0

By sophist_dreams

posted Sep 24, 2006 - 9:42 AM

yup

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Sep 23, 2006 - 4:03 PM

2.5 years ago?

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

edited Sep 23, 2006 - 10:52 AM

Tried that for my parent's PC as they kept getting viruses all the time. Unfortunately, they ended up getting viruses via Sun's Java console...and when I looked farthur into it, I discovered that Sun's Java platform was the culprit the whole time.

I fixed it--and I know you guys will never believe me--by reinstalling Windows XP Gold (as it still had msjava) and running all the microsoft updates. Since then my parents haven't gotten one virus using IE 6 SP2 fully patched browser.

EDIT: Yes, my PC has IE7 RC1, and the msjava works surprisingly well with it.

Score: 0

By Scipio

posted Sep 23, 2006 - 10:23 PM

I'm not sure if I'd want to do that, but I agree that Sun java is a PITA. I was a lot happier with MS's Virtual Machine. Smaller footprint, and much more efficient.

Score: 0

By Murphmeister

posted Sep 22, 2006 - 11:35 PM

When Microsoft buy out Mozilla, fix it, re-brand it, and intergrate it into their operating system.

(Yes, I am a fanboy)

Until then IE7 for me.

Score: 0

By landfish

posted Sep 23, 2006 - 5:01 PM

"When Microsoft buy out Mozilla, fix it, re-brand it, and intergrate it into their operating system." -

No that's when it's time to drop Mozilla

Score: 0

By sld

posted Sep 24, 2006 - 2:07 AM

And Opera will take up the charge.

Score: 0