Login:
Password:

Microsoft denies handing law enforcement 'backdoor' keys

By Jacqueline Emigh, BetaNews

April 30, 2008, 4:56 PM

Some bloggers this week are suggesting that Microsoft is handing out "backdoor keys" to Windows security to police officers. Although Microsoft is denying the bulk of the rumors, a full explanation still seems a bit elusive.

In a statement to BetaNews this afternoon, a Microsoft spokesperson denied that a technology unveiled at a law enforcement conference in Seattle on Monday would be used to equip officers and investigators with "backdoors" into Windows systems, as various blogs and news sources have since speculated.

"COFEE does not circumvent Windows Vista BitLocker encryption or undermine any protections in Windows through secret 'backdoors' or other undocumented means," reads Microsoft's explanation to BetaNews today.

During that Monday conference, a Microsoft executive introduced attendees to a new tool called the Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor (COFEE), saying that Microsoft has distributed the USB drive to about 2,000 law enforcement officers in 15 countries since its introduction last June.

According to a transcript of the talk at the Law Enforcement Technology Conference 2008, posted on Microsoft's Web site, Brad Smith, Microsoft VP and general counsel, described COFEE as "a Swiss Army knife [for] law enforcement officers."

Smith went on to say that the USB fob contains 150 software tools aimed at helping police with the job of forensics, or crime investigation.

"It can be programmed to do all of the work automatically, in which case it can do what it needs to do in about 20 minutes, instead of four hours. But we also designed it to be a platform, if you will, so you are your colleagues can customize it further, if you like," according to the general counsel.

On Tuesday, the Seattle Times published an article based on an interview between Smith and Benjamin J. Romano, a technology reporter at the newspaper.

"The device contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence, which is becoming more important in real-world crime, as well as cybercrime. It can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer," Romano wrote in his article.

Soon afterward, a blogger for Techdirt posted an entry, evidently based on an e-mail from a Techdirt reader, which seemed to blow COFEE's capabilities out of proportion.

"Apparently, they're giving out special USB keys that simply get around Microsoft's security, allowing the holder of the key to very quickly get forensic information (including internet surfing history), passwords and supposedly encrypted data off of a laptop," wrote Techdirt's Mike Masnick. He went on to refer to the pathway Microsoft was allegedly making available to law enforcement as a "backdoor," adding that the fact that it's giving law enforcement a key to this door is validation that such a door exists.

"Now you have more evidence as to why trusting Microsoft's 'security' isn't such a good idea," Masnick added.

The key presumption here was that the security which Microsoft was helping law enforcement officials to break through, was Microsoft's own security rather than to the dozens of other possible password caches in third-party Windows software.

Others then jumped on the "backdoor" bandwagon. "The security specialists at Microsoft, not satisfied with just how insecure their operating systems have turned out, have unveiled a USB dongle that plugs into a computer, bypasses any Windows passwords or encryption, and quickly downloads sensitive data such as your Web browsing history," according to a posting in Valleywag.

But although Romano did mention password decryption in his Seattle Times article, he didn't say anything about any other type of encryption or decryption -- such as the BitLocker encryption included in Vista for encrypting users' hard drives -- or anything specifically about a "backdoor." Nor did Romano talk about a "backdoor."

Similarly, Microsoft's Smith didn't touch specifically on encryption or decryption in his speech to the police. He did bring up "backdoors," but with regard to online criminal exploits rather than anything law enforcement would use.

According to Smith, new exploits are being produced consisting of "a mixture of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 technologies as people create new sorts of efforts to create backdoors, to drop code onto people's PCs, and to keep those backdoors there, and then use other Web sites to send instructions to people's machines. [This is] also leading to new forms of phishing, if you will."

In more recent updates to his article in the Seattle Times, Romano tried to cut through some of the confusion. "Today's story on a Microsoft device that helps law enforcement gather forensic evidence from a crime suspect's computer has garnered lots of attention and raised questions about [exactly how] it works and what it is able to do," he wrote.

"It sounds to me that like the device doesn't do anything that a trained computer forensics expert can't already do. This just automates the execution of the commands for data extraction," according to Romano.

Romano further updated his story with excerpts from a written statement he received from a Microsoft spokesperson, which reportedly stated that "COFEE is a compilation of publicly available forensics tools, such as 'password security auditing technologies' used to access information 'on a live Windows system.' It 'does not circumvent Windows Vista BitLocker encryption or undermine any protections in Windows through secret 'backdoors' or other undocumented means.'"

Today, Microsoft sent BetaNews another statement, which similarly denies both a "backdoor" and any circumvention of BitLocker encryption. But the statement given to BetaNews contains no mention of the kinds of "password security auditing technologies" that might conceivably be used to recover (or uncover?) user passwords.

When asked by BetaNews for comment on the use of password auditing technologies in COFEE, the spokesperson said only that Microsoft would be "back in touch when there is more information to share" on this question.

Presented to BetaNews as Microsoft's most current word on the subject of COFEE, the statement reads as follows:

COFEE (Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor) is a framework for first-responders to customize a set of common forensic tools. It is a framework that law enforcement can use to leverage publically available forensic tools to access information on a live Windows system operating from a USB storage device. The tool allows law enforcement to run over 150 commands on a live computer system and save the results for later analysis, preserving information that could be lost if the computer had to be shut down and transported to a lab.

COFEE is designed for use by law enforcement only with proper legal authority. COFEE is not new forensic tools, but rather the creation of an easy to use, automated forensic tool at the scene. It's the ease of use, speed, and consistency of evidence extraction that is key.

COFEE does not circumvent Windows Vista BitLocker encryption or undermine any protections in Windows through secret 'backdoors' or other undocumented means.

Add a Comment (53 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By robmanic44

posted May 2, 2008 - 7:38 AM

A bunch of the usual suspects. Up against the wall and spread'em. If such a device existed everyone would own one within a year. Can you imagine the possibilities for extortion?

Score: 0

By mdotwills

posted May 2, 2008 - 4:33 AM

Non proprietary OS will fix this? :)

Score: 0

By pforbes

edited May 2, 2008 - 8:15 AM

If a judge authorizes it, it doesn't matter the OS: you must allow any investigation. What is at stake is a very different thing, something which nowadays happens every day i.e. in Cuba or North Corea, and of course something deeper than coffee or milk.

Score: 0

By Gungistoker

posted May 1, 2008 - 8:16 PM

I've always wondered, if law enforcement doesn't circumvent Windows Vista BitLocker encryption, then how do they get to a suspect's data? Beat the password out of him?

Score: 0

By Avion Airplane

posted May 1, 2008 - 12:37 PM

I want one !

Score: 0

By mdotwills

posted May 2, 2008 - 4:32 AM

Me too!

Score: 0

By pforbes

edited May 2, 2008 - 7:56 AM

If users never demanded such a giant software and hardware pyramid as Vista, I wonder what's behind it.

Score: 0

By Straspey

posted May 1, 2008 - 11:36 AM

Microsoft and all those "Security Agents" are welcome to enter my back door any time they want...and once they're inside they can wash the dishes and take out the trash.

Score: 0

By Toolie's Muse

posted May 3, 2008 - 11:10 AM

Toolie's already lookin' "to enter your back door", so to speak!

Score: 0

By mdotwills

posted May 2, 2008 - 4:33 AM

lol. True.

Score: 0

By preinterpost

posted May 1, 2008 - 12:25 PM

Ok.......

Score: 0

By DatabaseBen

posted May 1, 2008 - 9:58 AM

wasn't at&t denying something similar as well, that is until the whistle was blown.

there is no doubt that homeland security, cia, justice dept, etc have twisted microsoft's arm to "create" a backdoor.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted May 1, 2008 - 10:13 AM

there is no doubt that homeland security, cia, justice dept, etc have twisted microsoft's arm to "create" a backdoor.

...unless, of course, you've yet to buy into all the tinfoil hat BS...

Score: 0

By preinterpost

posted May 1, 2008 - 8:57 AM

Gotta love those 'denies' headlines.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited May 1, 2008 - 10:20 AM

Don't you?

I could make some serious dough off of that, I think:

Just call 'em up, ask them completely absurd questions and write about it:

Hey! Microsoft denies using subliminal messaging in Windows Messenger to create a sleeper cell Anti-Apple/Anti-Linux Brute Squad!

NEWSFLASH: Steve Jobs denies copying every feature in Mac OSX from IBM's OS/2!

THIS JUST IN! Linux founder, Linus Torvalds denies using Microsoft Windows for all his "real" computing needs!

Heh....

Easy as pie.

...we all know denial=fact, right?

Score: 0

By Toolie's Muse

posted May 2, 2008 - 12:52 PM

Toolie,
Bad doggie, stop licking your nuts!
We know you don't use 'nix or any distros' thereof!
Geez, with 4 fingers 'n a softie, it MUST BE HARD!
We must meet in my driveway, I've a Hummer!
Notice, I said I have a "Hummer", and yep to "dv ferret" and your other acolytes, apostles & apologists, help clean the boy up!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted May 2, 2008 - 1:54 PM

Posting this s*** on a 3 day old article...scared someone might actually *read* your BS?

Sad little poppet....

Score: 0

By Toolie's Muse

posted May 3, 2008 - 11:34 AM

Speaking of 3 day old articles buddy, what do you have an ego alert?
I watch the garbage you post my friend, what was once a great board has deteriorated, with your supercilious & sarcastic comments.
Had always assumed, alas to my chagrin, this was a nice place to be.
You my friend have dragged this down to be little more than an expression, of your very limited intellect.
Whilst you've making your snide comments, I've been busy purchasing 2 bedroom apartments in Manhattan (3 in 2 weeks at an average of M1.3), hence do not often get the time to waste on your little diatribes.
As an aside, were it not for your hero "HIM" "George W Bush", would never have been able to do this, shows how much your buck is worth, selling the godd*** farm.
Anyway, doggy a little copraphilia in the driveway is fine, as Verbal Kint would say "you can kiss my pucker anytime"!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted May 1, 2008 - 8:02 AM

*laughs*

I can do this with a Knoppix CD in about 10 minutes. This is not a backdoor, it's a hack, just like the Live Linux recovery CDs.

'nuff said.

(though the sheep will bleat on about it endlessly, no doubt)

Score: 0

By pitdingo2

posted May 1, 2008 - 8:05 AM

Even I do not think M$ would be dumb enough to include a back door into Windows. There would be no way to keep something like that secret even with their closed source model.

Someone, somewhere in the world would expose something that big. Think about it, a way to infect every M$ Windows box on the planet would be priceless.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted May 1, 2008 - 10:12 AM

Exactly.

Score: 0

By Toolie's Muse

posted May 2, 2008 - 12:58 PM

Soft Tool,
What do you mean "exactly"? Dumb @#$#%, no brains & full of come here wither?
Champ, has the "mongrel" yet seen your comment?
You godd***ed fool!!!

Score: 0

By morriscox

posted May 2, 2008 - 8:04 PM

Not a pleasure to meet you, Soft Tool. Please stop talking to yourself and wasting our time. Get a life, you loser.

Score: 0

By Aires

posted May 1, 2008 - 5:47 AM

While this is one of the most interesting stories I've read at BetaNews for a very very long time, this is one of the most awful stories to read and quite frankly I'm appalled by the quality of the writing here. I've said it before and I'll say it again - what started off as an interesting story to read developed into a mess and you guys really need to learn how to write a news story succinctly and clearly to the point.

Score: 0

By Gungistoker

posted May 1, 2008 - 8:31 PM

Look, I'll admit that BetaNews isn't the New York Times but what does BetaNews have to do with this topic and many other topics where they are hammered by the same posters. Sounds like a few people here had their resumes denied or something.

Score: 0

By Aires

posted May 2, 2008 - 5:49 AM

BetaNews doesn't have to be the New York Times but I would've expected the standard of the writing to improve over the years. I didn't join this site last week and I've been a member of the site for years. The site comes across as though it's being run by someone in their early twenties who has no grasp of grammar. In fact the site comes across as though it's only run by about two or three people in all seriousness. I do expect progress and I do expect clarity - otherwise one day I'll just eventually decide to stop coming here. Simple as.

Score: 0

By tscar13

posted May 1, 2008 - 8:22 AM

First of all. that's BN for you. Expect only the "lowest standards" in writing. Now as to the point. With all the tools that are available to law enforcement, do you really think they need a backdoor to anything and with a rubberstamp spy court they don't really need even a warrant. So, set aside any bias and see how silly all this is and I would say the same thing if the story (Fiction more than non-fiction) was about Apple.

Score: 0

By ingram091

posted May 1, 2008 - 3:09 AM

Personally I'm all for a small piece of c4 triggered to a sensor, that if removed will blow up in their face, and if the wrong password is used more then 3 times destroys the HD in the computer... That Should be enough for the really paranoid... lol

Score: 0

By roj

posted May 1, 2008 - 12:06 AM

"As anyone with knowledge of computer security will tell you, the only way to ensure your data is protected is to use strong encryption and use a strong, large key."

You forgot "denying physical access to the box". If that is allowed, ALL bets are off.

Score: 0

By morriscox

posted May 2, 2008 - 8:09 PM

If it's out of your hands, it's out of your control.

If someone has (physical) access to your computer, it's not your computer.

Don't trust anyone, including yourself.

Score: 0

By The MAZZTer

posted May 1, 2008 - 12:02 AM

All of the things this tool can do can also be done from a Linux LiveCD... Linux NTFS drivers ignore NTFS permissions and you can access a user's personal files without needing a password.

The same is true for EFS2 drivers for Windows (I can see my Linux personal files without needing a password). Basically OS-based security is useless when you swap OSs. It's only when you start talking about encryption does it become impossible to work around it by simply booting another OS.

This tool seems to simplify existing tasks and allow officers to run them on a running PC. This can allow for extraction of data from mounted encrypted drives (which is akin to having an opened safe lying around) as opposed to taking the system back only to find out it had an encrypted disk.

Cracking Windows passwords is old news. It's been done for years. Windows password security is not very strong.

As anyone with knowledge of computer security will tell you, the only way to ensure your data is protected is to use strong encryption and use a strong, large key.

All this tool really does is make it recommended to unmount your encrypted filesystems when you're not using them. Or shut off your computer whenever someone rings the doorbell.

In other news, the countdown has begun for the inevitable leak of COFEE onto the Internet and the misuse that will follow at local libraries and schools the world over.

Score: 0

By cap737

posted May 1, 2008 - 1:11 AM

I use BartPE to read folders with permissions. It's also really good as a password changer with ERD plugin and virus scanner with the McAfee commandline tool.

Score: 0

By DrNewtonD

edited Apr 30, 2008 - 9:50 PM

I don't think the point to all of this is that these tools exist or whether or not Windows is full of backdoors (everyone knows already that it is full of holes and a hole in the wall is much easier to enter then a locked door) but the point is why would Microsoft produce a toolset that would make it look like they are doing something they are not.
Would you trust an encryption algorithm that was created by the NSA? The whole point is that there is a serious conflict of interests here. Would anyone trust an Antivirus program created by Microsoft when most exploits take advantage of holes in Microsoft products? By Microsoft making available COFEE they are inviting speculation into whether or not backdoors exist. I am not a conspiracy type but I try to be logical and when your software is closed source and you start providing "tools" to allow for the "forensic" circumvention of any of it - even the smallest and most harmless parts - you are inviting conspiracy in.
One last point. If a tools exists that can decrypt passwords and allow an investigator access to a live PC without having to shut it down and transport it somewhere, any drive encryption is a moot argument. Drive encryption does not protect a PC when a “valid user” has access to the PC. Unless the authentication of a separate encryption volume, that does not use the Windows GINA for its access, is used then obtaining the windows user id and password gives you full access to the contents of the harddrives as well. Remember, all security is only as strong as the weakest link. Break that link and the rest is made ineffective.

Score: 0

By skimore

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 6:48 PM

Why not call it Hot Cofee? After the GTA3 hack??

If it exists it the tool will find it's ways to the public.. just watch the torrents and go to defcon someone will release it..

Score: 0

By hotchick79

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 6:19 PM

Oh come on, everyone knows M$ OS (and especially Vista) are full of Investigation backdoors. Nothing new here.

Score: 0

By preinterpost

posted May 1, 2008 - 10:51 AM

Are you dating the Mac Guy?

Score: 0

By jeffreybt2

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 6:38 PM

Hi pitdingo2

examples please.

Score: 0

By Avion Airplane

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 6:09 PM

COOL !!!! I CAN NOT WAIT TO GET MY HANDS ON ONE !!! The Dream Key lol

Score: 0

By Program86

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 5:44 PM

try and get into my machine fukers! I have a few surprises waiting for you...

Score: 0

By preinterpost

posted May 1, 2008 - 10:54 AM

Could you please post a URL, login and password?

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 7:01 PM

A filesystem consisting of tens of thousands of files named hello.jpg?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited May 2, 2008 - 1:53 PM

Score: 0

By TomA102210

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 6:13 PM

By Program86 said:

"try and get into my machine f8888s! I have a few surprises waiting for you..."
-----------------------------------------------I find your comment rude and offensive and request that Beta News remove same, immediately.

Score: 0

By tscar13

posted May 2, 2008 - 7:49 AM

"First of all. that's BN for you. Expect only the "lowest standards" in writing."

I demand that BN removes this now because it it rude..oh wait..I said that..nevermind.I was wrong (saying I'm sorry to myself) :)
Have a nice day:)

Score: 0

By ingram091

posted May 1, 2008 - 3:19 AM

Well must be nice to live in a convent. Anyone that has to live in this society such as it is, knows that these little words float around the wind like ... air... Now the fact that a little insiginificant word being read or heard offends you. Hey so be it. What you going to do. Slit the throat of anyone that says it ever anywhere in the world? Then your just as idiotic as the arab nuts who kill for not believing in their version of imaginary deity.. It offends you , fine. Ignore it and move on. The ones using it quit frankly have such a limited vocabulary and understanding of language at all, that its one of their more proactive words. Indeed life without it would cut their ability to communicate entirely. IMHO that may not be a bad thing, but alas I don't rule the world now do I? Nor do I ever plan too. I would just as soon blow my head off then be responsible for the likes of humans on this planet.

Score: 0

By jackamus

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 10:50 PM

awww... someone's virgin eyes got offended. LOL

Score: 0

By djob

edited Apr 30, 2008 - 11:34 PM

Why does a person need to say the word "F__k? Does it make him more of a man? No, it makes him like the little kid that says it just to act "grown-up" It's not that I find the word itself offensive, it is just that there is some one offensive enough to use it. Maybe their vocabulary only supports four letter words?

Score: 0

By jackamus

edited May 1, 2008 - 12:18 AM

WHY? I can't assume another persons intent. But they can say it if they want, and if the staff here wants to censor it sure. If that word bothers you oh well, that is something in your own soul you have to search as to why. Being man, women or child has nothing do with the use of the word.

http://en.wikipedia.org/...ution#Freedom_of_speech

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted May 2, 2008 - 9:53 AM

Freedom of speech is all well and good, but if you noticed the site guidelines betanews staff has a right to remove your post "for any reason".

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted May 2, 2008 - 10:11 AM

That, and one's right to Freedom of Speech stops on another's private property , and BetaNews is the property of INTERCOSMOS MEDIA GROUP (according to whois).

Just because they let us in, doesn't mean they have to let us s*** all over the place. ;)

Score: 0

By TERATOGEN

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 11:49 PM

You are judging a person by one word? Well, looks like you are a “grown up” one. Welcome to the internet kid.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted May 2, 2008 - 9:53 AM

Not judging the person, just his/her post.

Score: 0

By imafurby

posted Apr 30, 2008 - 6:35 PM

Uh oh, the Thought Police are here.

Score: 0