SEO mavens find scraping switches in Bing

By Angela Gunn | Published June 15, 2009, 5:09 PM

Microsoft last week released guidance for webmasters and search-engine optimization strategists, explaining what Bing's up to in the background. A look at the white paper revealed some smart thinking about where viewers' eyes move on a page of search results, as well as a much more determined "scraping" effort than Google currently uses.

Betanews asked Dan Rosenbaum, a New York-based SEO expert, to walk with us through the white paper and note any features or telling omissions that caught his eye. Overall, he says, "the big changes from Google are in the user interface, and they look pretty interesting and effective. [Microsoft] took the standard heat map of a search engine results page and said, 'How can we make that useful?'"

There is currently a trend among search engines (translation: at Google) to derive search results snippets from the content that's right there on the page, rather than from what it found in any <description> metatags it might encounter. That makes for meatier, more relevant snippets, but some sites that optimized for a different search sensibility -- sites that the search engines interpret as simply long content-free lists of products, for instance -- are finding the change dismaying.

Going by what's revealed in the white paper, Rosenbaum says that Microsoft is taking an even more aggressive approach to scraping sites for content. "So," he says, "sites that are upset that search engines are giving readers and prospects 'all the good stuff' will not be made happier by Bing."

But, he adds, not only is the change a win for readers, SEO folk have known for some time that it would be. He cites a recent essay at FutureNow by Jeff Sexton comparing "long" (content-rich, substantiated) and "short" (minimalist, pared down) copy, which says baldly that "content-rich sites typically out-convert minimalist designs because they more completely answer the prospects' questions." Bing and Google both have changed their search underpinning to reflect that; optimizers may find the change "SEO-hostile," as Rosenbaum phrases it, but there's little they can do but live with it.

We both noticed that the language of the white paper was very human-agency-oriented -- "the Bing team chooses," to take but one example. "I'm sure they're trying to automate as fast as they can," Rosenbaum said, "but there wasn't a word about how the Bing team chooses. Based on what? Volume of search? Number of backlinks? Number of clicks from other favored sites? Anchor text? They don't say."

Rosenbaum says that though there's a heavy implication that both the algorithms and the crawlers are essentially unchanged from earlier MSN iterations, "they don't say anything about the inferences drawn by the software at home base." There's no direct discussion of the algorithm, nothing about inbound links; the paper sticks strictly to matters of on-page SEO (that is, what's actually on the page being parsed by the crawler).

"Bing: New Features Relevant to Webmasters" is available in PDF or XPS form from Microsoft.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Bing is getting a lot of attention because it's the default for IE browsers. It should pass Yahoo within a few months if it hasn't already. Great results, and almost as good as Google

Score: 0

|

Compared to google, bing has to improve their seo strategies. Google is open with their serps, but bing is still a hidden box.

http://www.dmaxonline.com

Score: 0

|

A few years ago I was getting very off topic
search results and at first just thought the
page had changed.
Eventually I learned that these pages had
been optimized by essentially pasting the
dictionary into HTML lines that aren't nor-
mally visible in a browser.
So, definitely ignore those lines.
(IIRC I disincluded common words from
those lines to get a useful search.)

Score: 0

|

It reads like it will be a win win situation for users and optimisers. Of course optimisers will become content writers and public relation officers, which, actually, would be a win win win, since website owners would focus on a more precise message, attracting more potential customers and raising conversions. Could it be that Bing is Bling?

Score: 0

|

Faster or more secure? Microsoft publishes IE patch to Automatic Updates

In a pre-emptive strike against a possibly critical future vulnerability, the company issues a patch to a patch that will definitely slow down Internet Explorer.

How RIM can avoid a premature endgame for BlackBerry

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: The conservative strategy put RIM on the map, but today it's making BlackBerry vulnerable to obsolescence.

Is there any sense to Microsoft's 800 layoffs?

Timing is surprising. What do Microsoft executives know that you or I don't?

Apple's App Store hits 100K apps: News or rhetoric?

The iPhone private market now has a catalog of over 100,000 downloadable apps, but it's not an achievement that Apple earned.

New European counterpart to FCC will ensure 'a more neutral net'

Late Thursday night, the ruling telecom administrators of the EU's member nations signed away their final authority to a new entity overseen by the EC.

Verizon Wireless launches new Android, Chocolate, and ruggedized phones

The lower-priced Eris joins the Droid, while the Chocolate gets a touchscreen and more music playback.

Sophos study suggests Windows 7 UAC's default setting is self-defeating

Without any anti-virus installed, a Sophos test showed, User Account Control was only capable of thwarting just one malware package out of ten samples chosen.

Indiscreet tweet trips awareness of Web SSL vulnerability

A group of high-level security engineers had been making progress on thwarting a low-level threat to the Web, until somebody blurted it all out on Twitter.

Is AES encryption crackable?

In a theoretical setting, a team of researchers has discovered what they think could be a flaw that leaves AES encryption open to attack.

New York: Intel's agreements to lower CPU prices led to overcharges

It's a huge legal stretch, but the law may not have another way to estimate just how much OEM purchasing agreements with Intel may have hurt consumers.

Performance drain: The first public perception test of the Windows 7 era

Scott Fulton On Point: The opinion that regular users out there won't care about the changes happening in software even as we speak, is flat wrong.