Login:
Password:

Senate leader does 180, withdraws pro-telco immunity bill

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

December 18, 2007, 10:24 AM

Apparently not having tested the prevailing winds before trying to pull off a launch, the Senate Majority Leader changed course and withdrew the controversial pro-telco FISA amendment from the Senate floor late yesterday.

As the Washington Post reported late yesterday, on the same day that Majority Leader Harry Reid brought to the Senate floor one version of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act amendment bill that granted prosecutorial immunity to telecommunications companies, he withdrew the same bill in deference to another one that omits that grant.

The withdrawal came in the face of spirited opposition that could have grown into a full-fledged filibuster, led by presidential candidate Sen. Christopher Dodd (D - Conn.). The Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee chairman commanded the floor for the entire afternoon and into the evening, before Sen. Reid decided he had heard enough and scuttled the debate. Now, both bills have equal chance of coming before the floor in January, after Congress returns from the holiday recess, though it's uncertain which will take the floor first.

Reid's withdrawal means that Sen. Dodd can go back to campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire, after having vowed yesterday afternoon to stage a filibuster to keep the Intelligence Committee's version of the bill from proceeding to a vote.

The Judiciary Committee, led by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D - Vt.) who opposes immunity for telcos that cooperated with the US Government in warrantless surveillance operations, had previously advanced an alternate version of the bill that offers no such grant. Sen. Reid's procedural move earlier yesterday would have precluded a floor debate on the Judiciary version.

"Everyone feels it would be in the best interest of the Senate if we take a look at this when we come back," the Post quotes Sen. Reid as having stated last night.

In a statement released last night, Dodd said, "Today we have scored a victory for American civil liberties and sent a message to President Bush that we will not tolerate his abuse of power and veil of secrecy. The President should not be above the rule of law, nor should the telecom companies who supported his quest to spy on American citizens...Over the coming weeks I will fight to build support for my amendment to strip immunity from the FISA legislation when the Senate once again considers this matter early next year. I will continue to use every parliamentary tool at my disposal to ensure that the Senate does not enact legal protections to shield from law suits those who violated the privacy rights of our citizens."

The issue of whether telcos receive immunity or not was given elevated importance by President Bush, who in more than one public appearance and press conference has repeated he would not sign into law any amendment to FISA that does not grant immunity to telecom companies.

Add a Comment (7 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By setzek

posted Dec 18, 2007 - 5:14 PM

I say, let's enjoy our communication with each other and not speak in fear of compartmentalized selfish men with unhappy plans. :(

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
AT&T forwards all Internet traffic into NSA
http://prisonplanet.com/...april2006/080406NSA.htm

Whistleblower outs NSA's secret spy room at AT&T
http://www.spamdailynews...h_outs_NSA_spy_room.asp

Love and Love. Everything is made of Love.

Score: 0

By dan-0

posted Dec 18, 2007 - 2:14 PM

WOW. What happens to us when the war ends? do we have rights anymore? will the NSA be spying on my use of the Internet? What will they use against us all will all that has been enacted since 2001? ugh.

Score: 0

By Scary Guy

posted Dec 19, 2007 - 1:56 PM

This assumes the war will end, which it might. However we'll find someone else to fight to make sure there is an evil force overhead. War is peace after all, right?

There is a very good documentary called "The Power of Nightmares". You can watch all three parts here http://www.archive.org/d...ls/ThePowerOfNightmares

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted Dec 18, 2007 - 2:46 PM

Hold on to your tin-foil hat is the only thing I can advise...

Score: 0

By kashin

posted Dec 19, 2007 - 4:01 AM

Yes, anyone who wants their privacy and civil liberties must be wearing a proverbial tin-foil hat of paranoia. Surrender all your rights to your government. It is the patriotic thing to do. It's wrong when other countries like Russia or China spy on their own citizens and violate their civil rights, but when America does it, it's very patriotic to go along with it. I mean, your privacy and rights are no big deal, as long as you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to worry about, right? So wave a tiny American flag in one hand and stick out your other hand so we can stamp a microchip under you skin and a barcode on your forehead!

Score: 0

By Reap_r

posted Dec 19, 2007 - 11:52 AM

You say this in jest but there are already calls by public officials to implant sex offenders. They will only be the first. Then they will realize that they should track terror suspects and x-cons. Then once we swallow that pill in the name of security, it will be time for those who criticise the government, after all, they are only a small step away from terrorism aren't they? It all seems to logical, so necessary, and it is so paranoid to resist their needed reforms to our outdated constitution in the name of security. This further divides those of us who feel that security and liberty need not be mutually exclusive and in cases where they are, liberty must win...every time.

Score: 0

By Scary Guy

posted Dec 19, 2007 - 1:52 PM

Don't forget that quote "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Score: 0