Print this article | E-mail this article | Comment on this article

Sony to Deliver $750 Blu-ray Burner

By BetaNews Staff, BetaNews

July 19, 2006, 12:59 PM

Sony has officially announced its first aftermarket Blu-ray Disc burner for PCs, which is slated to go on sale nationwide in August for $750 USD. The drive BD-R and BD-RE discs, and can store up to 50GB of data -- or four hours of high-definition video at 1080i.

Sony says the BWU-100A can record a single-layer 25GB Blu-ray disc in 50 minutes. DVD and CD burning is also supported. The company is bundling CyberLink's BD Solution with the drive, which will enable customers to burn high-definition content from one of Sony's new HDV camcorders onto a Blu-ray disc. Pre-orders are now being accepted at sonystyle.com.

Add a Comment (88 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 21, 2006 - 11:31 AM

Ya'll have *way* too much time on your hands. ;)

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

edited Jul 21, 2006 - 5:12 AM

Anyone that really thinks HD-DVD stands any chance of winning the format war is is for a shock.

We now know, there is little to differenciate HD-DVD ad Blu-Ray on hardware prices and media prices (if anything Blu-Ray is cheaper hardware with the PS3). There is a table of other key differences here (it's obviously biased in favor of Blu-Ray, but they are still facts).

http://www.blu-raydisc.c...14064/faqs/4/Index.html

For those that want to spout Betamax tripe. Look at the facts about Betamax. Betamax failed for 2 reasons.

1. VHS had longer record time (capacity)
2. VHS had more support from studios (pre-recordered and rentals).

Guess which format has both of these areas sorted out this time around... Blu-Ray has considerably more studio support, and it's got considerably higher capacity.

Go Figure...

Score: 0

By Skizelli

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 4:38 PM

$750, lol. You can build a pretty decent computer with that kind of money. Between the high-priced PS3, not actually "owning" PS3 games, and dropping the UMD format, it's amazing how they haven't cut their own throat yet.

Did I mention the DS is leading the handheld market?

I totally lost any respect I had for Sony.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 6:25 PM

Since when is anyone dropping UMD? I thought it was only the useless UMD movies they were dropping.

Seems lots of people have the blinkers on...

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 6:54 PM

The PSP itself isn't exactly doing that great. When it's gone the UMD format will very likely go along with it. The Universal Disk Format didn't turn out to be very universal at all, sure they are still making games on it because they have no choice really, it's what the PSP uses. As a format though it's already lying in the coffin waiting for the lid to be put on.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 21, 2006 - 5:18 AM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4218320.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4423235.stm
http://www.999today.com/games/news/story/2145.html

Whilst PSP is currently being outsold by Nintendo:DS in some regions, it's certainly not a flop. 10 million units upto October 2005 is not too shabby at all. There seems to be room in the market for both NintendoDS and PSP, as their target audiences are different, think Nintendogs Vs GTS:LS

Score: 0

By DaveBG

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 1:47 PM

Yeah. Now those who support this crappy DVD upgrade called HD DVD had a kick in the butt :)
Their favorite thing lost its only advantage - cheapnes :)

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 2:00 PM

I don't know where you are getting that from but HD-DVD is still cheaper. This is a "PC Burner". Are there any HD-DVD-R burners for computers yet? So what are you basing your pricing on?

Oh, and I wouldn't exactly call $750 for a computer burner "cheap".

Score: 0

By DaveBG

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 2:36 PM

It is 25% cheaper only several days after first BD drives!!! In a few months no one will remember any DVD related thing :D

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 3:23 PM

I still am not following you. This is not a set top player for movies, has nothing to do with them. This is a drive you install in your PC to burn data onto blank discs. Those are always much cheaper than a regular player for your TV. There is no HD-DVD recordable drive out for PCs yet that I am aware of so you can't compare prices until then. Either way, DVD isn't going anywhere for many years. Neither HD-DVD or Blu-Ray is going to replace them any time soon.

Score: 0

By DaveBG

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 4:39 PM

Man i am not comparing it with HD DVD drive. PC BD drives used to be $1000 (999) and now 25% off. Thats what im saying here...
I dont care about players, all i need is extra storage for my PC :) If i need playback for big screen/TV i will use my PC as player.
As for the replace ... ok stick with them, i wont try to convince you :)

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 6:56 PM

What I'm saying is there were no PC BD drives before this one, this is the very first one. They just now announced the price. Where are you getting this 25% off stuff from? You may have seen an early price estimate or something but this is the first time the official price has been announced. Either way $750 is still very expensive and I bet HD-DVD recordable drives for the PC will be a lot cheaper.

Score: 0

By DaveBG

edited Jul 21, 2006 - 7:09 AM

Where do you come from?
Here is some BD devices you will find at leas 10 BD PC Drives here:

Reviews of BD drives, players and media:

Sony:
http://hdtv.engadget.com...bwu-100a-blu-ray-burner/
http://storage.engadget....p-with-blu-ray-reviewed/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...-again-until-october-25/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...vaio-ar-laptop-reviewed/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...p-with-blu-ray-reviewed/

Samsung:
http://storage.engadget....gicstation-mv55-desktop/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...mbo-player-just-in-case/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...ng-the-samsung-bd-p1000/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...s-bd-p1000-launch-party/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...-ray-box-released-early/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...amsung-bd-p1000-exposed/

LG:
http://storage.engadget....burner-headed-to-taiwan/

BenQ:
http://storage.engadget....r-bw1000-blu-ray-burner/

TDK:
http://storage.engadget....dk-reveals-6x-bd-r-disc/
http://storage.engadget....ping-25gb-blu-ray-media/

Plextor:
http://storage.engadget....ray-burner-the-px-b900a/

Primera:
http://storage.engadget....g-er-duplication-system/

Philips:
http://storage.engadget....nnounces-blu-ray-lineup/
http://storage.engadget....-50gb-pc-blu-ray-burner/

Pioneer:
http://storage.engadget....-comes-out-looking-good/
http://hdtv.engadget.com...yer-launch-until-autumn/

Logitec:
http://storage.engadget....ray-disc-drive-for-macs/

IODATA:
http://storage.engadget....brd-am2b-blu-ray-drives/

Panasonic:
http://storage.engadget....hipping-10-june-for-850/

Sharp:
http://www.sharp.co.jp/hi-vision/bd/index.html

Other:
http://www.blu-ray.com/players/
http://www.blu-ray.com/drives/
http://www.blu-ray.com/media/
My post was cut off here...

Score: 0

By deminicus

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 9:20 AM

this is all I have to say
http://www.inphase-technologies.com/index.html

300 gigs per disk, they're gonna get to a terabyte soon. It will take a while before it's affordable for consumers unless you want to sell an organ or 2 to get it now.

Score: 0

By DaveBG

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 2:46 PM

Wow this is so cool! Im lookog foreward for this one :)

Score: 0

By Galway

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 7:28 AM

I must admit, the thought of high capacity disks for general storage is a good move forward. And we are all argueing about what will win and the various reasons.

We can all spout facts and figures, but ultimatly the end user will decide, and the average end user is not equiped to make use of this product at all. HDTV is in no way at the levels to support this product to drive sales, and I think the main use of this in its present form will be people who wants to compile there own disks. My own personal opinion is that duel layer is too unreliable and still only use single layer media because its cheaper, faster and more reliable and cant see this changing unless duel layer media changes.

My opinion is that noone will use this product for backups. streaming over the network to a raid is far far better, more reliable and works perfectly and needs minimal maintainance.

i will mainly use this to backup films from DVD to DivX and shove them on a HD disk untill its full and buy a compatible HD DivX player to run on a normal TV.

When HDTV becomes mainstream then the format war will allready be over and we will be waiting for its replacment.

Score: 0

By KSzostek

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:56 PM

You all forget one thing it is still Sony Why even consider it?

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 5:22 PM

Brand recognition and/or fanboy loyalty. People either think Sony still means quality or they own Sony products already and feel that they have to be loyal to the company.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 6:24 PM

Or perhaps it still does mean quality, and your talking sh1te...

Score: 0

By mshulman

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 7:06 PM

They've been having trouble burning dual layer in production yet they can still sell a consumer burner? I won't be holding my breath.

HD-DVD is better anyway. Better compression, better features (and most are required) and better quality right now from what I've heard and seen. Oh.. and it's cheaper! Better for cheaper.. go figure!

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 2:58 AM

Do you have any evidence to back up those claims?

Better compression.

HD-DVD uses Microsoft VC1, Blue-Ray also uses VC1, or H-264

Better Features:

Features seems like for like between Blu-Ray, unless you can provide any details to your dodgy claims.

Better Quality:

Considering HD-DVD has 60% less storage space. 15/30 vs 25/50 for BluRay). Considering HD-DVD does not support 1080p, only 1080i. I would also like to see what evidence to back up these claims..

Cheaper :

Please show us a cheaper $750 PC HD-DVD burner..

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 1:09 PM

Just to correct some errors you made:

HD-DVD also supports VC1 and H-264. Both formats can use the same codecs, there is no advantage either way.

The HD-DVD format supports 720p, 1080p and 1080i. Again exactly the same as Blu-Ray. No advantage either way.

As for the storage amounts it is true that HD-DVD holds less, but it is more than enough for a movie in HD format. There is no advantage for Blu-Ray with movies, but an advantage for data storage. Depending on reliability which is yet to be determined for either format.

HD-DVD is cheaper to produce because it can use existing fabrication plants with little change. Advantage, the media and players are cheaper. This is a very important point for consumers.

So far they both come out basically even. It's still very early but my money is on HD-DVD in the long run however.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 12:57 PM

HD-DVD has 60% less storage space. 15/30 vs 25/50 for BluRay

Not that I agree or disagree, but getting your math wrong is worse for credibility than typos.

15/30 vs 25/50 is not 60% less, its 40% less than and 60% of.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 1:40 PM

Whoops, well spotted.

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 7:01 PM

Typical, when the fanboys can't think of a good argument they resort to swearing and personal attacks. At least your predictable as always Mark.

Score: 0

By twosheds

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 3:40 PM

The (DL)technology may have halved in price but the media NEVER became affordable. That particular script isn't always followed....

Score: 0

By Banquo

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 4:11 PM

Agreed, I've had a DL capable burner for a long time but I refuse to buy the stupid overpriced media when I can buy two regular DVD-R for next to nothing.

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:15 PM

same applied to RW disc. When CDRW disc came out, it was a great idea, except no one is using it. They were slow and expensive.

Score: 0

By Banquo

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:38 PM

True but the price did eventually come down on them. DL discs have been out a long time and they are still overpriced.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 5:01 PM

The price has come down on CDRWs; but I think they are still overpriced, and never had very good reliability in my experience.

Score: 0

By ModderXManiac

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 3:14 PM

Comeon guys, we all know how this market works, dvd burners started out at $200-$400, same for dual-layer when it came out,(not to mention the $15 prices on the discs usually)but within 3 months, the price of the technology was slashed to half it's beginning retail; you can now get a dual-layer 16x burner for $40, a good one at that.

With higher data rates, substantially higher capacity, and new optic technology to the market, why are you surprised at these prices?! Just wait 6 months and it'll prove to go through the same price pattern of dvd's. I believe it'll be successful, but like all new optical formats before it, it takes time to catch on.

I, personally, have need for discs of this size for backup purposes, because in the end it will always be cheaper than flash or hard disk backup solutions. This is a new format that should be supported, don't bash it for being expensive;you know you'll get it since it's better than HD-DVD. Just don't be an early adopter, I know none of you want to be caught behind too much :P

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 3:41 PM

If capacity were all there were to it then everyone would be using DL media. But despite its price "slashes", DL media is still to expensive per GB.

Also, I think your recall of price drops is a little accelerated/compressed. I can't think of any technology prices that have halved in 3 months, short of error prone clearanced items.

Score: 0

By ModderXManiac

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 4:01 PM

Do you expect me to appologize for a poor sense of time?

I can recall very vividly dual-layer burners dropping price that fast, no joke.And they were of acceptable quality.(Sure, they weren't Plextor, but who really spends that much?!)
I don't know which Best Buy store you purchase over-priced media writers that would testify against my claim, but Newegg and Pricewatch would certainly fit this claim.
"DL media is still to expensive per GB."
As opposed to...What? Hard disk media? With proper care any disc media will outlive hard drives by a long shot, flash is an exception but the issue here is storage capacity per price, indeed.

Score: 0

By Grazer

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 5:11 PM

I can recall very vividly dual-layer burners dropping price that fast
You are seriously considering DL burners independantly from the single layer burners that came before them?

As opposed to...What?
Only Bluray(at newegg)= 1(25gb)for $17=$0.68/GB
Cheapest DL at newegg = 25 for $40 = $0.19/GB
Cheapest SL at newegg = 100 for $26 = $0.06/GB
Cheapest CDR = 100 for $17 = $0.24/GB
250-320GB HDDs at newegg = about $0.30/GB

And the hardrives can be read from written to many many many times. If you used the hard drive twice as much as the discs, I am sure you would have no failures.

So, in conclusion, the only media more expensive than DL per GB are Bluray and CDR., and CDRs are not bought for their large capacities. For Bluray to succeed as a storage medium, I think its media will probably need to be 60% cheaper. Otherwise people will continue to use single-layer DVDs...or maybe HD-DVDs (depending on their pricing).

Backup media must be much cheaper per GB than working media. DVD-DL and Bluray do not fit the requirements. (With frequent backing up, even non-rewriteable single layer DVDs are a bit expensive. After 5x total capacity in backups, harddrives are more economical.)

Score: 0

By wincement

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 3:34 PM

dvd burners started out at $200-$400

Actually... I remember a time when just DVD players were a bargain at $300 a piece.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:03 PM

My original player cost me $379. Didn't get the extended warranty or anything because I knew I'd be able to get another one in a year that was 10 times better and 10 times less expensive.

You play the Early Adopter Game™, you pay. Big time.

Score: 0

By ModderXManiac

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 3:37 PM

Like you said, the price of Blu-Ray is getting the same criticism as DVD's.

I never remember dvd burners being over $450.

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:10 PM

the price of Blu-Ray is getting the same criticism as DVD's

As well as HD-DVD. Don't mistake me to be a Blu-Ray enthusiast. I hope the format dies a bloody death. I just think all the whining about prices is kinda silly.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 4:45 PM

You play the Early Adopter Game™, you pay. Big time.

I bought my first CDRW drive for $600...and it was only 2x write, 2x rewrite, and 6x read. When the first CD-R drive came out at best buy, it was $1700--was 2x write, 1x rewrite, and 4x reader--that could only support ~ 600MB per CD as well (598MB if I recall). It could be much worse...:)

Score: 0

By Grazer

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 5:05 PM

Consumer optical disc tech was newer back then. In some ways you really can't compare the price of 2x/2x/6x CDRW drives to newer optical tech. Look how much hard drives cost 20 years ago, when they were new to the consumer market.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 5:26 PM

"Consumer optical disc tech was newer back then."

Yeah...so were 6-head VCRs, but they only cost $250 brand spankin' new. Besides, isn't the "Blue laser" new technology? Have there been any other "Blu-Ray" optics that I have missed prior to Blu-Ray coming out??

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 7:02 PM

HD-DVD uses a blue laser also, but it's much cheaper.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 5:57 PM

Seriously, there were 6-head VCRs? I mean it, seriously?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 21, 2006 - 9:05 AM

I have one. Toshiba.

Excellent VCR. Was a tad pricey at the time of purchase though. I will likely use it until it dies. I *might* even look into getting it repsired if it does. Kids use it quite a bit...

Score: 0

By Vann

edited Aug 5, 2006 - 2:51 AM

FYI... tapes will stop being produced (VHS) in 3 months due to Blu-Ray and HD-DVD coming out so if you plan to be using any of them then you might wanna by that stuff up soon before it's gone for good sony has taqlked about not making any more movies on VHS so have many other movie production companies not quite sure on blank VHS's but i'm pretty sure those will be going away due to the same issues mainly b/c of the fact that most blank media is made by sony, maxell, and TDK so just letting you know and i am not trying to attack you like all these other people attacking eachother over HD-DVD and Blu-Ray i support both capacity wise Blu-Ray/ game wise also b/c of the release of PS3 but for affordability i might go with HD-DVD so quit fighting about it because your all pretty much right and i am 17 and i can go without fightin and i bet most of you people are in your 30's and have nothing better to do than all that. i just wanted info on Blu-Ray and well got more than i thaught.... thanks for the help people!!!!

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 5:20 PM

That is a very good point.

Score: 0

By crashoverride

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:21 PM

I think I would come closer to buying this and player software than I would a Blueray player.

Score: 0

By Banquo

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:35 PM

With all the DRM I wonder if you can even play retail movies with this, unless you have an HDMI compatible monitor. Personally I'm going to stick with DVD until this mess is sorted out.

Score: 0

By crashoverride

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:57 PM

Well for myself I would be hooking the system that would have this into a HDTV. I realize this wouldn't be the case with everyone but I would assume if not that you would need a HDMI compatible monitor.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:18 PM

[sarcasm]Woohoo, look at that affordable media:[/sarcasm]
from the SonyStyle site:

BNR-50AHE 50GB BD-R Dual Layer Recordable Disc
47.99

BNE-25AHE 25GB BD-RE Rewritable Disc
24.99

BNR-25AHE 25GB BD-R Recordable Disc
19.99

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:54 PM

Not too bad I guess, considering you get 25GB of storage for $20.

Definitely not a disc that you would burn and then throw around in the car to get scratched all to hell though :)

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:54 PM

It was the same story for CDs and DVDs before they took off...

Score: 0

By aredo

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 2:53 PM

Dual Layer DVD discs are far more expensive considering that on average they still cost $3 approx and that's for 8.4GB (0.35$ per gigabyte) Vs $0.06 per gigabyte of a 50GB Dual Layer BD.

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 3:00 PM

I'm getting slightly different numbers than you are:

$47.99 / 50GB = $0.96 per GB

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 2:56 PM

Are you talking for manufacturing or retail? The 50GB blu-ray is almost $1 per GB retail cost....I've never actually looked at how much DVD discs cost...I guess I should hook up that Sony DVD burner I bought last year and do some stuff.

Score: 0

By skorpian

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:18 PM

Any word on how much the blank media's going to be yet? Also, will it support RW or just R only?

Score: 0

By ladylust

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:20 PM

I sell them for about 29.99 each... for the 25GB version.. write once.

Thanks

Score: 0

By Banquo

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:31 PM

It supports BD-R (write once) and BD-RE (Rewritable). Grazer already posted the expected media prices above.

Score: 0

By jibbajabba2

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 1:59 PM

Yay for BetaRay.

Score: 0

By Banquo

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 2:32 PM

Shhh, you'll cause Mark Gulliblespie to show up and start preaching his Sony sermons to us.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 3:42 PM

Bing...

Think what you like, Sony have won the most popular brand, for the 7th year in a row.

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/

People like Banquo hate Sony because they are not an American company. Most normal people however like Sony products...

Score: 0

By Banquo

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 3:58 PM

No, I hate Sony because they are an arrogant company that loves pushing out proprietary high cost formats that hurt consumers (as well as their other famous shennanigans). They are the epitomy of greed. Microsoft is an American company and I don't like them either so don't try and pull that patriotic crap. Here we have another stupid format war, not what we needed. Blu-Ray is WAY overpriced, they can keep it.

Really though, Harris poll? LOL

Score: 0

By wincement

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 3:39 PM

...guess I'm not normal.

Whenever I look at Sony stuff, I just see the same thing over and over again: A really cool, stylish, mildly-functional, overpriced, proprietary status symbol.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:01 PM

What status? Hick?

Score: 0

By Banquo

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:42 PM

Agreed, I do remember when Sony was considered to be top of the line for quality, but that has not been true for a long time. I've found Sony products to be pretty poor quality in recent years, look at their PS2 that dies if you look at if funny. I also had a Sony DVD player that only lasted a couple of years. These days I consider quality to be from companies like Samsung. Sony has simply lost it; they're still a big name though and everyone knows them. That is why people still buy Sony stuff, just because of the name.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 5:39 PM

Please enlighten us about your inside knowledge of PS2 failure rates, I am curious.

My PS2 is now 4 years old, and perfectly. Infact I don't know of anyone's PS2 going bad personally.

Sony have sold 115 million units globally. It does no take an idiot to realise that with 115,000,000 units out there, there will always be warranty failures.

If you want to talk about high failure rates, XBox360 is reported to be close to 10%

Score: 0

By Banquo

edited Jul 19, 2006 - 7:11 PM

I know of six personally that have died early. Most often the lasers going bad. The PS2 is generally a very unreliable system. I realize this is all a waste of time though because you worship all things Sony. I'm still not sure if you're a fanboy or a paid shill. The way you idolize them in every related post on Betanews is a bit beyond belief.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/...tertainment/1113698.stm

http://games.slashdot.or...pl?sid=03/11/07/1854216

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 8:18 AM

LOL, a 5 and a half year old BBC news item to back up your claims. Very credible, is that best you can come up with?

The BBC news item was dated 2 months after the initial console launch, since then, they have produced over 110,000,000 consoles. Do you really think they did not address these issues in the last 5 years...

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 10:04 AM

I've had a PS2 die last year so apparently not, started giving read errors and then quit. G4 did a test of the three major consoles and the PS2 came out by far the worst. Sorry but it's a piece of crap.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 7:49 PM

Wow, can't wait to see what Mark says to that :) (I find this type of debate to be quite amusing...)

Score: 0

By bobthegoat2001

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 2:08 AM

I do too. Post something Mark!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 4:58 PM

80% population = sheep.

They get what they deserve.

(was that a bit too cynical?)

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Jul 19, 2006 - 5:37 PM

Nah...

The hick comment might have been though. I literally laughed out loud when I read that. My co-workers looked up wondering if I was ok.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 21, 2006 - 9:03 AM

My co-workers looked up wondering if I was ok.

I'm sure that's not too unusual. ;)

Score: 0

By Murphmeister

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 2:14 AM

Ahhh Blu Ray, another fantastic innovation from the Japanese giant. We can only hope it's as successful as Sonys' previous ventures - Betamax, Minidiscs and UMD.

But still, the format war will serve us consumers with falling prices and increased standards development that you just don't see in a monopoly. That is, unless you choose Sony and buy a Blu-Ray player, which will be a rather expensive paperweight in two years when HD-DVD conquers Blu-Ray. When will Sony learn that nobody wants their poor quality, overpriced, proprietary formats?

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 3:04 AM

Again someone that seems to think Betamax has some relevance to Blu-Ray. It's over 30 years ago.

You also forget the Sony formats that did succeed.. CD, FloppyDisk etc..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Format_war

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 10:08 AM

The CD is not a Sony format, Philips made it. Sony was only a partner. We're talking about formats that Sony themselves created. Most of them are proprietary and most of them have flopped in the market.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 1:37 PM

So it's OK to use the argument that Sony developed Blu-Ray with Philips (amongst many others), but not that they developed the CD format with them??

Score: 0

By wincement

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 12:55 PM

Well... by definition, when creating a new storage technology like this, it's going to be "proprietary."

Normally, I would agree with you, though. Sony is notorious for making stuff that only works with other Sony products.

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 1:37 PM

Well not really, since anyone could make CD players when the format came out, and anyone could make VHS players. When CD-R came out there were tons of manufacturers making media and drives, and they were all compatible. Sony usually wants to have complete control over their formats and either won't allow others to use it or try to charge ridiculous amounts to license it.

For a good current example look at memory sticks. They only work in Sony products and they are priced outrageously when compared to other flash media formats. Then there is UMD which recently died as a movie format. They called it universal but the only thing it worked in was the PSP. The floppy disk was an exception because Sony did not make computers at that time. Apple adopted them and later IBM, and by nature PCs are very open. Years later they did try to come up with a replacement for the floppy called Hi-FD. It was unreliable and died a swift death.

Score: 0

By Vann

posted Aug 5, 2006 - 3:18 AM

if you read a little more about UMD it is univeral meaning universally able to hold any fromat and play any fromat.... try reading up on some more stuff like that and go to college or maybe finish high school so you have something better to do like go to work... do you live with your mom? i mean come on dude i'm 17 and probably had more job offers than you i've had 4 offers from HP 2 from microsoft 3 from linux/unix 3 from intel 2 from IBM and last but not least your favorite to yell and rant about 3 offers from sony read more and learn something so you have something behind what your saying so you can have room to talk other than that 5" x 14" keyboard your typing on that is probably still running on a 354 made in the 80's that my dad probably made when he worked for HP over 10 years ago....

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 6:23 PM

"Well not really, since anyone could make CD players when the format came out, "

How much more BS do you want to spout? To make a CD player, you have to pay Philips money, and they have to accept you onto the licencing scheme.

http://www.licensing.phi...2&filename=4454.pdf

http://www.licensing.phi...2&filename=4454.pdf

Actually when CD format was released, there was only a handfull of companies licenced to make them, Sony, Philips, Marantz (division of Philips), plus a couple of others I forget. It took at least 18months before they opened the licences to other manufacturers.

I suggest keeping quiet, and stop yourself looking like a clueless newbie.

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

edited Jul 21, 2006 - 12:09 PM

"Sony usually wants to have complete control over the format and either won't allow others to use it or try to charge ridiculous amounts to license it."

What a load of tripe. Does anyone here talk sense?

http://en.wikipedia.org/...lu-ray_Disc_Association

and the 170 members (of which Sony is just 1):

http://www.blu-raydisc.c...ection-14009/Index.html

Score: 0

By Murphmeister

posted Jul 20, 2006 - 7:15 PM

And how do you (Sony Fanboy) know that Sony aren't charging ridiculous amounts?

Score: 0

By Vann

posted Aug 5, 2006 - 3:19 AM

go back to highschool and learn some grammar it's isn't**...

Score: 0

By Mark Gillespie

posted Jul 21, 2006 - 3:25 AM

You really don't get it do you.

Sony are not the sole owner of Blu-Ray technology. Whilst you will have to pay someone a licence to make a Blu-Ray drive, it won't be Sony directly, it will be BDA.

http://www.blu-raydisc.info/

Score: 0

By Vann

posted Aug 5, 2006 - 3:26 AM

though you froget sony did coin, copyright, TM, and reserve all rights for Blu-Ray and it was originally made for the PS3 coming out and saw that it would be neat to be able to fit movies onto that in pure HD for the consumer because everyone is flipping out over it "i have to get an HD TV or i might die" chill out i support sony they are good when it comes to games, they are also good when it comes to display's but most other stuff i agree they do kinda suck but microsoft is worse they have to change things so much they might as well be AOL or NOW that's what i call music it's all versions or beta's to these people why don't they just make something revoltionary and stop with that if they need to make a couple changes then do soin some ways

Score: 0

By Alex Stevens

edited Jul 20, 2006 - 2:03 PM

I didn't mention Blu-Ray anywhere in my post. I am well aware of what companies also support Blu-Ray. I've read all about both formats so save your links and your insults. I was talking about Sony's history of proprietary formats.

Score: 0

Oct 11 - 11:16 AM ET Things left unsaid, in a recent interview with Sony's CEO

Oct 11 - 11:03 AM ET EU regulations block Italian ISPs from blocking Pirate Bay

Oct 11 - 10:55 AM ET Making it to Apple's App Store by staying out of court

Oct 10 - 7:43 PM ET Wal-Mart changes its mind, leaves existing DRM servers up

Oct 10 - 7:05 PM ET Hands on: An amateur photographer tests out Adobe's latest Lightroom

Oct 10 - 6:52 PM ET Mobile service providers brace for the economic storm

Oct 10 - 6:24 PM ET Apple warns users about bad Nvidia graphics chips

Oct 10 - 4:21 PM ET New Norton Vista tool trades UAC for online feedback

Oct 10 - 3:23 PM ET Verizon Wireless to raise fees for service-related texts

Oct 10 - 3:04 PM ET BlackBerry Bold sales halted in UK