Login:
Password:

T-Mobile Bets on Wi-Fi, Drops Zeta-Jones

By Ed Oswald, BetaNews

September 26, 2006, 3:39 PM

Fresh off a major spectrum grab at the recent wireless frequency auction, T-Mobile USA plans to step up efforts to gain new customers and separate itself from its competition. The changes will also include the exit of Catherine Zeta-Jones as T-Mobile's spokeswoman, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

The nation's fourth biggest wireless carrier will introduce new phones as early as next month that can use Wi-Fi hotspots in order to make phone calls. Sources have told BetaNews that the company had been testing the phones in the Oregon/Washington area since mid-summer, and although buggy at first, the service had generally worked well.

It is likely that the same area is where the service would be launched initially. Wi-Fi support would require an additional service plan, as well as a special router and phone. In tests, sources told BetaNews that a Samsung SGH-T709 along with a provided D-Link TM-G5240 router was used.

Although its not immediately clear, the WSJ speculates that T-Mobile could offer a VoIP service much like Vonage, which would also entice subscribers away from landline phones. The paper said T-Mobile holds a special advantage since doing so would not cannibalize other parts of its business.

For example, Sprint and Verizon stand to hurt their landline and long distance businesses if they would attempt to lure users away from traditional phone service. The dual-mode phones would automatically switch between Wi-Fi and GSM signals seamlessly.

T-Mobile stands to benefit from such a setup. Through design, GSM signals typically have a harder time making it through the walls of buildings. Thus, in places with a compatible router, or a T-Mobile Hotspot, the service would boost the signal for the carrier's users.

In addition to the Wi-Fi service, the carrier also plans to introduce a new service dubbed "My Favs." Similar to the "My Circle" program recently announced by Alltel, T-Mobile subscribers would be able to select up to five numbers to be added to their unlimited calling plan.

Sources told the WSJ that the service was being tested in the Northwest, and could go nationwide soon. Still unknown is T-Mobile's exact plans for the spectrum it had acquired through the FCC auction.

With all the changes also comes a switch in advertising strategy. Since the days when T-Mobile was VoiceStream, the company has built its campaigns around a spokesperson - first Jamie Lee Curtis, and now Catherine Zeta-Jones.

Now, however, the company apparently plans to use a "man on the street" concept to promote its products. While Zeta-Jones may still appear in ads for the immediate future, it is expected she would be phased out by next year.

Add a Comment (28 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By Hellcat_M

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 10:27 PM

T-Mobile in CA sucks, I never had them but know people who were suckered into it by their prices and feel sorry for it. Maybe they'll be like Sprint, in the begining they sucked and they got better, but then again maybe Cingular will buy them. T-Mobile has the Sidekick which is the only good phone they have. Once the contract us up that they are the only company to have it, they'll be in trouble.

The whole reason for any company having a celeberty spokesperson is for people to identify with that person. Now a day people identify mostly with people from TV/movie/music. A lot of people look at her and say "she wouldn't be a spokesperson for a company she doesn't believe in" or "if they have Catherine Zeta-jones they must be good" and they get sucked into that frame of mind.

I like Sprint and Cingular. The main thing I miss about Cingular is the Sim card, but Sprint has good service. Verizon I've never been with, but I've heard horror stories about their cell and land line service. It just seems like they have to be more for the people and less for themselves because they're prices are higher and their customer support from what I hear sucks.

I think it would be best if Sprint bought Verizon (if it were the other way around I would probably dump them) and Cingular should buy T-mobile. There would only be 2 major companies against each other but Sprint and Verizon use the same technology and Cingular and T-mobile use the same technology. It would be in the cusomers best interest of a merger because then there would be a merger of cell sites. Or if a company came out that used both CDMA and GSM system on their phone. Many technologies are merging and it works well. CD's can be read on DVD players, I hear that companies may make HD-DVD and Blueray compatable players that will also read DVD and CD. It would be best if GSM and CDMA could be put in one phone. BUT from what I understand at some point we'll have Wi-Fi towers up instead of cell towers and all phones will be VoIP, home a cell so only time will tell what will happen.

Score: 0

By KSzostek

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 8:31 AM

I am a T-Mobile user.
There problem isn't their spokesperson it is their lack of good phones and services.
They have no free early evening plan (7:00pm) The phone choices are a joke.
Their customer service is pretty good but tech support is a waste of your time.
Get a clue T-Mobile you have deeper problems.

Score: 0

By Desides

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 4:47 PM

I'm a T-Mobile user, too. I have no problems with the service, especially since they signed that roaming agreement with Cingular.

Phone selection is an issue, but guess what--all cell phones suck! I almost want Apple to make that damned iPhone just so cell phone UI and design will get a kick in the pants.

Score: 0

By Daddy_Spank

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 4:33 PM

I think if any carrier has problems with their phones its verizon... never saw a phone I liked in their store. Whats the poing of having to be the most expensive carrier because of EVDO if your phones suck... And NO, with CDMA you cant just put your sim card into any phone you like (unlocked).

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 6:40 AM

tmob needs to fix it's texting. Many of my friends with it get my texts hours, sometimes half a day later than I send it. No other carrier has issues.

Score: 0

By Daddy_Spank

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 4:31 PM

I used to have that problem a while ago, but it dissapeared when I got a new phone. I used to have the Ipaq phone, now I have the MDA and i never had an issue with txt to any carrier

Score: 0

By googun

edited Sep 27, 2006 - 5:31 AM

Zeta-Jones is certainly attractive but what the hell does she know about mobile technology, and why should I attach any value to what she says or recommends on the subject of mobiles?
Yes, Nokia gained by association with a famous babe, but isn't that a trite, superficial and unimaginiative way to sell products to us.

Score: 0

By foxfyre

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 9:04 AM

You missed the point. What celebrity spokeperson ever knows much abiut a product?

T-Mobile is a rebranded name of the consolidation of Deutsche Telephon after they bought VoiceStream to enter into the US market. The then spkkesperson for Voicestream was Jamie Lee Curtis - a recognizable face in the states but unknown in the rest of their world market! Hence the appeal of Catherine Zeta Jones and her world wide appeal - especially as she was signed right when Zorro was hot. Hence her appeal at the time.

They are selling to a worldwide market, not just the states!

Score: 0

By googun

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 10:26 AM

No, I've not missed the point. Zeta-Jones is a well-known figure who can front a product on a global basis, so I agree with what you say. I just don't like being sold things via celebrity endorsement/promotion. Incidentally, I'm in UK not USA. For what it's worth, I didn't even know Zeta-Jones was with Nokia until I read the story here. So despite her huge celebrity status, Nokia missed me completely, and I'm a Nokia customer.

Score: 0

By foxfyre

edited Sep 27, 2006 - 12:45 PM

You don't have to agree with me! I simply repeated T-Mobile's stated reason for the change!

And secondly, she is NOT a spokesperson for Nokia! I don't think the problem is with Nokia, its with you thinking Catherine Zeta Jones has anything to say to you on behalf of Nokia!

Good, you wait for an engineer to hit you with some technobabble explanation followed by an economist who will explain a detailed cost-benefit return on investment analysis designed to stimulate your and everyone else's appetite.

And while you're at it, wait for a politician to provide an analysis independent of their vested interests who will tell you what must be done even if it is some difficult task that will cause short term hardship.

Score: 0

By ds0934

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 8:38 AM

Because it has been proven every single time that a pretty woman sells products better than some guy with tape-up glasses and a pocket protector.

Score: 0

By googun

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 10:35 AM

That's so true. A product promoted by someone famous is more likely to get my attention, but only in the "Jeez, what's he/she trying to sell me now?" sense.

Score: 0

By AntiochMedia

posted Sep 26, 2006 - 8:26 PM

I like what alphatrigon said -- Catherine Zeta Jones IS lovely... there's just something pleasant about her being involved in the ad campaigns. If anything, T-Mobile's image with her vs. (as example) the Verizon's "The Network" people ... I like Catherine Zeta Jones way more hands down -- it's a friendly, well-recognized face as opposed to some hired guy who is bragging about a vague term in a bunch of extremely lame commercials.

I think that we need to petition T-Mobile =).

I'm a T-Mobile subscriber and have their hotspot access. Their customer service has always been nice and I've had them since before Voicestream. I've never had problems and have changed my plans many times without difficulty, ordered several phones from them, and rescued my wife from Cingular and added her to my plan. In the Dallas / Fort Worth area, T-Mobile is great. If were were in DC ... it might be Verizon for us or Sprint (as both have perks such as Verizon actually working in the metro system)

Nextel was killed by Sprint?

I'm rambling.

Score: 0

By alphatrigon

edited Sep 26, 2006 - 6:47 PM

lol...almost sounds like the crew at betanews is getting a little loose and telling jokes.

Ahhh, humor and easy going...does a body good.

But I must say you'd be crazy to ditch Zeta Jones....she's lovely :D

Score: 0

By SrLnclt

posted Sep 26, 2006 - 6:51 PM

Actually I'm glad to hear this - I find her annoying as hell in those ads.

Score: 0

By ds0934

edited Sep 27, 2006 - 8:39 AM

They should get the GoDaddy woman to do their selling now!!!

Can you see it?: She can say "Get more... oops!" and her halter strap falls down. Then cars start crashing into each other outside the window. Man, I should be in marketing...

Score: 0

By gawd21

edited Sep 26, 2006 - 9:24 PM

I second that! I just like the service and price. Those are the reasons I am with T-Mobile. After 7 years with Sprint and less than one with Crapular, I had to find something that was worth the money. Sprint USE TO BE.

Score: 0

By smarterthanyou

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 2:16 AM

Why would anyone want to go with Sprint vs AT&T Wireless/Cingular? Sprint's network has never equaled or exceeded the quality of AT&T's network. Before GSM in the USA, AT&T Wireless's TDMA network easily outperformed Sprint and Verizon's CDMA networks in both reliability and quality of service. Now GSM 1900MHz and especially GSM 850MHz are outperforming Sprint and Verizon's CDMA networks for voice service quality and reliability once again.

T-Mobile by far has the worst coverage in the USA due to their lack of GSM 850MHz service and has no clue when it comes to data services.

Score: 0

By Daddy_Spank

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 4:26 PM

Tmobile has expanded their coverage area by 30% (!) so far this year, and that was all done with 850 MhZ network. As for data service, I dont know what you are talking about. EDGE has been available so far every place that I go. And for $19.90 per month (I still have the old plan) I get unlimited internet access. Please tell me another provider that offers something even close to that. CDMA is in my opinion just a waste of money, as there is gonna be 4G ready by the times the phones reach a level that they actually can utilize such bandwith in a useful way.

Score: 0

By smarterthanyou

posted Sep 28, 2006 - 2:18 AM

Cingular has far superior data service in the form of HSPDA/UMTS. In many cases EDGE still operates at near dialup speeds. Cingular's 3G service also lets you browse the web and be on a phone call at the same time. Can T-Mobile do that?

As for voice coverage, Cingular has the largest digital network in the USA. In fact, in many areas T-Mobile has roaming agreements with Cingular to make up for their lack of coverage. 2G CDMA has always been crappy for voice calls, but wide band CDMA is the best technology available.

Score: 0

By Desides

posted Sep 28, 2006 - 11:08 AM

"Cingular's 3G service also lets you browse the web and be on a phone call at the same time. Can T-Mobile do that?"

That's perhaps the most useless feature I have ever heard of.

Score: 0

By foxfyre

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 9:06 AM

Can we say "The inability to make calls from inside the house with Cingular!?" And their tech support mantra that they have never before heard such a complaint!

Personally, I got damned tired of having to go outside and site in my car in order for it to act as a sympathetic antenna in order to boost the apparent signal strength!

Score: 0

By smarterthanyou

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 2:05 PM

Not being able to make calls from inside buildings can happen with any mobile phone company. Cingular is much more prompt about fixing such reception problems than other carriers. In August I bought Cingular's LG CU500 HSPDA phone and was unable to make calls inside my house. One week later the problem was solved. Not only that, but I no longer have dropped calls when the phone switches from a 3G tower to an EDGE/GSM tower.

Score: 0

By 33Nick

posted Sep 26, 2006 - 4:54 PM

I've been thinking about switching to T-Mobile since the killing of Nextel by Sprint. This loogs good. The little guys always trying to outdo to big ones.

If only they had more Mac compatible phones!

Score: 0

By fareal

edited Sep 26, 2006 - 6:19 PM

i've also been thinking about switching to t-mobile, but the big vzw has me in a contract til next year some time.

Score: 0

By frankwick

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 3:20 PM

I actually like Sprint now.

Score: 0

By smarterthanyou

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 2:17 AM

Why develop more Mac compatible phones when most people don't even use Macs?

Score: 0

By Desides

posted Sep 27, 2006 - 4:49 PM

Because the Mac market is growing?

A better question is why would a business intentinoally limit itself to a certain market if they're perfectly capable of servicing others.

Apple really needs to release that damned iPhone.

Score: 0