Login:
Password:

Tablet PC Platform in Trouble?

By Ed Oswald, BetaNews

August 30, 2005, 5:18 PM

Once heralded by Microsoft chairman Bill Gates as the future of portable computing, Tablet PCs now appear to be a niche market that has slim prospects for significant growth even through the end of the decade.

Forecasts at the time of the Windows XP Tablet Edition launch expected sales to hit 5 million in 2005, 9 million in 2006, and 14 million by 2007. However, sales so far this year are not even in line to hit one million.

Roger Kay, founder of Endpoint Technologies Associates and an IDC analyst, says indications are that sales of tablets will only amount to about 3.5 million by 2009.

In contrast, a recent projection by IDC said that Tablet PC units should reach 14 million by 2009.

Gartner has also lowered its projections and is expected to release revised forecasts shortly. Gartner projects that between 1.6 and 7.2 million units could be sold in 2009, with 3.5 million units the most likely scenario, similar to Kay's current forecast.

"Alternative form factors have arisen to handle some of the demand that might potentially have gone to tablets, form factors such as Blackberries and converged phones," Kay wrote. "Mobility is clearly important, and yet there are a number of possible ways of getting a good mobile computing experience."

Walt Mossberg, technology columnist for the Wall Street Journal, offered some suggestions on what the Tablet PC industry needs to do to make the units more appealing.

"Until somebody does a better job of designing hardware controls aimed specifically at tablet users, I believe tablets will remain niche products, even when they are sized right," Mossberg said.

Microsoft remains committed to the Tablet PCs and says it continues to invest heavily in the platform, stating that the units are selling just fine.

However, the company would not comment on why analysts have begun to scale back their once-lofty sales projections for Tablet PC systems.

Add a Comment (28 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By donald_the_duck

posted Sep 6, 2005 - 3:06 PM

The pure tablets which tend to be lower powered, smaller and lighter, and the convertibles serve different requirements. I'm glad they both exist. Ideally I'd love to be able to afford to buy a pure laptop and a pure tablet so I could carry around a small light machine when I just want a notebook/sketchbook, but I've found the Tecra M4 serves me admirably. It's only drawback is that I wouldn't want to have to stand and use it for long, but it is rare I'm not working at a table somewhere. Otherwise it is powerful and will give any pure laptop out there a good run. Two years ago I wouldn't have touched the tablets - they were horribly expensive and very slow. Things have changed dramatically.

You pay extra for the Tecra M4, but I'd be paying a few hundred dollars for a similar Wacom pad anyway, and I wouldn't get the ease of drawing directly, plus I'd have to haul around the pad with my laptop.

For me drawing is a hobby and I actually went tablet for the ease of taking notes. I no longer have to go through the hassles of scanning my design notes - I invariably end up with notes that need to be sliced up which is really easy when it is all already digital. It is rare I actually need any sort of handwriting recognition because I just keep everything as ink. If my notes were going to be transcribed from paper they can just as easily be transcribed from digital paper.

One thing I really like is being able to annotate documents on my computer instead of printing them first so I can annotate with a pen.

Score: 0

By PC Rat

edited Aug 31, 2005 - 8:01 PM

Problem with Tablet PC's is that nobody wants to use 'em ! ( As Apple found out several years ago. )

They're an ingenious solution to a non-existent problem. If Microsoft doesn't pay more attention to the personal computer market, they'll end up in the music business like Apple !

The Computer Rodent

Score: 0

By donald_the_duck

posted Sep 6, 2005 - 3:09 PM

The problem with Newton was different. And Apple didn't stick with it. On the other hand you'll still find people who have a Newton, still use it and think it is great.

Score: 0

By fewt

posted Sep 1, 2005 - 6:52 AM

I would love to use one, but I'm not really interested in a tablet that's slower than the slowest laptop on the market. I want to see more value than just a glorified college ruled notebook too.

I want a $1000 laptop with a 3500+ / 512 / 80GB and a 15.4" turnable writable surface.

I'd buy it.

Score: 0

By Thunderbuck

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 3:39 PM

Interesting that Fujitsu has released a new touch-screen tablet-STYLE PC, but running plain XP Pro (rather than Tablet edition). They claim the different operating system is to save costs.

If MS REALLY wants to drive adoption of this platform, why don't they discount the O/S price to OEMs?

I'd love to TRY a Tablet; I think this is probably what all notebooks will wind up being eventually, but the $$$ is still a real barrier for me.

Score: 0

By fibreiv

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 10:28 AM

I love the tablet pc's. I am posting this on an HP TC1100 tablet right now. I will admit that not everyone finds a use for them but being a network admin I find it very hand to be able to take this computer with me everywhere I go. With it's builtin wireless and how lite it is it just rocks. I have had all of the fancy PDAs and such but you can't beat a full computer that you can carry like a notebook.

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 10:11 AM

Here's a counter argument:

http://www.eweek.com/art...2/0,1895,1853696,00.asp

Score: 0

By ServerMechanic

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 9:54 AM

Cool. Finally people are seeing the light. I've been telling people that Tablet PC's suck. I've been saying it ever since they came out. They are a joke. Personally I don't think there is a place for them at all. Either use a PDA or a Blackberry or use a Laptop.

They are smaller, have smaller screens, break more easily.....

JUNK

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 10:02 AM

So, you've actually used a tablet pc?

Score: 0

By kashin

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 1:08 PM

Of course he hasn't. It's easy to badmouth something simply because it's made by Microsoft, even if it's a good product. Reminds me of all the PS2 owners badmouthing Xbox, eventhough they never tried one.

Score: 0

By ServerMechanic

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 1:14 PM

Actually I've used 4 different Tablet PC's.

I work in a hospital and they still don't work well here.

Hahahahaha! You can shut your mouth now jack@sses.

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 2:03 PM

All I did was ask a question. Grow up!

Score: 0

By ServerMechanic

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 2:36 PM

All I did was answer a question. Grow up!

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Sep 4, 2005 - 7:38 PM

No, all you did was act like an ass.

Score: 0

By chriswong

edited Aug 31, 2005 - 7:15 AM

The reason is simple: they just don't match up to laptops and desktops in terms of power and features. They are approached by manufacturers as needing to be in the same category as their respective thin-and-light series of notebooks. If more powerful models were available, I'm sure sales would increase as most buyers feel that these would be a secondary computer used only for mobile situations rather than as a primary computer for every day use...

Score: 0

By Geckoboy86

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 9:38 AM

I am with chriswong on this.
Compared to a laptop they are nothing.
The reason I dun have one is the fact that most have no Cd tray in them. I dun want to carry around an external drive. And another factor is price. Most range above 1200.
I am sorry but i get get a way better laptop for 400 less so i will take the laptop.

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 10:03 AM

They don't have a cd drive??? Strange, mine does, and so do most on the market.

Score: 0

By GeorgeSantayana

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 2:33 AM

What's the point of these, really?

Ok, I understand that they're useful for surveyors, RE appraisers, pilots, artists and in hospital settings. But just to take notes? Why not just buy a gazillion paper notepads for the price and run them through an autofeed scanner? It would seem to be a lot cheaper.

Score: 0

By ogman

edited Aug 31, 2005 - 10:09 AM

Just one question, does anyone believe anything from Gartner anymore? I mean c'mon, "between 1.6 and 7.2 million units could be sold in 2009?" My dog could make that prediction! And Mossberg obviously has no idea how to use a tablet, or he would know that the have great controls that are specific to the platform. I use one daily, and while my peers search for their notes and carry around recorders for lectures, I boot up my tablet, record the lecture direct to the tablet AND take digital notes tha are nicely organized into the machine.

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 1:12 AM

I'm in an industry that takes notes constantly, in almost all instances during meetings: legal. We take notes meeting with clients, vendors, each other, etc. We trialed a few of these from HP and we found that the process of taking notes on a tablet was cumbersome and anti-productive. The "notes" actually had to be babysat when transferred to other applications. For instance when one takes notes, they cover a lot more or just a little less than what they get out of the meeting. An attorney would have to determine what was applicable to transfer with this system, and the transcription from computer to computer was actually slower and more confusing than from paper to computer. We also saw that the laptops could not take rotating the screen continually. After 3 months we saw display corruption because of the abuse. Attorneys started asking for standard laptops that had more standard features that they were used to.

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 2:08 AM

Sounds like some user issues there. I watch freshman college students use these things all the time and they have no problem.

Score: 0

By zridling

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 12:55 AM

Dell could reverse this trend in a month if it would come out with a decent Tablet PC. Once you use Microsoft OneNote on a tablet, you can't believe how fun it is.

Score: 0

By zee7

posted Aug 30, 2005 - 11:24 PM

Agreed. I'm heavily into graphics and would've bought a tablet PC along time ago if they weren't so expensive. If/when the prices come down, I probably won't want one anymore. There are too many other tech toys competing for my dollars.

Score: 0

By heybirder

posted Aug 30, 2005 - 8:51 PM

Tablets are pretty decent. Some coworkers use the hp model and they love it for taking notes and docking afterwards.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Aug 30, 2005 - 7:26 PM

LOL... Yes, sales are low for a relatively new technology (largely because it's expensive) and it automatically spells doom for it. Yeah, OK...

I'm planning on buying a Toshiba Satellite R10 within a month, and I expect to be using it frequently as a college student and as an a computer guy.

Score: 0

By ogman

posted Aug 31, 2005 - 2:09 AM

You and alot of others! The new Toshiba models with the lower price tag seem to be driving a surge.

Score: 0

By BarHBar

edited Sep 7, 2005 - 10:32 PM

Had a Fujitsu 4110 for the last two years, love it and use it every day. Now I want something with more horse power and larger screen. I have spent the last 6 days going over "all" the convertibles and a few of the slates. I think the Tecra M4 is the choice, a little heavy but It will be on a desk 99.9%. I looked pretty hard at the IBM 41 but did not like the external CD/DVD. If price is not the object (within reason)$2-$3k, can I get a few opinions from people that actually have bought a convertable and their thoughts??

Score: 0

By CharlieT

edited Sep 8, 2005 - 2:17 PM

BarHBar, you can find some useful opinions at http://www.tabletpcbuzz.com/forum/

Score: 0