Top 5 non-obvious feature enhancements to Office 2010
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published July 15, 2009, 10:40 PM
The question has been asked, who really needs to use Microsoft Office these days? The answer is, anyone who is in the business of professionally generating content for a paying customer. Word 2010 may not be the optimum tool for the everyday blogger, and Excel 2010 maybe not the best summer trip planner, just as a John Deere is not the optimum vehicle for a trip to the grocery store. But in recent years, Microsoft is the only software producer that has come close to understanding what professional content creators require in their daily toolset.
So far, the improvements we've found from actually using the Office 2010 Technical Preview released Monday (as opposed to the ones Microsoft told us about) can mainly be described as usability enhancements -- tools that appear to be responses to how people actually use the products. Compared to Office 2007, which threw out the old instruction manual with regard to how applications should work, Office 2010's changes are subtler, slicker, and less ostentatious. Of those we've noticed in our initial tests, here are five which we feel will make compelling arguments for at least some users to upgrade:
5. Embedding Web videos in PowerPoint presentations. Technically, it's possible to embed a YouTube video into a PowerPoint 2007 presentation, but you need a third-party plug-in to pull it off. Otherwise, PowerPoint is only geared to play locally accessible files, essentially using a Media Player component.

One of the very few functional changes to PowerPoint 2010 is the addition of a mechanism that enables you to embed YouTube and other videos into a presentation the same way you'd embed them into a Web page: by copying the HTML <EMBED> code directly in. PowerPoint 2010 (gauging from the Technical Preview) will allow you to preview the video in-place without having to view the presentation as a slideshow first, which demonstrates the depth of functionality Microsoft truly intends for this component -- apparently an in-place Adobe Flash object. It will be even nicer when this feature works; in our tests, the new component often did not locate the video online and looked for it in the "My Documents" directory instead.
4. Restrict Editing command in Word 2010. Many publishing organizations use Word as their principal tool for editing textual content, which means collaborators shuttle multiple documents between authors, editors, and proofreaders. Microsoft's collaboration tools are supposed to enable only certain parties to make changes. But in the publishing business, formatting codes are the keys to the final formatting of a production document, and if someone who has access rights can change those paragraph formats, even accidentally (which is easier to accomplish than you might imagine, thanks to customizable document templates belonging to each user), the entire production process can be held up, sometimes for days, while formatters work out the kinks.
This simple tool may go a long way toward preventing these kinks from popping up. On a per-user basis, Restrict Editing (located in the Developer panel, which is not displayed by default) can prevent named individuals from making certain types of changes to a document, even if he's generally permitted to make changes. Among the available restrictions are changes to styles, which creates the possibility for a safeguard that publishers can use to prevent authors from changing manuscripts willy-nilly to suit their tastes. (Can you tell I've been in the editing business?)
Next: Does Scott get his #1 Office 2010 wish?
I couldn't help but chuckle when I saw your "plug" (I use the word completely loosely) for your book and saw this review:
"This book is extremly hard to read. It does not cater to the novice or professional programmer. Basically, it is the most confusing book I have ever read. It tries to use senseless analogies to make obvious points, which were probably added to "pad" the book.
AVOID THIS BOOK. "
Hehe. I've never read the book but I think you're improving since I can't say the same about your articles :)
Score: 0
|a skilled writer simply needs a typewriter and sheet(s) of paper.
however, this is somewhat fundemental because the above could only apply to real experts and from the last century..
but it can also be used to measure how just many tools can be added to the two requirements before too many enhancements is overkill.
msword of today is a compilation, incorporating a variety of disciplines into one program, resulting in a bloated program that consumes much disk space and resources.
i've been using word for many years, ever since microsoft sabotaged word perfect. and still i only use a dozen or so of the features in word for all my researchl and regular writing needs.
take for example the "developer" feature.
is it really necessary to include a "developer" feature?
if so, then who would use it, the professional journalist, a researcher or a programmer?
Score: -3
|I use a product that provides online editing and collaboration of Excel files today. I hope 2010 is a good. www.expressocorp.com
Score: 0
|There are at least 2 free addons and 1 commercial addon that add classic menus and toolbars yet people continue to whine. Search for UbitMenu or RibbonCustomizer (Starter Edition is free) or AddinTools Classic Menu for Office. And document compatibility is not going to change, 2010 in fact is fully OpenXML ISO standard compliant and Microsoft has said it will update 2007 OpenXML support for ISO compatibility. No one is forcing you to update or stop using free programs if they meet your needs, however as of today OpenOffice 3.0 is miles behind in terms of features compared to Microsoft Office and years behind in terms of usability/user interface is horrible looking.
Score: 2
|No classic interface = no buy. Period. End. Microsoft's PM's are childish on this issue. Ribbon is horrific.
Score: -4
|only because you are used to the classic buttons. for a new user i think the ribbons make sense. unfortunately the curse of microsoft office is that EVERYONE knows the old version so the ribbons make things hard to find.
Score: 2
|I still prefer free office suites. With this new MS office we are all going to suffer with document compatibility. It is a big mess.
Microsoft is doing its best with vendor-lockin. I have been using rich text documents with great success, as it is able to be opened by any OS or office suite. I know that it is limited in functionality, but at least it is open to all.
I use SSuite Office software. It is capable of creating very nice rich text documents, which anyone is able to open, no matter on what system or office suite they use.
Score: -3
|will the files saved in office 2010 be compatible with 2007? e.g. new animations and web video embedding in ppt will show up correctly? maybe an update to 2007 or compatibility pack as the one for 2003?
Score: 0
|Surely these features are worth the $200-500 upgrade price!!
Score: -3
|Surely.
Score: 0
|