Login:
Password:

UMPC: Why Microsoft Thinks You Need It

By Ed Oswald, BetaNews

March 17, 2006, 3:55 PM

Microsoft believes consumers are looking for an uncompromised level of computing on the go. Thus, it began the process of developing what is now called the Ultra-Mobile PC back in 2002. Heading that team is Otto Berkes, the device's architect and now general manager of the UMPC team.

In an interview with BetaNews, Berkes says the impetus behind the creation of this new type of computing device has to do with several changes in the industry. Today's desktops and laptops are not designed for true "on the go" use, he explained, but people are increasingly going mobile.

The UMPC opens up a wider array of computing scenarios, including easier in-car use, or walking down a hall between meetings. The device does not take away from the PC experience, because it is running a full version of Windows, Berkes added. "It looks like something you'd pick up with two hands."

Although it may appear to be, the UMPC is not intended to be a replacement for any other device.

"It's not the death of the laptop," Berkes argued. He said laptops were still great tools for what he called "destination end-points." While in transit, it would be easier to use the UMPC, while upon arriving at a destination, the laptop would still likely be the better tool.

The same goes for Microsoft's Tablet PC concept. "Tablets will stay on the market," Berkes assured. "We are using Tablet PC technology, but delivering it in a different way." This new implementation would come in the form of the Microsoft Touch Pack, a set of applications and services intended to take advantage of UMPC's touch screen and feature set.

Berkes also took issue with criticisms that the device is too big, or a rehash of prior form factors like the PepperPad and OQO, which have both failed to find a market.

Very few devices are actually appropriate for the pocket, he said, and the fact that the UMPC is a fully functional Windows PC with capabilities to connect to a multitude of devices just like a regular PC sets it apart from the crowd.

Another difference from even Microsoft's own failures -- such as Windows Smart Displays -- is the fact that it's a PC at heart. "The family tree is still the PC. It will be able to feed off of the huge Windows ecosystem," Berkes explained. Thus, he said, the product provides a huge amount of value over other devices.

To ensure the impression of value, Microsoft played a large part in the design of the UMPC hardware platform. By providing prototypes and reference designs, as well as offering guidance in manufacturing, the company hopes to avoid problems.

"With the UMPC being more device-like, the software and hardware need to be coordinated," Berkes said, indicating that Microsoft has learned from the mistakes of its hands-off approach in digital media devices.

Many analysts have said that Microsoft allowed too much leeway among its partners in designing those devices, which resulted in issues with its PlaysForSure technology and compatibility with Windows Media Player. Apple's iPod in the meantime secured its dominance through a unified platform.

Microsoft will not rule over designs with an iron fist; the company will only mandate some functions and leave the rest up to the manufacturer. This includes the options for a keyboard, rather than the DialKeys thumb input method that is included in the UMPC Touch Pack software.

The same hands-off approach would cover peripherals, with Berkes saying the company expects "OEMs to provide their own peripheral solutions," as their accessories "would be designed best for a particular model." He would not rule out, however, accessories being produced by Microsoft.

Current generation UMPCs are not perfect, Berkes conceded, especially in the area of battery life. The devices are expected to only operate for three to four hours on a battery charge, which is slightly below the average of today's laptop. He said this has become a focus of future devices based on the platform.

"The industry recognizes the physical limitations of battery life with today's PC architecture," Berkes said. Efforts are underway to remedy the issue, he added, mentioning Intel's recent announcements that it was investing heavily in manufacturing more efficient processors. "This translates directly into better battery life."

Another area of concern among consumers is price, which in the current models ranges from $599 to $999 USD. Berkes said the market would largely determine the pricing, and as more of the devices are sold, the cost of manufacturing and purchasing would fall. "My personal hope is that [the UMPC] becomes so affordable that anyone who wants one would be able to purchase one," he said.

Berkes also touched on the topic of a Windows Vista upgrade path. The first Ultra-Mobile PCs will ship with Windows XP, as the launch comes six to eight months away from the expected release of Microsoft's next-generation operating system.

Berkes said that the UMPC would be part of a "Vista Ready" program that Microsoft plans to roll out shortly. The program, much like ones the company has employed previously, would aim to assure consumers that the hardware they are purchasing is ready to run the next Windows release.

"We are, and have been, testing Vista in our labs to ensure there is a smooth upgrade path," he assured.

Even in its short life, the device has already assembled a litany of critiques from the industry. On Tuesday, research firm Gartner released a report calling the device a "tweener," and said that low battery life, high price and a non-Vista operating system will probably doom the product early on.

"For these reasons, we question the timing of this launch: Why rush this to market before it is ready to succeed?" Gartner analysts asked in the report. "Despite the promise of this device category, the UMPC as currently conceived will fail to achieve mainstream success."

According to Gartner, the device needs to meet several requirements in order to become successful, including an eight-hour battery and sub-$400 price, compelling content bundles, better shell running on top of Vista, better text entry, and "dock-and-go" syncing.

But Berkes remains confident that users will find the UMPC a good fit with their increasingly mobile lifestyles. "It's a very different device than what's available today."

Add a Comment (48 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By PC Rat

posted Mar 23, 2006 - 11:47 AM

...

"explain why you need it"

...

The PC Rat rests his case that nobody wants UMPC !
...

The Computer Rodent

...

Score: 0

By Reap_r

posted Mar 21, 2006 - 10:53 AM

It is a bit frustrating to see the clearly inferior products gain overwhelming market share. This happens with microsoft a lot. They spend a great deal on marketing, but most of all they have a chokehold on the OEM relationships and they always have. This is how we have their os beating OS/2. This is how DR Dos was killed when it was the superior product (through FUD and deals with Intel). This is what happened to BETA. It was the manufacturers and the companies themselves that peformed the necessary deals to push the inferior technology out.

The customer by and large was too ingorant or apathetic to really understand what their buying choices were doing. The same thing is happening slowly with DRM. As people accept this and purchase DRM infected product, they seal the doom of the open ones. They don't understand that by taking the easy path offered by these companies and not getting informed, they reduce the choices available to them. That is why your choices for hardware/software platforms are limited. That is why there are many superior products that do not exist any longer.

The companies that think/act like sharks and ink backroom deals with their distribution channels to squeeze out their competition are the ones that become the 800lb gorilla. How else could AOL offer such a lousy product at a high price and succeed. They got "bundled", they spent massive amounts of money on sending out all those cds (instead of upgrading their network and support). They killed off many hometown ISPs that offered more for less by partering with the OEMs.

I am not making a good/evil judgement here, but I do reject the argument that companies like microsoft are successful solely because they offered a superior product or that they were more innovative. The main innovation that they showed was how to use leverage.

Score: 0

By Silentmaster101

posted Mar 21, 2006 - 11:28 AM

they had to at least have something superior sometime when they didnt have leverage. but i do argee they spend more time marketing some things then they do developing them, like their bluetooth desktop, and windows me.

Score: 0

By bostonma

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 6:11 PM

Why people refer to MS as M$:

People use MS because that's what's available. [Largly MS's fault by keeping/pushing competitors off the market.} You're forced into one product and then it's unstable or doesn't work properly -- very frustrating!

Score: 0

By Black-Wolf

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 12:42 PM

Uncompromised on the Go meaning
Get a gaming notebook.

Screw Microsoft. :P

Score: 0

By flibbertigibbet

edited Mar 18, 2006 - 8:29 AM

Ok.. screw the content bundles! Go with the high end battery life! and sure less than $400 is great but not nescesary! $599+ is awesome idea. I'm saving already! I know what I want from my umpc, and anyone who doesnt see the umpc as what I want, is stupid and doesnt know what a ultramobile computer can do for them! That and they are stuck with "Oh IPODS are cool!"
Here's what I want from my UMPC... and I'm aparently the "target audience"(thanks Terri Stratton)... Short list ;-)

First I see my Mp3 player... and my personal video player... my nifty wifi
web browser... my remote controll for any computer on my wireless network
that'll do what I want (preferably running linux)... with skype, my free
wifi phone (ahhh.. so cool)... my personal navigator (if it's got gps, if
not hook a gps up to it).... my mini sketchbook (with alias sketchbook pro,
my tablet would be my big sketchbook)... my personal day-minder... my xp psp
(haha... not that I play much games, but i'm sure some would be neat to play
on the umpc)... my shopping assistant... my mobile picture frame... my
bartending guide... Need I go on??? :-D

YEah! for those nay sayers of umpc's... why hate new technology, smaller computers, change in general, when you can embrace it! Pay your dues, and get something neat!
Of course it's not going to be the best computer on the market... it's not going to play awesome games that only a desktop can play! It's not going to be everything for everyone. But it is what I want, and many others too!

Score: 0

By varis

edited Mar 22, 2006 - 7:01 AM

Essentially you can do all that with the Nokia 770. For a fraction of the price, size, weight... On top of that it runs Linux (free, secure, etc...).

There is lots of competition that is ahead of UMPC - just check out my blog at http://icct.blogspot.com/ . I'm not saying the UMPC does not have a future - it has some faults and is overhyped, but if more credible vendors/tech like Via and Linux comes to the platform, it could grow to be fairly interesting.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 10:32 AM

I don't think it's necessary to claim that anyone who doesn't agree is automatically an idiot... different strokes, and all that jazz... to each their own. An idiot can be more or less defined as ranting and raving about something meaningless and incoherent.

Anyway, I do like the point you make about embrace new technology-- but each person is going to use the tech that makes sense for their lives, not just what YOU feel is the best. :)

Score: 0

By ds0934

edited Mar 18, 2006 - 12:54 PM

Everyone forgot the Beverly Hillbillies episode when Jethro installed the car phone, attached to the giant spool of cable out front of the house. Wired is the future folks. C'mon. Get with it. Wireless is so old fashioned.

How about if they make a Community Home edition of UMPC, that would be CHUMPC!

Score: 0

By Jim

posted Mar 18, 2006 - 8:09 AM

I completely agree with mjm01010101, back in high school I use to have this hudge laptop, a Compaq Armada 1500 I think, swapped out the floppy drive for a second LI battery and still it would die 1 or 2 classes before the end of the day (unless I avoided using it at lunch). Laptops, or something similar needs to have at least 8 hours of battery life doing more then just word and excel.

Score: 0

By Neoprimal

posted Mar 18, 2006 - 7:37 AM

When did we all become so completely dependent on batteries? Many seem to forget, the battery is used when we are 1. on the road and 2. wherever we just cannot find an outlet - which would be, on the road/in a plane. I don't think it's a bad idea. Thin, light laptops run in at 2-3 grand...that's 2 times the cost of my Athlon64 3400 (4gb ram, ATI X1600, 300gbx3 HD) setup rig. While I agree that with battery life, more obviously means better; come on....if it comes with something allowing me to plug it into my car or a nice tiny discrete A/C adapter, I have no issues with it.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 11:23 AM

Indeed!

Score: 0

By LPH

edited Mar 18, 2006 - 3:41 AM

Thank you for the article Ed. Do you think the scenario of someone walking down a hallway makes sense? Before leaving the office, would someone sync to the UMPC so the data goes with them - taking the data with them to a meeting, home, or on a trip? How does the consumer distinguish between a notebook and a UMPC? Why choose one over the other? Or does MS assume people will own all three? What do you think?

Layne
http://www.umpcbuzz.com

Score: 0

By Silentmaster101

posted Mar 21, 2006 - 11:34 AM

right all we need is some insurance company getting something even smaller that they can upload all of our ident info to...

http://www.theregister.c...5/ernstyoung_ibm_laptop/

wonderful idea bill...

Score: 0

By elroyjetson

edited Mar 18, 2006 - 2:56 PM

I believe that in order for the UMPC to be effective you need a few things to happen. First, wireless broadband must be ubiquitous. Cell phone companies like Verizon and Cingular are close to making this an affordable reality. Second, we need to get the data back in the network and out of the PC/iPod/wherever we put it. We don't need to carry it around we just need fast access to it. And Lastly, we need to retrain people to think in terms of 100% paperless.

These three things will be key to the success of the UMPC.

Elroy
http://www.elroyjetson.org

Score: 0

By sztosz

posted Mar 18, 2006 - 5:18 AM

Well as a corporate customer having a laptop in office & home UMPC is good thing. BUT ONLY IF, it will have "synchro on the fly" based for example on wi-fi. And at least it can be "pluged in" to Linux.

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 11:57 PM

battery life just plain sucks. I'm not even going to consider a device like this until it's 10+ hours. I need 8 hours for a workday/vacation, plus a cushion. I have laptops now with 1 hour max battery life and they sit useless because my company is sick of investing in new batteries every 2 years.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 11:22 AM

I generally agree, and I don't intend to buy the first generation of them... but providing they improve battery life in the 2nd generation, I'd consider one.

On the other hand, I do agree with a point someone else makes-- it's kinda ignorant to believe that batteries are the only practical way to use a laptop... sometimes just being able to conserve desk-space or sit on the bed or a couch with the laptop makes a heck of a lot of difference to people. :)

Score: 0

By JacenSolo

posted Mar 20, 2006 - 9:17 AM

My laptops always plugged in...

Sadly it only has a one hour battery life :(

Score: 0

By ds0934

edited Mar 18, 2006 - 12:50 PM

Recipe for chance of success:

Blackberry 7290 form-factor
*slightly* larger color screen
Add solid-state storage (1-2 GB min)
Add MP3/WMV/OGG play and playlist
Add scalable web browser
Add GPS mapping and directions
8-10 hrs battery life
Sell for less than $600 USD
Done

Score: 0

By fewt

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 1:11 PM

My Pocket PC has almost all of these today. (just not the GPS)

Score: 0

By ds0934

posted Mar 20, 2006 - 2:58 PM

I forgot to include movie viewing. Does your PPC do that also? If so, what make/model is it?

Score: 0

By fewt

posted Mar 20, 2006 - 3:57 PM

Yep.

HP IPaq rx3115

It has Nevo (www.mynevo.com) which includes (in addition to the remote control & media client) software that you run on a computer in your house and it provides media services to your IPaq.

http://h18000.www1.hp.co.../12059_na/12059_na.HTML

Score: 0

By PC Rat

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 8:55 PM

...

If Apple created this, it's be called "Bear" or "Lion" or "iTablet" or something.

But, Microsoft came up with the catchy name of "UMPC" !

There's no grass-roots demand for this device. Microsoft will have to invent 'consumer demand'.

Another ingenious solution to a non-existent problem !
...

The Computer Rodent

...

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 10:36 AM

I've said it once, I'm saying it again... just because YOU don't see a need or demand for it, doesn't mean the demand doesn't exist.

It's all about marketing and customer preference. There will be people who want bigger than PDA but not laptop-ish.

Score: 0

By PC Rat

edited Mar 19, 2006 - 3:08 PM

...

"just because YOU don't see a need or demand for it, doesn't mean the demand doesn't exist"

...

Silly boy.

In a couple years ~nobody~ will remember what UMPC even stands for !

There's ZERO consumer demand for a giant-Pocket-PC.

Especially at notebook PC prices !
...

The Computer Rodent

...

Score: 0

By JacenSolo

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 8:36 PM

I can;t even remember NOW :P

Score: 0

By ds0934

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 9:30 PM

OMG - so true

Score: 0

By siryak

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 8:39 PM

Seems interesting but it is going to need a simple text input without being to bulky....

Score: 0

By purefx

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 8:07 PM

I'm sure this will succeed just as microsoft's push for tablets did! hahaha

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 10:37 AM

You know, last September there were reports of the TabletPC's failing miserably. In October, I started looking at them, and now everywhere I go I hear people buzzing about them and how "cool" they are and functional. Especially when I demo mine to friends, family, and coworkers. I know at least a dozen people who are looking to buy one this summer.

Score: 0

By Floodland

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 7:30 PM

Mhhh.. It seems like the correct answer is: Because Micro$oft wants to sell.
Maybe M$ will promise the UMPC box will come with 16 hours battery life and a girl inside for your pleasure, but should we believe? I hope so... Time will tell.. Too much blah blah for me.

Score: 0

By Upsilon

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 11:25 PM

I believe the battery life is like 2 hours and a half. Come on...

Score: 0

By 11001001

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 8:02 PM

Please, as with all mature intellectual discussions, let's try to refrain from referring to Microsoft as "Micro$oft" or "M$" because once that starts happening, the overall IQ of the comments plummets.

Score: 0

By PC Rat

edited Mar 17, 2006 - 9:02 PM

...

The use of "M$" is a term the anti-Microsoft Taliban use to indicate their disgust that Microsoft is a corporation rather than a non-profit charity dedicated to world peace and eradicating social inequities.

They get this silly world-view from their socialist college professors.

In a few years from now they'll grow up, and dispense with these kinds of naive ideologies.
...

The Computer Rodent

...

Score: 0

By filtr

edited Mar 17, 2006 - 10:01 PM

PC Rat,

It has nothing to do with them being a corporation. It has to do with their products sucking since... ever. They BOUGHT dos from some poor schmuck in seattle in like 1981 or whatever, and then lived off it's inferiority (compared to other available solutions like cp/m) all the way until 1999! Their products have always been mediocre at best and yet they are the king of the hill! It's just kind of frustrating.

The people who put M$ and such in their posts just dont want to get into long explanations of why microsoft sucks so hard so they just voice their disapproval simply by misspelling the name. It's like waving a flag, "I'm one of you! I'm one of you! I hate microsofts crappy OS too!", that's all.

Here's a way to think about it. If you were a video enthusiast back when VHS won out over BETA (the far superior platform) wouldn't you be pretty perturbed? How about when Intel x86 family won out of the much nicer (and unfortunately more expensive) 68xxx family? IDE prevalent over SCSI for consumer use? 'upgraded' USB2 instead of 'scalable' IEEE1394? There's tons of examples of when the inferior product came out on top for one reason or another (marketing, price, etc)...

These people who say M$ are just voicing their opinion passively by changing one character, perhaps YOUR socialist college professor gave YOU the silly world-view and for some reason you now think you know exactly why these 'silly' people say what they say without the slightest idea...

Score: 0

By moejun

edited Mar 18, 2006 - 9:26 PM

It has nothing to do with them being a corporation. It has to do with their products sucking since... ever. They BOUGHT dos from some poor schmuck in seattle in like 1981 or whatever, and then lived off it's inferiority (compared to other available solutions like cp/m) all the way until 1999! Their products have always been mediocre at best and yet they are the king of the hill! It's just kind of frustrating.

- Just want to ask dude, what OS are you using right now? If it's Microsoft's then what the hell are you complaining about? All those people who say Microsoft sucks can just look at the figures and you'll realize that no matter what anyone says Microsoft has the worldwide pc market in the palm of its hands. Oh, yeah, that may change in a million years but for now, just what do you want to prove? Microsoft is an inferior product? Then how come almost everyone uses it? Why continue to use a product that sucks? I'm no MS fanboy by the way but I'm just amused by your reasoning filtr. really amused

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 10:55 AM

Here's a little bit of ECON-101 for you, since I believe in facts rather than assumptions...

When products suck and/or when products are over-priced... competitors swoop in and offer comparable or better products through a concept called marketing.

Then, customers hear about these competing products and make a decision of which one is truly better for them and their needs. Then they buy what they want based on the better overall deal (price, form, and function-- most commonly).

The company with the weaker product goes back to the drawing board and "reinvents" their product by improving it and making it better... then the process repeats itself.

As the process continues, inevitably one product takes dominance because of superior marketing of those three factors-- price, form, and function. From that point, demand for a product increases, and therefore so does price. They're making more, so it costs more for production costs (that includes increased personnel and labor), plus the idea in capitalism is to sell more and make a profit.

Anyway, that entire process has NOT been broken in the computing industry except when companies with an inability to market a lousy product file law suits against companies. Take RealPlayer for example. It was a great product at first and I remember using it a lot. But then they tarnished their own image by turning it into a lousy, spying product. At that point plenty of other players-- including Microsoft-- offered better, and the market hasn't looked back since. Until RealPlayer changes their image, no one will care. They're like the bully beating up the nerd for being smarter, and forcing them to do their homework.

No one thought anyone would ever succeed in challenging IBM back in the day... but Microsoft changed that by breaking away for Windows, and that helped all the Compaqs and Dells etc etc.

Microsoft's products, for all their faults, succeed in marketing price, form, and function more often than not. That's why people use them. It's what people are familiar with, and are comfortable with. Those who are not comfortable find alternatives and usually whine about everyone should just follow them, even though it may not be right for those people.

To each their own! Use a product that makes you comfortable. Marketing isn't bashing the other product, it's advertising your own as better.

Score: 0

By arbigast

edited Mar 22, 2006 - 2:06 PM

I whole-heartedly agree. Linux/Mac OS is great, and serves the function it was designed for. But there is a HUGE market of people out there that want EASE of USE and not to have to learn or re-learn the basics just to get a word document or spreadsheet done, or to send an email. I'm not saying Macs aren't easy to use, but as far as networking is concerned... MS has 'em beat hands down, along with scalability, interoperability and network security. Yeah MS is bigger than anyone else out there, for a reason: They market a product that can take you to the deepest levels of networking and performance, AND is so easy to use your grandmother can take one out of the box and be on the internet in a matter of minutes. The only "true" evil company out there is AOL, which is why their symbol is virtually indistinguishable from the illuminati's all-seeing-eye. EDUCATION, EXPLORATION, EVOLUTION.

Score: 0

By bostonma

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 6:09 PM

"Microsoft's products, for all their faults, succeed in marketing price, form, and function more often than not. That's why people use them. It's what people are familiar with, and are comfortable with."
Not sure you're right.
People use MS because that's what's available. [Largly MS's fault by keeping/pushing competitors off the market.} You're forced into one product and then it's unstable or doesn't work properly -- very frustrating!

Score: 0

By Silentmaster101

posted Mar 21, 2006 - 11:44 AM

what i would like to know is how every article the least bit related to microsoft ends up as a big microsoft bashing? dont you people have better things to do? like try and make your little versions of linux do everything windows can do out of the box or something?

Score: 0

By TomA102210

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 7:20 PM

"Microsoft's products, for all their faults, succeed in marketing price, form, and function more often than not. That's why people use them. It's what people are familiar with, and are comfortable with."
Not sure you're right.
People use MS because that's what's available. [Largly MS's fault by keeping/pushing competitors off the market.} You're forced into one product and then it's unstable or doesn't work properly -- very frustrating!
-----------------------------------------------
Although Gates is the son of a prominent Seattle area attorney, he did literally start out in his dads garage in Seattle. Gages is smart, aggressive and successful; something that any startup could eventually be just as Gates is today.

Score: 0

By moejun

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 7:17 PM

microsoft's fault? does it force people to buy it's products? does it point a gun to their heads? would you use a product that's availabe to the majority or one that is available only to the uppercrust? wonderful reasoning guys!

Score: 0

By Floodland

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 10:50 PM

To end this thread. I'm a mature man who use multiple plataforms from a long time (C64, later D.O.S., OS/2, Deskview, win9x, Mac OS 5-X, some linux, some Netware and finally NT and their sons)
There is one thing about Micro$oft I still don't understand besides marketing and lawers: How M$ release a clearly inferior product and win the market to another already installed (and usually better) product.
Windows is one example: OS/2 was *way* better than Microsoft 3.0, but windows won.
More recent: Microsoft Me$$enger is a pathetic product, much worse than the original ICQ (later Miriabilis fall in AOL hands and that's another story). But ICQ had +-100M users when Microsoft made a soso-usable product that still today cannot send messages offline (miriabilis offered that service from icq 97, I think). But M$ win, time after time. The question is HOW they do it!?

Score: 0

By moejun

posted Mar 19, 2006 - 11:14 PM

good point, been wondering the same thing for a long time now...

Score: 0

By ukexpat

posted Mar 21, 2006 - 10:29 PM

How? Because your average Joe Sixpack buying his first computer is going to use whatever is on the PC - he is not going to download any of the other, allegedley better, applications, either because they don't know about them or don't care, or both...

Score: 0

By Das mod

posted Mar 17, 2006 - 5:16 PM

sub-$400 price,...

OH YEAH !!!

Score: 0

By madx

posted Mar 18, 2006 - 9:14 PM

It would be great as a hand held device like the PSP, otherwise I think it is useless.

Score: 0