Where America stands in broadband, according to the FCC

By Tim Conneally | Published September 29, 2009, 1:21 PM

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, better known as the "broadband stimulus plan," included the proviso that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) submit a National Broadband Plan to Congress by February 2010.

With just under five months left before the plan is due before Congress, the FCC today used the results of its 26 broadband-related workshops and hearings and nearly 41,000 pages of comments to describe the current state of broadband and enable Commissioner/public feedback for review.

"We still have a lot of work to do. But with all of the data we've gathered in our workshops and hearings, in the record, and in our own research, we think we have a pretty good handle on the status of broadband in the US," said Blair Levin, Executive Director of the Omnibus Broadband Initiative.

FCC's facts about US connectivity today:

  • Actual broadband speeds lag advertised speeds by at least 50%*
  • Speeds slower than 768 Kbps do not qualify as "basic broadband"
  • Between 3-6 million Americans are unserved by basic broadband
  • 4% of Americans have no broadband access at all due to geography
  • 33% of Americans have access to broadband, but have not adopted
  • 66% of Americans have adopted broadband at home
  • More than 70% of high school students use the Internet as primary homework research tool
  • There are no broadband connection services specifically for public safety, they have been limited to commercial services
  • People with disabilities use the Internet half as much as people without
  • Only 29% of lower income users have made purchases online, compared to 82% of upper income users
  • More than 77% of Fortune 500 companies posted jobs and accepted applications online only in 2005, and that number has only increased

According to the Commission's preliminary estimates, it will cost more than $20 billion to provide "universal availability" at speeds between 768 Kbps and 3 Mbps, and for 100 Mbps and above, it could cost more than $350 billion. Ensuring that all areas have either multiple carriers or multiple methods of connection to prevent local monopolies will make the cost "significantly higher." Part of this includes assessing the wireless spectrum to accommodate future mobile broadband consumption.

The FCC has a four hour long open meeting occurring today (being liveblogged, Twittered [@FCC], and broadcast live online) devoted entirely to the Broadband Plan, in which the public is highly encouraged to participate. The facts listed above are only some of the major points the commission will be making today.

"We...want the public to weigh on the facts and analysis we will present so we can make adjustments now, while we are still at a relatively early point in the process, rather than later, after decisions have been made," Levin continued.

*Originally the FCC said it was between 50%-80%, but later retracted the statement, saying: "This sentence is incorrect: our data does not support the 80% figure."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Just like Healthcare, the US pays more for less with broadband. the only real solution to it that i can see is to treat broadband like a utility. Have the states setup non-profit monopolies to run a fiber network to every home and business. Said non-profit would then lease said lines to anyone willing to pay. SO Comcast, Time Warner, Verizon, AT&T, Mom and Pop #1, Mom and Pop #2...Mom and Pop #n, etc... could all provide services over said infrastructure. All revenues from leasing the lines would go towards maintaining and enhancing the network.

Granted, in the corrupt US political system, this would fail as people continue to vote in corrupt Republicans and Democrats who would take money from the broadband revenues to pay for their pet projects which benefit their friends.

Score: 1

|

I say if it costs 350 billion to get 100mbit everywhere, DO IT, and DO IT QUICKLY.

Score: 1

|

4% of Americans have no broadband access at all due to geography
(This 4% seems to be a low number, I know huge low density population areas that do not have access in FL, WV, and VA. The areas I know can't be the only places without service, I thik 4% low.

33% of Americans have access to broadband, but have not adopted
66% of Americans have adopted broadband at home

103% of the population is the population of America. I always wondered if 3% were hiding somewhere, now we found them. Thats GOVT math.

Thats a HUGE jump from 3 to 100 Mbps. Even 10-15 Mbps would be fantastic, since upload speeds will still be a trickle, it's not realistic or needed to have 100Mbps u/d to every home is it?

Score: 0

|

33% of Americans have access to broadband, but have not adopted
66% of Americans have adopted broadband at home

Strange numbers. I believe those are two different statistics, though. 67% of Americans have access to and have adopted broadband, while 66% of those Americans have adopted broadband at home, leaving the rest to businesses and such. That's my guess anyway.

Score: 0

|

I think, personally, they're probably talking about places that are not able to get even TELEPHONE access to due to things such as frequent landslides, unstable land, etc. There *are* still a small percentage of people that don't have or use electricity, telephone, etc. ... some of these people don't b/c they can't, some b/c they refuse to have these utilities.

Score: 0

|

"Ensuring that all areas have either multiple carriers or multiple methods of connection to prevent local monopolies will make the cost "significantly higher.""

If I didn't know any better, I would think the FCC is trying to protect the monopolies. It would be interesting to know their rationale behind this quote.

Score: 0

|

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.

PDC 2009: Microsoft cares about Web browser performance

The effort to give users of the world's dominant Web browser the impression of quality, is a personal one for the man who leads that battle.

Nokia re-affirms its commitment to Symbian, sort of

Maemo won't necessarily be replacing Symbian in the Nokia N-Series, but that's definitely a place where it will be found.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

AOL's spinoff from Time Warner to shed 2,500 jobs

As AOL moves toward become an independent company again, it will cut nearly a third of its workforce.

Gartner: SMS-based money transfer will be bigger than mobile browsing, search

Gartner issues its predictions for the 10 things our phones will be doing in 2012.

Don't forget to upgrade to Firefox 3.6 beta 3 today

Mozilla has released the latest beta its Firefox 3.6 browser software, just over one week after beta 2.