Login:
Password:

Yahoo Senior Counsel to Be Grilled by Congress Over China Disclosure

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

October 17, 2007, 12:24 PM

Stepping up his rhetoric against Yahoo yesterday, the chairman of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Tom Lantos (D - Calif.), said he has issued requests for CEO Jerry Yang and senior vice president and general counsel Michael Callahan, to appear before the committee on November 6. Their purpose there will be to answer allegations and respond to evidence Rep. Lantos says he will present that Callahan made false statements to Congress in February 2006, regarding whether Yahoo turned over private customer data about a Chinese journalist to Chinese government authorities.

"Our committee has established that Yahoo provided false information to Congress in early 2006," reads a statement from Rep. Lantos last night. "We want to clarify how that happened, and to hold the company to account for its actions both before and after its testimony proved untrue. And we want to examine what steps the company has taken since then to protect the privacy rights of its users in China."

Specifically, the case involves Chinese journalist Shi Tao. Two years ago, as the independent Dui Hua Foundation learned, Chinese police requested private information on Tao from Yahoo. The Foundation managed to acquire copies of Yahoo's response, which included private communications and personal data (PDF available here). Tao was tried for charges of taking notes in a meeting where he was not authorized to take notes, and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, for what a committee member calls "trumped up charges."

"We have now learned there is much more to the story than Yahoo let on," stated Rep. Christopher Smith (R - N.J.), "and a Chinese government document that Yahoo had in their possession at the time of the hearing left little doubt of the government's intentions. US companies must hold the line and not work hand in glove with the secret police." In February 2006, Smith served as the chairman of the subcommittee at whose meeing Callahan allegedly gave false testimony.

In a statement to BetaNews this afternoon, Yahoo's global director of public affairs, Tracy Schmaler, called Lantos' and Smith's accusation "grossly unfair and mischaracterizes the nature and intent of our past testimony."

Schmaler goes on to assert her company's opinion that the Foreign Affairs Committee as a whole actually believes Yahoo was being truthful, and that these two members' contentions - although they're high-ranking members - "revolves around a genuine disagreement with the Committee over the information provided.

"We had hoped that we could work with the Committee to have an open and constructive dialogue about the complicated nature of doing business in China," Schmaler told BetaNews this afternoon. "All businesses interacting with China face difficult questions of how to best balance the democratizing forces of open commerce and free expression with the very real challenges of operating in countries that restrict access to information. This challenge is particularly acute for technology and communication companies such as Yahoo."

She added that Yahoo is in participation with other companies to develop a global code of conduct for US firms engaging in business and other interactions with foreign countries, including China, and that the US Dept. of State is involved in this process.

She then went on to suggest that the November 6 hearing should involve all of these "stakeholders" in international business, not just Yahoo. "It is our hope that the Committee will approach the hearing in that same constructive spirit," she told BetaNews.

Lantos' statement yesterday stopped short of suggesting that a subpoena should be issued, and also omitted any use of the word "contempt" - or, for that matter, "charges." While Schmaler's response indicated that Yahoo will participate in next month's hearings, it also appears to try to stave off Lantos elevating the subject to the next level: criminal proceedings.

Add a Comment (23 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By Robert C.

edited Oct 18, 2007 - 2:57 PM

Tom Lantos is not always right; but he is a national treasure. Cutting through to the heart of the hypocrisy, outright lies and distortions put up as a smokescreen by arrogant guilty rights-abusing government and private types in this country, he names precisely what is being done that is wrong. Then he tries to do something about the wrong. Too bad that he's almost the only fearless and intellectually honest man in our Congress. It was once said of El Cid, a thousand years ago, "What a noble man...too bad he had not a noble king!...". It's true of Representative Lantos, I suggest, as well as that other defender of those being sold out by a bad 'monarch'--and Lantos has one of those to contend with as well.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 22, 2007 - 9:31 AM

Lantos is a toad. He has no spine and zero values. He takes on the image and values of what he thinks will get him the most votes/funding at any particular time.

Score: 0

By imafurby

posted Oct 18, 2007 - 3:01 PM

What a load...

Score: 0

By DatabaseBen

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 5:24 PM

Global Code of Conduct. Sounds interesting but the rules of "the game" are always changing.

What Yahoo should do is to provide a tool for journalist in communist countries that would conceal or scramble their identity and location.

Then when communists demand the data on their outlaw journalist, the scrambled data will be useless to them.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Oct 17, 2007 - 9:47 PM

Global Code of Conduct. Sounds interesting

It does indeed.

The only obvious problem being that the globe is not united. Such a thing would only work if that were the case. As it stands, it would only add one more item to the list of complaints against those who we know wouldn't follow it anyway. In essence, useless.

Score: 0

By DatabaseBen

edited Oct 18, 2007 - 9:37 AM

Yeh, i wonder where this perverted ideology of global rules are seeping from.

The geneva convention are such a set of global rules. However, it was obvious that America had / has a difficult time abiding them. And it is certain that the rules will never apply to the cia or the kgb or red china, et al.

However, it would be in the best interest of the world that we provide the tools to protect the freedom of the press where there is none, even if it means breaking the rules covertly.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 22, 2007 - 9:28 AM

However, it would be in the best interest of the world that we provide the tools to protect the freedom of the press where there is none, even if it means breaking the rules covertly.

...by your standards. China, for instance, has vastly differing standards. Freedom of the press is not an inalienable or God-Given right. We have it in America, and other nations have it as well, it stems from our beliefs and culture. The beliefs and culture in China are not ours.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 4:34 PM

Why not, it's not like Congress has anything better to do than censure a country for something they did 100 years ago and vilify Talk Radio.

Score: 0

By dvferret

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 10:29 PM

lol, wow that was funny, yet SAD.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 9:45 PM

*laughs*

OK. I'll admit that was clever. Childish, but clever.

I can't believe they haven't banned your IP range yet.

Score: 0

By Avion Airplane

posted Oct 18, 2007 - 8:29 AM

people like you ruin a good thing...........

Score: 0

By Latz !

edited Oct 18, 2007 - 7:04 AM

Serious question, why does Betanews allow this?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 20, 2007 - 12:24 PM

i'm sure they don't want to be seen as limiting "free speech"...

However childish...

Score: 0

By imafurby

edited Oct 17, 2007 - 4:00 PM

Haven't these people (ie Lantos) better things to do? This is just turning into a big, messy waste of time. What is the point of all this, unless we're going to invade China and make them change their laws? I guess no one has ever provided false information to Congress have they? "I did not have sexual relations...etc"

although reading the comments here, it seems people are more concerned with spelling mistakes and html errors in the story!

Score: 0

By kashin

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 2:24 PM

Please start using spell check and read your own article over a couple of times before posting it. I spotted at least one spelling error and an unclosed set of quotation marks in this article. I see this too often on BetaNews and it makes the whole site look unprofessional.

Score: 0

By SMFulton3

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 3:21 PM

About unclosed sets of quotation marks: A paragraph containing a quote or citation that continues in the following paragraph from the same source, is not closed. See paragraphs 6 and 7 above for an example.

Not that a spelling error doesn't happen around here (it has), but after 23 years of this, I have found it difficult to give up some old rules.

-SF "Dang Those Pesky, Unprofessional Unclosed Quotes 3

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 3:48 PM

The first bit is a quotation of their views, the second is explanation (or expansion) of that view. I believe, in those instances, the quotes should be closed. It's only when a single speech requires a paragraph break that another set of quotes is not needed, correct?

Not that I think it should be a big deal. It's the HTML errors that generaly bug the snot out of me. I've been remarkably clear-headed lately. ;)

Score: 0

By rsx508

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 2:07 PM

Grilled? Are they fans of grilling in China?

Score: 0

By khetos

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 1:12 PM

you mean that theres not already laws stating what type of information should be assed on to who, or who has say over this type of issue?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 1:13 PM

*ahem*

assed?

Oops....

Score: 0

By SMFulton3

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 3:24 PM

Dang those pesky spelling errors. They make the whole dad gum site look like we're not making a livin' at this or somethin'.

-Jethro

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 3:43 PM

you mean they actually *pay* you guys???

:p

//couldn't resist

Score: 0

By dvferret

posted Oct 17, 2007 - 10:42 PM

OO dang, lol.

Nice. :P

Score: 0