Login:
Password:

iPhone and the Death of the Mobile Web

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

July 6, 2007, 3:34 PM

PERSPECTIVE Regardless of whether or not you bought into the flash and hype that accompanied the iPhone's launch, Apple's newest device is important not for what features it brings, but for what it makes obsolete. The death knell has been rung for the mobile Web.

Since the late 1990s when cell phones began doing more than just making calls and sending text messages, the concept of easily browsing the Web while on the go has loomed large. But despite the efforts of numerous companies and support from the W3C Web standards body, the effort has largely failed.

The idea of a mobile Web was straight forward: create versions of Web sites that are compatible with the limited capabilities and small screens of cell phones. Best practices were established for sites to follow, and a "mobileOK" label was pushed by the W3C.

"The Mobile Web Initiative's goal is to make browsing the Web from mobile devices a reality", said Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director and inventor of the Web. "W3C and mobile industry leaders are working together to improve Web content production and access for mobile users and the greater Web."

A new domain name was even established for the mobile Web: .mobi. In order to obtain a .mobi domain, a company had to follow a set of rules to ensure the domain would be compatible. The registrar offered tools such as a site builder and analyzer to aid the effort, and touted a large number of registrations shortly after the domain went live.

13 industry players backed the initiative, including Ericsson, Google, Microsoft, Nokia, Samsung, T-Mobile, and Vodafone among others.

The emergence of new Web standards such as XHTML and more advanced CSS were also supposed to help the effort. The technologies separated content from the markup that defined how it would be displayed, enabling mobile browsers to reformat Web pages for the small screen.

Except for large companies like Yahoo, Google and AOL, however, few Web sites offer secondary pages for the mobile Web. The issue is a catch 22: companies don't want to devote their resources to building something few people will use, and nobody will bother browsing the Web on a phone when so few sites can be viewed properly.

Accessing the Web on most mobile phones is an unreliable, and frequently painful, experience. Regardless of the costs involved -- 3G data service can run wireless subscribers $50 per month or more, while slower data plans cost $20 per month -- it's just not pleasant.

Pocket IE, a staple of Microsoft's Windows Mobile platform is largely useless for loading anything but pages specially designed for mobile browsers. Opera Mini arguably does a better job, but requires Java and does not work on many popular phones such as the Samsung Blackjack. The Palm OS browser is a relic at this point.

This is what makes the iPhone's debut especially important, because an answer has finally been found. And reviewers are heralding it as the first time the Web has been actually usable on a phone.

Apple's response to redesigning the Web for mobile devices? Don't. Instead of putting the requirement on developers of sites or creating a special subset of the Internet for the mobile Web, the iPhone simply makes the real, full Internet completely accessible for the first time on a small screen.

Specifically, Apple has included a version of its Safari browser in the iPhone. Users can load up full Web pages -- images and frames and all -- that can be zoomed in on by flicking two fingers on the screen. Specific page elements can be "clicked" with a finger, centering them and increasing their size for reading. The iPhone even opens multiple Web pages at once, similar to how tabs work in modern browsers.

The idea is not necessarily new. Microsoft is taking a similar approach with a technology preview it calls Deepfish. Deepfish is a mobile Web browser that lets a user view a portion of a Web page in a more normal view by providing a grey view port -- a kind of frame that slides over the full page view -- which can be zoomed in or repositioned with the joystick.

Microsoft has also expressed its disproval of the mobile Web initiative and .mobi, saying that the burden should be on software makers, not Web developers. But Deepfish hasn't gotten very far (it's still considered an experimental research project at Microsoft) and the program itself is quite buggy.

Apple, in the meantime, has proven that this solution is not only possible, but far more useful. And other software and hardware manufacturers are taking note. Nokia is reportedly licensing new touch screen technology, which could make its way into handsets as soon as next year. Microsoft surely won't sit back and let Apple retain the mobile browsing crown; expect an update to Pocket IE in the near future.

Even with a million units sold in the United States and European launches months away, the iPhone itself won't have enough reach to kill the idea of a separate, mobile-oriented Web. What Apple has done, however, is awoken other companies to what is possible when you go back to the drawing board and rethink an approach that just doesn't work.

Just as it redefined the music industry -- the way songs are sold and listened to on the go -- with the iPod, Apple has done the same with the Internet on the iPhone. Revolutionary? Maybe not, but personal computers existed before the Macintosh and operating systems before Windows 95. Sometimes, all you need is a little innovation to reach the tipping point that changes an industry forever.

Add a Comment (53 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By yzf888

posted Mar 23, 2008 - 10:15 PM

if you will convert video to iphone,i suggest http://www.yzf888.com/mv...le-video-converter.html.

Score: 0

By shashib

edited Oct 12, 2007 - 10:16 PM

While in theory devices will become more sophisticated and intelligently browse the internet. In todays world when i want to see a restaurant website all I need is a few kep pieces of information , so there is a need to the business to have a seperate mobile website where they have the phone number, diections right up front.

The iphone may not change this very much. I agree with mobidude as I have a T-Mobile Dash and i can browse what the iPhone can do .

Http://www.buildmymobi.com is a mobile website builder tool for small business

Score: 0

By xTwoStepx

edited Jul 13, 2007 - 11:25 PM

Whenever there is something apple based, all the PC users come attacking. What are you afraid of? The tech might have been around before but the iPhone has made it noticeable and therefore creates a large impact. I for one (a newly mac convert) would like an iPhone but refuse to because of its carrier. I would also prefer to wait for a v2 to come out since the current release isn't fully up to date with the tech available.

As far as the term out dated... It is not in reference to the companies supporting .mobi its the tech itself. And IMO it always sucked and is seriously a poor attempt at the web. Phones these days are being made cheaper and cheaper. Almost feel like a playschool toy in my hand. With the money they are saving on quality, maybe companies should spend more on their software developers.

My 2 cents... Don't bother flaming, I don't plan on looking to see if anyone replies.

Score: 0

By ziplock9000

edited Jul 12, 2007 - 10:31 AM

The iPhone is not the first devide of it's kind to do this. I have the Nokia N95 which was out before the iPhone, it loads 'normal' webpages and at 3.5G speeds.

Score: 0

By steve364

posted Jul 11, 2007 - 7:07 PM

"the first time the Web has been actually usable on a phone." Get real - I have been using Nokia Communicators for years. They have WAP capability but I have never bothered to use that because they can surf normal web pages with the built in browser. As a plus the communicator has a real keyboard and joystick device. I think that an i-phone is a step backwards - you should take the time to do a comparison between the Communicator & the iphone.

Score: 0

By MobiDude

posted Jul 11, 2007 - 1:44 PM

Drumcat, you say ".mobi and it's associates are dated and dying"?? So, what you're saying is Google, Nokia, Microsoft, Ericsson, Samsung, T-mobile, Vodafone....all of the companies behind dotMobi and the mobile Internet are "dated and dying"? That is a ridiculous statement. Ther are already over a half a mollion dotMobi domains registered, with several International brands launching mobile websites. The mobile Internet is here, it is real, and it is used much differently that the wired web. If you don't see that, maybe you should try taking your head out of the sand (or wherever it may be).

Score: 0

By drumcat

posted Jul 10, 2007 - 7:46 PM

Yes and no. Yes .mobi and its associates are dated and dying. No, iPhones aren't doing it. It may help, but the concept of mobile sites has been and always will be a red-headed stepchild.

If iPhone is what turns the tide, so be it. But as someone else said below, a 2" screen is a 2" screen. Browser software needs to catch up. Phone companies need to get a clue. Content will NOT be provided in a lame format like .mobi is.

I'll take a good rss reader over a cutsie browser on small phones. On bigger ones, figure it out, telcos. Make those flipscreens read the web. That means not cheaping out on lo-res screens.

Score: 0

By HelgeFossmo

posted Jul 10, 2007 - 4:07 PM

I agree that Apple's cellphone implementation of Safari is cool but really the whole iPhone hype is pathetic.

It lacks 3G. It lacks a video camera.

And considering how hyped up it is, we will now see another generation of dumb consumers buying outdated technology.

Because of Apple ignoring modern requirements for the next generation of mobile applications to be possible, the consumers have been pushed back another few years from taking advantage of advanced mobile capabilities such as video links between cellphone and the internet.

If you claim that iPhone is one step forward then you dont know what you are talking about.

Score: 0

By incidentist

edited Jul 10, 2007 - 12:49 AM

It may reduce the need for site developers to write stripped-down versions of sites for smartphones, but it'll compensate by pressuring them to write iPhone-like versions of their sites. Many web apps are rushing to release versions of their sites that look like iPhone apps, so I don't see how the situation is improved.

Score: 0

By rsx508

posted Jul 9, 2007 - 4:39 PM

Man, the screen on the iPhone gets hard to read after your fingers get stickier surfing porn sites. If only they had a teflon coated screen.

Score: 0

By dpcafe

edited Jul 8, 2007 - 9:53 PM

The same web browsing interface has been implemeted on Nokia phones a year ago based on the same open source http://webkit.org/ that safari is built on. While it was cool in the beginning, it becomes tedious after a few weeks and you'd find the zoom-in zoom-out feature nothing but a compromise compared to PC-browsing.

Mobile Web is not about the browser, but the suitability of the content for that small screen, low battery, pay-per-surf device you carry around all the time. It's a new way of using the internet and I don't think it's even started yet...

Score: 0

By llahsram

edited Jul 9, 2007 - 2:05 PM

I had a Nokia E70 before getting an iPhone. Nokia's implementation of WebKit is *nothing* like the iPhone's. Yes, it's the same fundamental engine, but while Nokia's browser was barely functional, the iPhone really works.

Score: 0

By kompression

posted Jul 8, 2007 - 2:48 AM

Let me put it this way: a 2 inch screen will always be a 2 inch screen.

Score: 0

By MobiDude

edited Jul 8, 2007 - 12:35 AM

Wow. Keep on drinking the Kool-Aid. The mobile Internet is indeed alive and well, and in fact, growing like crazy. Not only is the mobile web different that the wired web, it provides functionality (one click dialing, for instance) that traditional web sites do not. Besides the fact that, at FULL SALES EXPECTATIONS, only 1% of all cell phone users will have an iPhone.

Personally, I don't think touch screens will catch on with the majority of users. I had one, and hated it. My T-Mobile Dash can do just about anything that the iPhone can do (many things better), and I would not trade it for one. Oh, and my Dash cost 1/3 the price.

Score: 0

By someToast

posted Jul 9, 2007 - 5:24 PM

"Not only is the mobile web different that the wired web, it provides functionality (one click dialing, for instance) that traditional web sites do not."

Safari on the iPhone parses out telephone numbers, so any "traditional" web site that lists a phone number supports one-click dialing on the iPhone.

Score: 0

By jbella

edited Jul 9, 2007 - 3:14 PM

To say that the Dash is 1/3 the price is not telling the whole truth.
The Dash with rebates costs $149.99
voice plans start at $39.99
Cheapest data plan is $29.99
Cheapest text messaging is $4.99
that comes to $74.97/month before taxes and fees.
Total 2 year cost is $1949.27

Total 2 year cost for an 8gb iPhone with the basic voice/data plan is $2038.76

The difference is $89.49 or $3.72/month
Hardly 1/3 the price.

Score: 0

By Morsel

posted Jul 8, 2007 - 2:30 AM

"Personally, I don't think touch screens will catch on with the majority of users. I had one, and hated it..." Well there's always a minority that doesn’t like touch-screen, I guess. Thankfully, the rest of us think it's brilliant. Have fun with your crappy T-Mobile Dash.

Score: 0

By NLight95

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 9:08 PM

Am I the only one who would rather just use a desktop or laptop PC to do my PC chores? Ask yourself, do you NEED a device like this? Like the iPod, I consider the iPhone a novelty. I'm a computer tech by trade and though I love to tinker and stay abreast of the latest technologies, I like to also find time to relax and get away from these type of devices that supposedly bring more convenience but end up increasing workload.

Score: 0

By netjustin

posted Jul 9, 2007 - 1:09 PM

I think it's fair to say that the more PC chores we are allowed to do on a mobile device, the better. For example, I had a client whose mail service went down while I was on vacation. I decided to try GotomyPC Pocket PC edition and I have to say I was impressed by the entire situation.

Not only did it work, but it rendered the remote screen quickly and visibly over EVDO. The touch screen was accurate and my PPC's slide-out keyboard was perfect for command prompt stuff.

Anyways, I agree that a full PC is usually not something that can be replaced but it's nice to have a competent substitute. =]

Score: 0

By Mystiqq

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 11:54 AM

As far as im concerned, "mobile web" never existed.

Score: 0

By 86proof

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 8:24 AM

I notice allot of you citing that Apple was not the first to offer this method of web browsing, and I find myself wanting to remind everyone that in the end, it won't matter who offered it first.

It will only matter who was the first to successfully gain consumer acceptance and use, resulting in a profitable and memorable implementation/delivery of concept to the consumer. Right now the heir apparent to that title is Apple - this however does not mean that another company such as Microsoft couldn't swoop in and take that title from Apple in the future.

Score: 0

By tnculp

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 9:54 AM

You're absolutely right, though the mac fan boys always make sure everyone knows when MS isn't the "first" on something.

Score: 0

By 86proof

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 3:48 PM

lol am not a mac fan boy but I agree that fans of any specific product or thing are quick to point out that they beat the nearest competition...even if the win ends up blurred by problems.

Score: 0

By Mystiqq

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 11:52 AM

I think Maddox said it best.

http://www.thebestpagein...e.net/c.cgi?u=macs_cant

Score: 0

By 86proof

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 3:53 PM

ok that site is funny - but honestly its just as extreme as the mac user sites poking fun at pc's - fortunately there are choices for everyone in the pc world, Windows, Linux, Apple OS - take your pic - if it works for you then it was worth whatever investment you put into it.

and again, I lol'd at that site - had me rolling :-)

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 12:48 AM

I saw someone with an iPhone today, and I must admit it does look slick. Only problem I am seeing it it's more like a mini portable video player than as a phone. Just my 2cents.

Score: 0

By bigsexy022870

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 11:51 PM

well with all the iphone does. it's basically a smaller version of a laptop with the ability to make phone calls. But keep in mind it does cost a small fortune. Almost the cost of a decent bargan laptop. I would be interested if it cost like 400 bucks. and if it worked with any provider. But one more thing i will never have i guess. Besides i really need a phone to make phone calls. not all this other crap. some of the mobile games are nice but alot are crap.

Score: 0

By BlackAle

edited Jul 6, 2007 - 11:39 PM

Personally I think having a large screen with a mobile is neither here or there. When you're out and about, you're most likely by using the web to provide particular information, like ...the quickest route to the next pub, or local taxi firms, etc... You don't want a huge web page.

The iPhone will probably just complicate things, as it displays whole web pages that you zoom in/out of.

IMHO as usual with apple it comes down to content over style, to most mobile users it's the content that matters.

The ideal future for me, would be for more web designers to embrace CSS so that content is seperate from presentation and that mobile devices have their own style sheet.

Score: 0

By kompression

edited Jul 8, 2007 - 3:23 PM

I totally agree. The studies so far prove your reinforce. The reason for mobility is immediate access to relevant information. Full page browsing on the iPhone is great and all but when I'm on business trips and need to access information, especially when I'm on a tight schedule and constantly moving, relevance of info is top priority over functionality. Especially considering that the iPhone works only on EDGE I'd take a 3G enabled BlackJack over the iPhone any day.

Score: 0

By Realist

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 10:57 AM

I don't see how the iPhone would "complicate" what you are proposing. It's by far the easiest way to accomplish getting "particular" information. It's obvious from your statement that you have not held one in your hands. It will take you all of about 5 minutes of playing with the device to decide, save for the Apple/ATT lock in limitations, it's the easiest functioning hand held device you've ever held. Mobile web is a joke in contrast.

Score: 0

By Sexbarril

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 4:16 PM

Perhaps if by device you mean multi-functions phone.

Otherwise there are by far many devices that are easier.

I will not put the whole list here, but I am sure you can come up with a few dozen :).

Latz, SB

Score: 0

By mocha

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 7:57 PM

Nokia has been doing "full web" on their s60 devices for over a year. For Jobs to say the iPhone is the first is laughable. The funny thing is that they accomplished it by putting none other than the Safari (WebKit) engine on their device.

http://www.nokia.com/browser

Apple just did a better job integrating it with a huge screen and touch.

Score: 0

By eoswald

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 12:54 AM

Completely agreed Mocha. Like I've said, there is not much revolutionary about the iPhone. Clever marketing, yes :)

Score: 0

By mhochman

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 8:42 AM

The same could be said for the iPod, it was nothing new, but apple was able to make it slick and hip, creating a buzz around it,

There are still better players out there than the iPod, but iPod is the buzz word because apple these days is execelent at marketing and creating a buzz.

we've had several customers come in with iPhones already, they are nifty looking little devices, and for a gadget wh*** like myself, something i'd love to have, but not at the prices they are getting for them, it's simply too expensive.

It's the same with Mac Book Pro's IMHO, i was in the market for a new laptop, i rather like the new Mac's, so i looked into a macbook pro, and a dell, for a comperable machine, the dell was $1500, the Macbook was $3600, and the dell had better graphics (both video card and monitor) and more memory. Apple products, while very nice, are still too costly, and the price is artificially inflated IMHO. but guess what, people still buy it.

It's all in how you spin it, and Apple has gotten very good at spinning things.

Score: 0

By tnculp

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 4:40 PM

2 words: Picsel Browser

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 5:02 PM

Nice product. They could use two words though...

"Marketing Director"

Score: 0

By sites.web.pt

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 4:32 PM

Opera Mini does the job! In the USA, in Portugal, in China, in the Seychelles, in Cuba; everywhere today, not in the future!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 5:01 PM

Opera Mini arguably does a better job (than .mobi), but requires Java and does not work on many popular phones such as the Samsung Blackjack.

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

posted Jul 9, 2007 - 4:48 AM

"but requires Java and does not work on many popular phones such as the Samsung Blackjack."

Safari requires an iPhone and does not work on any phones (bar one).

Personally, I think that's worse.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 3:48 PM

One of my employees bought one and brought it in today.

Although I still hold to my belief that it is eon's behind other smart-phones in terms of capability, the interface, usability, and novelty of the item itself screams good design.

In the short time I played around with it, I set up the WiFi connection (it can access non-broadcasting SSID WPA2 networks, which, frankly, surprised me), hopped on Google and did a search of my home phone, hit the map link and zero'd in on my house. Browsing the web, *any* form of typing, moving the screen around is *insanely* easy.

You're right Nate, they massacred the .mobi web. There's no need for it on this device. If other companies follow suit, there will be no need for it period.

I was also able to play around a bit with the camera (decent), music (The "album shuffle" reminded me of browsing through an old record store, but was basically useless), and some of the other functionality (weather, maps, etc).

All in all, If I could get one that could operate all of those features mentioned above without needing a "service plan" (I.e., via wifi), I'd jump on it. As it stands, the requirement of AT&T and a 2 year contract will actually be keeping me from it.

Too bad. The interface blew me away (as Apple's interfaces usually do), but the requirements/restrictions are too much for me to accept (which is what usually keeps me from Apple products anyway)...

...at least they're consistent. Hopefully iPhone 2.0 won't be weighed down by such requirements.

Score: 1

By methuselah

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 8:50 PM

I don't think the mobile web is dead...in fact, I think it still has a good future. While the download speed of that WiFi might be decent, if you're trying to view a website on a phone that uses the equivalent of dialup, you want limited transfers. And if you try to view a webpage on a small phone, you can't view a webpage unless you either scroll a lot from side to side, or have a microscope. As small phones will always be popular, there will still be a need. But yes, if you've got the bandwidth and the screen size, not needed. My new phone comes with the "Blazer" browser, version 4.5, (it's a Palm phone) and uses Sprint's wireless data network. So far it's been quite nice at my house, and I had weak signals on my old phone.

Score: 0

By Realist

posted Jul 7, 2007 - 12:02 AM

I have to completely agree with PC Tool. I'm a Windows person through and through but my friend bought an iPhone and even with it's Apple/ATT lock in limitations it's absolutely astounding. While I won't be buying one I'm thankful that handset manufactures will be working overtime to catch up. I'm a Verizon customer and went into a Verizon store to "see what's new" today and there is NOTHING that would make me give up my basic phone. ALL of the handsets and features pale by comparison to the iPhone.

Score: 0

By myke

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 3:42 PM

I think that was the point of the iPhone that everyone missed. Even though it was the first thing Steve Jobs said right before he unveiled the iPhone:

Let's take the 10 features people use most on their phones and make them better. Web browsing was one of them.

I've had the iPhone since day 1, and everything from looking up directions to browsing eBay can be done as easily as if I was in front of my computer.

Score: 0

By eoswald

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 3:45 PM

I still disagree that the iPhone changed much at all in the mobile web. Pocket IE could render full pages as well. Yes, it may be not as full featured as "Pocket Safari," but the groundwork for this was laid long before the iPhone.

Score: 0

By auiotour

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 4:28 PM

I have used a SDA, MDA, Dash, and WING to browse mobile web with crappy IE, and 95% of the pages were skew'd or didn't load correctly. my iphone has yet to find a web page it can't display correctly. It does 100x the job.

Score: 0

By nate

edited Jul 6, 2007 - 3:50 PM

Have you ever tried to load a Wikipedia page in Pocket IE?

Unreadable.

Even Microsoft agrees. From Dr. Flake, head of Microsoft Live Labs:

"The majority of today's browsers use a single-column format which dynamically reformats existing pages by repositioning the content to fit in the limited screen size. This essentially 'crushes' the page to fit the small screen. This approach, while an improvement in some cases, generally results in a difficult-to-view page that requires excessive scrolling in order to use the portions of the page the person is trying to reach. And when you see the page, it isn't presented in the way the Web designer intended."

Thankfully, Microsoft is working on a solution with Deepfish.

Score: 0

By rcutnik

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 6:49 PM

"Thankfully, Microsoft is working on a solution with Deepfish." - it seems that iPhone made such project obsolete now. :)

Score: 0

By eoswald

posted Jul 6, 2007 - 3:49 PM

Um, do you know what the "desktop" option in Pocket IE does? Save it, Nate :)

Score: 0

By DraconPern

edited Jul 8, 2007 - 2:25 AM

You must not have used 'desktop' mode too often because I don't know how you can say that with a straight face. It loads webpages like crap even in desktop mode, and I have a 640x480 screen! First, it renders all the fonts too small relative to the graphics so you can hardly read any of it. Second, it doesn't support javascript. Third, it doesn't render layout anywhere what a normal webbrower does. Not even Microsoft's website renders correctly in Pocket IE.

Score: 0

By keir

edited Jul 8, 2007 - 5:34 PM

PocketIE does suck, that's why I've been using NetFront on my PDA for years :) I'll switch to Mozilla's Minimo if it ever stops sucking.

Score: 0

By Harry Nailz

edited Jul 9, 2007 - 3:46 AM

I just want to make a phone call

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

edited Jul 9, 2007 - 4:52 AM

*Sn1gger* (Gotta love the overhappy word filter)

We have a winner!

Score: 0

By keir

posted Jul 9, 2007 - 7:28 AM

I agree! that's all I want to use my phone for, that and text messaging.

Score: 0