Login:
Password:

iTunes may finally get The Beatles

By Tim Conneally, BetaNews

March 10, 2008, 11:52 AM

Update ribbon (small)

6:25 pm EDT March 10, 2008 - In a response to an inquiry by Billboard magazine, a spokesperson for Apple Inc. issued what Woodward or Bernstein might famously call a "non-denial denial" of press reports that Paul McCartney has finally made an arrangement for Beatles digital content on iTunes.

"This is not news nor is it a scoop," reads the entire comment from the spokesperson from Apple Inc., which is the former Apple Computer and not to be confused with Apple Corps, the Beatles' co-owned record label.

By stark contrast, when iTunes landed a contract with Led Zeppelin last October, Apple Inc. was literally beside itself with fanfare.


United Press International posted a report on Saturday stating that a $400 million agreement had been reached between ex-Beatle Paul McCartney and Apple's iTunes over the distribution of The Beatles' back catalog.

Profits made from the deal and subsequent sales will be split between McCartney, Ringo Starr, the estates of George Harrison and John Lennon, Sony, EMI, and pop star Michael Jackson, each of whom owns some form of rights to the songs, be it in publishing, recording, or reproduction.

The Cupertino company and The Beatles' media conglomerate of the same name settled their trademark dispute over "Apple" over a year ago, but both parties denied rumors that settlement terms included releasing songs from The Beatles on iTunes.

Rumors intensified, however, when Paul McCartney's newest solo recording was released to the digital music store, followed soon after by the late John Lennon's body of solo work.

Saturday's announcement still has not received validation from either side, and a statement from iTunes dismisses news reports as "rumor and speculation," so fans must continue to wait for an official announcement.

Add a Comment (17 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By skimore

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 4:43 PM

Who uses iTunes anyways?

Score: 0

By mdotwills

posted Mar 11, 2008 - 1:44 AM

lol me unfortunately. Stupid exclusivity with the iPod. Good thing I don't purchase music online!

Score: 0

By rsx508

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 1:08 PM

I'm struggling to understand (again) how something like this relates to the genre of this web site. Sorry if I missed the memo.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 2:51 PM

Look at the top of the site, what does it say?

BetaNews.

Not "Beta" news; Not Betanews; or even "News abotu Beta's"...

It's meant to imply that it is both a news site, and the place to go to find out about unreleased products.

For an even deeper glance into that meaning, take a look at the window title on the homepage:

"Inside information; Unreleased Products"

Notice the semi-colon?

Don't mean to be snarky about it, but hey, you started it.

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 3:48 PM

Personally, I think it's a sneaky anagram.

Score: 0

By TIM

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 4:54 PM

"Bean Stew?"

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

edited Mar 10, 2008 - 5:26 PM

Heh. That is also good.
Though 'Les Beta' at least has Beta in it, and means 'the beta' in French.

*Edit* D'oh! I see what you did there.

Perhaps 'A New Best', or 'New Beast'.

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 1:10 PM

Apple and iTunes.

Sure, it's a tenuous link, but I've seen worse.

Score: 0

By rsx508

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 1:27 PM

I thought maybe it was a play on spelling. Like Be[a]t[les]+a or something

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

edited Mar 10, 2008 - 3:34 PM

Haha. Like it, like it.

Perhaps an anagram:

Les Beta

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 12:21 PM

Yay for asinine amounts of money being paid for something that should be public domain under sane copyright laws!

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

edited Mar 10, 2008 - 12:40 PM

*Psst* They nearly are now, but don't tell anyone.*

50 years after recording is the UK copyright term currently I believe, though quite what happens after that I'm not entirely sure.

*I think

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 12:45 PM

Their music is, I believe, also covered by US copyright...

...which can be extended indefinitely.

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 12:47 PM

Oh joy.

Well I can have fun here in the UK then, surely?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 1:06 PM

Only if the UK wants to battle the WTO...

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 1:09 PM

Bah humbug.

Score: 0

By Paul Skinner

posted Mar 10, 2008 - 12:10 PM

Hahaha. $400M
They're getting rinsed if this is true.

Score: 0