Google App Speeds Up Web Surfing

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

May 4, 2005, 6:33 PM

Now that it's mastered loading search results in fractions of a second, Google has opened up its massive computing power to the masses with one goal in mind: to speed up Web surfing. The company has released the Google Web Accelerator, which routes browser activity through Google machines to make Web pages load faster.

Google Web Accelerator employs a number of different methods to speed up Web browsing, including caching frequently looked at pages to make them more accessible. Google will only refresh a Web page when it has been updated, saving the user from reloading content when unnecessary.

The application only benefits broadband users, Google says, because it utilizes techniques such as prefetching, which involves downloading a Web page that Web Accelerator assumes will be visited -- such as the top search result -- even if it is not. Google has implemented similar functionality on its Web site for Mozilla Firefox users.

Google admits there are some potential privacy concerns associated with the application. Although it does not handle requests for secure sites, cookies and passwords submitted via an unencrypted Web page, may be temporarily cached by Google. The company has setup a privacy page specific to the new application that outlines what information is collected.

On the client side, Google Web Accelerator uses a cache separate from the Web browser, which it may be emptied at any time. Additionally, acceleration may be disabled for a specific page.

To prove the application does indeed work, Google Web Accelerator breaks down the time it has saved users. The Performance Statistics page lists the number of pages loaded and the time it would have taken without acceleration enabled.

"One mundane time-waster we all contend with, for example, is waiting for web pages to load. The tantalizing promise of a web page is only seconds away. But even on broadband, the wait's too short to do something else - and just long enough to be irritating," says Google engineer Marius Eriksen. "Let's face it, those seconds add up."

Google Web Accelerator, currently in beta, works automatically with Internet Explorer and Firefox on Windows XP and Windows 2000. The application does work with other browsers, but they must be manually configured to use the program for HTTP connections.

Add a Comment (46 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By vinodis

edited May 6, 2005 - 6:09 AM

Seconds do addup.. after 1.5 Days usage , GWA saved 22.3 Minutes till now. So in a Year 3.7 Days!. Plan few holidays with that :)

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 6, 2005 - 12:39 PM

hey.... :( how come it worked better for you? lol

I'm using a cable connection... maybe it saves more time for slower connections?

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 6, 2005 - 2:19 AM

I've been using this for the past two days, and I've saved 21.7 seconds already. At this rate, I will save 1.1 hours per year. Thanks Google!

hmm... I wonder what I'll do with that extra hour...

Score: 0

By bigsexy022870

posted May 5, 2005 - 1:44 PM

What's Next? So far we got toolbar after toolbar for everything under the sun. I don't like the idea of google everywhere on my system. I use it only for searches. And no i don't search thru a toolbar. That would be overkill. If i wanted search access always up and running i would incorp. windows IE address into the windows taskbar which has been an option for years. I'm not about to play into the google scam. They want to do everything and thus replace the entire universe. Get back to your search basics and stay there google.

Score: 0

By microkom

posted May 6, 2005 - 9:27 AM

Hey... if you don't like it, don't use. It's as simple as that.

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

posted May 5, 2005 - 4:00 PM

Don't want to use it? Guess what? You're not forced to. But don't expect Google to "go back to basics". Your opinion, entitled to it as you are, is by far not the majority. Quite a few of us see Google's expansion as a good thing.

Score: 0

By WebWarp

edited May 5, 2005 - 11:43 AM

Comment deleted... again ..??

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted May 5, 2005 - 8:15 AM

I'm trying it on one of my test/development systems... seems to work very well regardless of IE, FF, or Netscape. :)

Score: 0

By Aires

edited May 6, 2005 - 10:07 AM

http://webaccelerator.go...om/support.html#basics7

I'd use it except only thing is that Proxomitron uses a proxy and I can't use both. [shrugs]

Score: 0

By Portal3

posted May 5, 2005 - 4:45 AM

As if Google doesn't get enough info from it's search engine and Gmail. Now it wants to monitor users browsing habits so that they can use it against us for commercial purposes. The "prefetching" method will prove useless to a lot of users who go to large dynamic websites (generating millions of pages with each changing every minute).
An alternative would be to use an application to spread your page loads across multiple computers serving free open proxy on DSL connections. Whether this is legit can be based on "The owner is intelligent enough to be able to setup a proxy and have it open so I'd assume that they know what they're doing."
The only difference is some open proxies may be unreliable (although in comparison to google I doubt it affects the performance).
I admit that Google is providing decent services and does need ads to keep running (for the next thousand years) but Privacy is becoming an issue with all these services and the hidden intent.

Score: 0

By digitalzen

edited May 23, 2005 - 3:35 PM

Anyone who even imagines they they have any privacy on the Internet or Web is living in a dream world: read my lips...dream world. If they want you, they've got you, unless you're sending all your traffic with strong encryption, and even that will attract attention eventually. I'd just as soon have Google tracking me and providing superlative services for the privilege. If I get careless, shame on me.

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

edited May 5, 2005 - 10:18 AM

Do you *honestly* believe there is any such thing as *privacy* online? Seriously? If so, you are quite dellusional, at best.

EVREY single ISP in the *world* monitors traffic. If you are online, you *are* being watched. Simple as that. Everything you do, click, download, upload, you name it, is logged.

Is a suprise then, that Google does it too? It's interesting so many people hold these misconceptions about privacy.

The question you should be asking is weather or not you trust the companies your data is being logged by.

Comcast: Giving out personal information without notifying users, and without a court-order to do so. *untrustworthy*

Google: Has yet to do anything remotely more suspicious with accumulated user-data than customize ads you're gonna see anyway with something you *might* actually use. This is done via programs and your data is never actually seen by a human. *trustworthy*

Comcast ran fibre to my neighborhood one and a half years ago. Just for grins, I had a buddy of mine check the line. It was live, and actually being used...fiber to the curb, coax to the building. They've got the tech and bandwidth in place, and have had it there for over a year, to boost speeds and quality beyond anything any other company in this city could do...yet they don't...because they can still make money giving us sh*t speeds and sh*t quality.

Google vastly improves every aspect of the internet they touch. Their products are innovative and intuitive. They've revolutionized searching and are in the process of doing the very same with email. Every chance they get, they are making things better.

Who'd you rather put your trust in?

(I picked comcast because they've been in the news recently, and most of you have probably heard about it. I know they are operating in vastly different markets, but the points concerning privacy and trust are still valid.)

Score: 0

By Portal3

posted May 6, 2005 - 3:37 AM

I never implied that the Internet was private and am dissapointed that you'd infer that from what I wrote. I simply said that Google isn't exactly making your browsing more private. If anything it's less secure. It only makes sense since the probability of your information being private with your ISP is increased when you add 3rd party Internet services that have a policy/disclaimer to use your information how they see fit within accordance to law.
If your ISP is in a country where you'd get away with a fair bit then your going to be taking more of a risk using Google servers situated in various countries where more and more laws are added to what information on you is collected.
Just saying your literally giving out your information to Google and that local law of the countries Google has servers situation could force that information to be handed over the government. They may even be compelled to do so. Ie: plots against a president.

Score: 0

By mrmagoo

posted May 6, 2005 - 2:42 AM

It is illegal to log traffic in Sweden

Score: 0

By Maestr0

posted May 5, 2005 - 8:35 AM

"use it against us"?

What paranoid planet do you live on?

Score: 0

By Portal3

posted May 6, 2005 - 3:43 AM

Well it's definately not used "for" us. If anything the ads slow down web surfing. When I'm looking for a product I expect to find a database with a lot of info on it and images. NOT advertisements all over the page with something they think I "would" want.
With search engines and good websites there's no need for Internet Advertisements. They should be banned for bad Netiquette.

Score: 0

By wincement

edited May 6, 2005 - 12:45 PM

Ummm ok. So how on earth do you expect them to stay in business? If it wasn't for those advertisements, Google wouldn't exist anymore. It's those 'annoying' text ads that allows us to use fantastic services for free. What ISP do you know of that gives you over 2GB of storage space? None; no matter how much you pay for it.

Besides... ALL of the ads are text ads. Unless you're on a dialup connection there is no way you could have a noticeable decrease in browsing speed - and even on a dialup connection that would be iffy.

If you really don't want those ads, then don't use Google. You're free to use or avoid Google services whenever you choose.

Score: 0

By athome

edited May 5, 2005 - 7:03 AM

Isn't that the truth. It all comes down to privacy. Leaving any tracks of site visited on the internet gives the ability to track habits. How will Google protect this information from others? and How often will it be cleaned? Who else, can and will, access the information? Downloading a web page that I may never visit, just because it is in the top 10 - no way. How much of your bandwidth will be used up for this service?

Who do they think they are fooling? Now people will have the entire contents of a website downloaded onto their PC's, whether they want it or not. Another way in which adware and spyware will get into your pc.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted May 5, 2005 - 8:15 AM

So don't use the accelerator and shut up about it if you don't like it or approve of what they're doing.

Do you whiney privacy people sit around with some "Privacy Violation" detector that alerts you when a program or newsgroup post mentions such an issue just so you can pounce on it before people decide they like the product?

Like I said... if you don't like it, don't use it.

Score: 0

By Portal3

edited May 6, 2005 - 3:49 AM

"Install Unix! It's great and secure!" ~ tell that to a newbie and they'll probably end up paying someone to do that. Who cares about the other information you could've told the customer? Your telling them what they want to hear and it sells the product.
Now then. Apply that theory to the publicity of Google Web Accellerator and you'd understand the reason for my comment before.

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 6, 2005 - 2:13 AM

lol.... people are still entitled to their opinions. Take it easy.

Score: 0

By zhatka

posted May 4, 2005 - 9:41 PM

I am just waiting for this.

GoogleOS.

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 6, 2005 - 2:13 AM

That's hillarious. I wonder if that would be free too?

Score: 0

By LinuxIsTheft

posted May 4, 2005 - 9:45 PM

Just hope you aren't at work when you've used this utility and accidently type p**** in the Google search engine when you are looking for cat food and have it *automatically* download the first files (to your work PC) that show up in the search results.

Score: 0

By basiphobe

posted May 5, 2005 - 5:36 PM

Ok, seriously. Who types in "pu**y food" and expects to find non Jenna Jameson sites?

Score: 0

By Aires

posted May 5, 2005 - 4:18 AM

So what's the best cat food then, because my cat would like to know.

Score: 0

By Aires

posted May 5, 2005 - 8:16 AM

C'mon, my cat's getting hungry!

Score: 0

By Aires

posted May 5, 2005 - 2:42 PM

My cat is starving now! How can you be so heartless!!

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

posted May 5, 2005 - 4:01 PM

Here ya go...poor kitty:

http://search.ebay.com/cat-food_W0QQfkrZ1QQfromZR8

Score: 0

By Aires

edited May 6, 2005 - 4:22 AM

Beast and Domino are most grateful now. However as it means we'd need to get it shipped over from the States, they will probably die.

Perhaps a visit to the corner shops is preferable afterall.

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

posted May 6, 2005 - 3:20 PM

Perhaps something best not left to google, eh? Of course, you never know... GooBay may be next. (Automagically orders what you need, and 20 other similar items, delivers them all to your inbox, and even drains your bank account for you.)

Score: 0

By VikingBlade

posted May 4, 2005 - 11:57 PM

Though why on earth you would use that context in the first place...
But in any case, it's good for the dial-up users. Don't have to pay that extra money for "faster surfing" from the ISP.

Score: 0

By The-Ancestor

edited May 4, 2005 - 7:00 PM

After having used the web over 9600bps i think broadband is quite fast...

Your browser might run faster...but your pc will run a little slower

speed for memory & cpu....hmmmm

Can't wait for google's takeout toolbar...
you'll be able to order takeout from any dinning place in town... :-)

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 4, 2005 - 6:38 PM

Google's gonna own the world some day.

Score: 0

By basiphobe

posted May 5, 2005 - 5:37 PM

Finally. Then I'd be able to search my house for all that crap I've misplaced.

Score: 0

By normangerman

posted May 4, 2005 - 9:09 PM

Ok, so YOU don't mind Google owning the web someday, but you would hate if MS or AOL did. Typical MS haters. This sin't directed at you by the way!

Score: 0

By athome

posted May 5, 2005 - 8:00 AM

Wait! Let's see:

Outages - a lot of them
Poor customer service
Doesn't ugrade their hardware - service
Pay a great deal for so little

Maybe, just maybe - Comcast is MS(Aaaaaaagh!!)

Score: 0

By drbillbailey

posted May 4, 2005 - 11:11 PM

At least it would be somebody different... for a change...

Score: 0

By wincement

edited May 4, 2005 - 9:48 PM

lol yeah... you'll notice I didn't say whether that was good or bad. I merely stated that Google's gonna own everything eventually. I did that on purpose lol. I'll let everyone else make up their own mind on whether that's good or not.

Score: 0

By httpd.confused

posted May 4, 2005 - 8:55 PM

No, not the world, just a whole lot of private data on anyone careless enough to give it to them.

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

edited May 5, 2005 - 4:09 PM

Have they ever even hinted at doing anything more harmless with it than *gasp* show you ads you're going to see anyway (except maybe tailor them to something you might actually *want*)?

Just because they have the data, doesn't mean they're going to get all evil about it. Every online company you pass through in your browsing collects data about you, like it or not, and Web Accelerators more than anything else, because that's WHAT THEY DO. They speed up access to pages that have been viewed before or are likely to be viewed by caching them.

Google's got this HUGE amount of cached pages, worldwide, from their search pages. This would be a natural extension. They have the ability to offer this service, that a LOT of people pay for, for free, and you're whining because...you *think* at some point they *could* do something nasty with your info???

Better hop offline now, you're ISP *is* gathering data about you..they must be evil.

Score: 0

By Diamhair

posted May 5, 2005 - 8:01 AM

Who cares if Google sees what sites you're browsing? Does anyone here actually think the internet is a safe haven for privacy?

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 4, 2005 - 9:49 PM

pretty much

Score: 0

By chaval

posted May 5, 2005 - 4:54 PM

Is a matter of size it seems; they developed a FREE search engine (yes, most are free I know), they gave you a FREE mail service with huge amount of space, they now give you a FREE tool to speed your conexion and you argue about privacy stuff. Just switch off the accelerator whenever you want (2 clicks away) and stop crying.

Score: 0

By wincement

posted May 6, 2005 - 2:16 AM

lol I'm not crying. In fact, I'm using the Accelerator. I could care less if Google knows about the 5 bajillion tech sites I go to. They would be pretty boring to most people anyway lol.

Score: 0

By PhoenixPath

posted May 6, 2005 - 3:22 PM

Dead on. I shut it off to do my banking, but other than that, they can snoop all they want... not that I think anyone is actually looking at the logs.

Score: 0