New Blu-ray Features Freeze Older Players; Updates Coming

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

October 5, 2007, 2:40 PM

With the next wave of interactive features having been added to 20th Century-Fox's latest Blu-Ray Disc releases, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer and The Day After Tomorrow, there was always a certain level of anticipation that some existing Blu-ray consoles would have trouble, especially the first-generation editions. Surprisingly, it's the second generation which is seeing some early problems, with reports from owners of Samsung's BD-P1200 that they can't play either of these titles.

"You know, this really sucks...how much did we pay for the freaking things?" asked one AVS Forum member on Tuesday. "It's bad enough you have to choose sides to play certain movies, but now some don't even work."

Reports from other AVS Forum users show many BD-P1200s don't play the F4 sequel at all, while earlier first-generation BD-P1000 models valiantly make the attempt - taking forever to load and sputtering generally through the first half-hour of playback, before freezing. Owners of LG's original dual-format BH-100 console also report no playback, but its interactivity support was always known to be lacking anyway, especially for HD DVD.

While some Sony PlayStation 3 owners have also reported problems, expert owners point the latest system firmware already available should correct them.

In a statement yesterday to Video Business, Fox' senior VP of communications, Steve Feldstein, acknowledged the issue but said the solution rests with the hardware manufacturers. Feldstein urged that console owners lobby those companies, implying some kind of mass movement.

In anticipation of such movement, apparently, both affected manufacturers are acting. Spokespersons for both LG and Samsung told Hi-Def Digest they would have firmware fixes within the next few weeks, while some Samsung owners report being told by its customer support personnel a fix may be available next week, though at least one other Samsung owner was told the company had no absolute timetable.

Users of Cyberlink's PowerDVD player for Windows have also reported problems with these titles, and have been advised to upgrade their software. However as of today, many of those users remain perplexed.

What exactly is the problem, and could it become widespread? The initial lack of reports from any other Blu-ray brand appear hopeful, though there may yet be implementation problems which manufacturers may need to take into account.

While some expert owners at first suspected Blu-ray's BDMV authoring mode, which has advanced features such as overlaid menus and alternate audio tracks, suspicion now centers on Fox's implementation of Blu-ray's BD-J interactivity layer and its BD+ copy protection - specifically, on how both may be used together.

Although both categories have always been part of the Blu-ray specification, they have actually been evolving while the first generation of high-def discs were already being sold, and the first-generation consoles being distributed.

Supposedly, if a later generation disc with BD+ protection was to be inserted in a console with earlier-generation support or no support, or that needed to have a firmware upgrade to support it, the older firmware would recognize that fact and warn the owner in plain English on screen. That's not what's happening in any of the cases reported to user forums.

While that would appear to cast the spotlight on BD-J as the likely culprit, some PowerDVD users who have updated their software as advised and who still have problems are suspecting their BD-ROM drives. Meanwhile, many users of the very first Blu-ray players made available early last year report no problems whatsoever with these or any other titles.

As one member of the Hi-Def Forum put it, "I have no idea how these AACS/BD+ thingies work...Why should I? As a customer, I just want a working product!"

Add a Comment (90 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By Hocuspokus

posted Oct 9, 2007 - 8:34 AM

This is only the start of it.

First 2 BD+ titles, both are a problem.

Score: 0

By ingram091

edited Oct 9, 2007 - 2:16 AM

Hate to say it but TOLD YOU...

An Update may fix them. lets hope. But I have stopped purchasing and BluRays or HD-dvds. As far as I am concerned this is the 3rd or 4th nail it their formats coffin... Until there is a universal HD format that is much much more affordable then the $400-$1200 machines they have today, and they decide on some standard that will not cripple your machine every new release... I want nothing to do with HD BR anything anymore and would recommend NO ONE else do it either... Simpliy because that is the only language these companies understand when it comes to Consumers demanding change from the industry... Loss of sales is the only language they listen too...

I fully encourage people continue on the only proven product any of them has managed to make in decades now. DVDs. Its a quality product that requires equipment that is very very affordable, and its format standard do not change every few months requiring updates to firmware... Add to that finally that DVDs are extermly cheap to purchase and they are available EVERYWHERE. Sorry, but as far as I am concerned DVDs will continue to be the quality product for decades to come. If you want HD emulation, IDK why but if you do just get an upscaler... Its not perfect but It should be enough for the HD fanatics types in my opinion...

Score: 0

By mano1192

posted Oct 8, 2007 - 12:03 AM

Wow these threads never cease to bring out a flame war about consoles. I just wanted to add that the day after tomorrow works fine on my PS3, and havent tried F4 cause that movie blows!

Ive said it before, every BR Ive played, and almost all of them since Im a netflix wh***, all work in the PS3. If moveis stop working in that, Ill be throwing my PS3 through a window at sonys corporate HQ! But Im sure this is just another fimware easy update that everyone just enjoys arguing over for no reason.

Score: 0

By shicaca

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 8:55 PM

I'm reminded again of why I freaking hate Sony.

*here's to hoping they file for bankruptcy soon*

Score: 0

By Ramonster

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 5:08 PM

Those Americans can keep their bloody BluRay, the rest of the world is better off with the simpler, region free and non-mandatory encrypted HD-DVD.

The more DRM crap used, the more problems arise, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out..

DVD has broken encryption and still sells in the millions a year..

I hear BluRay is better? Size wise maybe, but you don't need that space for a decent HD movie.

The movie 300 in 1080p with DTS is 10.1GB so 5GB left for advertisement (or better: 15GB space for advertisement on a single sided BluRay, hurray!..)

My Dvico Tvix plays these HD rips with a loading time of 5 seconds btw ;-)

Score: 0

By pitdingo

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 8:29 AM

LOL. you make it sound like HD-DVD does not use DRM. No content provider has released anything without DRM on either format.

DRM sucks and should be removed on both formats, and should be excluded from any future format.

Score: 0

By Hocuspokus

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 10:39 AM

"you make it sound like HD-DVD does not use DRM"

- ....and you constantly trot out this line as if HD DVD & Blu-ray have similar or identical DRM.

They don't. You know (by now) they don't.

Blu-ray has far more so-called 'security' (ie DRM) built-in than HD DVD.
Both in terms of hardware and software from watermarking to BD+.

You've had this pointed out to you several times.......so how come you keep turning up & spreading this lying BS?

Score: 0

By pitdingo

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 8:20 PM

what are you talking about?

Do Blu-Ray and HD-DVD both have DRM? Yes
Is all content released on both DRM'd? Yes
Does all DRM suck? Yes
Should both formats be free of DRM? Yes

Now, what exactly am I "lying" about?

Score: 0

By siryak

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 9:32 PM

All he was saying is that HD-DVD's DRM is the lesser of the 2 evils. Blu-Ray's has potential to suck even more considering they have patents to DRM that can lock the disc to a specific player.

Score: 0

By Joey Deacon

posted Oct 15, 2007 - 10:04 AM

" they have patents to DRM that can lock the disc to a specific player."

LOL, do you know anything, or are you a total idiot?

To be able to lock a disk to a player, several things need to be inplace.

1/ each disk needs to be unique (serial number) AND the player needs some form of non volatile memory to store the disc serial numbers.

OR

2/ the disks needs writable areas on them, for the players to write their serial number.

Neither of these conditions are true, and are even part of BD+ spec. They are a patent nothing else. Merely a bullet in HD DVD FUD gun.

Score: 0

By Hocuspokus

posted Oct 8, 2007 - 2:03 PM

"HD-DVD's DRM is the lesser of the 2 evils. Blu-Ray's has potential to suck even more considering they have patents to DRM that can lock the disc to a specific player. "

- Precisely.

You see?

The guys full of it, same BS every time he shows up on the DRM matter.

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 7:37 PM

He doesnt say that they are similar or identical.
HD DVD has DRM as everyone knows also. Blu-ray just has a less appealing one thats causing a few hickups here and there.
So how can he be lying and spreading bs?

Score: 0

By Hocuspokus

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 7:39 PM

"how can he be lying and spreading bs?"

- Because his tactic is always the same.

If someone mentions BD+ or watermarking he invariably ignores that and instantly refers to them both having AACS as if they are both the same.

He's been at it for months, always the same BS, no matter how often the truth is pointed out.

IMO that's lying and it's pure BS.

Score: 0

By timatl

posted Oct 8, 2007 - 10:57 AM

Hocuspokus, you need some help dude. It is not that serious? You need release some pressure, try your wife, girlfriend, stranger at the bar or some HD DVD porn.

Score: 0

By Hocuspokus

edited Oct 8, 2007 - 2:02 PM

"Hocuspokus, you need some help dude."

- Yeah, a few moments comment is so weird, eh?

"It is not that serious?"

- If you have no interest in a/v and computer tech then wtf are you doing here at all?

If you don't care about being lied to or the implications of what they are up to then then good for you.

Others strongly disagree.

"You need release some pressure, try your wife, girlfriend, stranger at the bar or some HD DVD porn."

- My wife's fine thanks.

But what a give-away.....I'll leave the porno fixation to the likes of yourself.
Knock yourself out.

Score: 0

By mdotwills

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 11:32 PM

Thats what happens when you add copy protection!

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 10:45 PM

BWAAAHAHAHAHAAHAAHHAAH!!!!!!!

Let's see the propaganda spin machine talk his way out of this one.

The fact is BD is unfinished and this just shows that there is no standardization of specs from one machine to another. It's a poorly executed format that could have been great if they waited until is was finished to release it.

Score: 0

By Mystiqq

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 1:37 PM

Its fun to be first!

Score: 0

By GeneralLeoFF

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 11:28 AM

My first console DVD player started to fail when studios started adding RPC region protection. I'm sure many of you experienced it as well. It wasn't that big a deal and didn't take long for firmware updates to resolve it. This is just round two is all.

Glad to see most comments are being mature about it.

Score: 0

By The_One

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 4:45 AM

So in summary:

2 titles on Blue-ray take a couple of minutes to boot, until the fixed firmware is released.

Every title on HD DVD takes 2 minutes to boot.

LOL

Score: 0

By plague201

edited Oct 8, 2007 - 1:13 PM

Whoa 2 minutes, wasn't that a year ago? Please try to keep up with the times. My HD-DVD player doesn't take any longer than 10 seconds to get me going.

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 1:55 PM

Wrong.

Score: 0

By Hocuspokus

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 10:40 AM

"2 titles on Blue-ray take a couple of minutes to boot"

- ....and it's only just begun.

More titles = more problems.

We'll all be hearing about it soon enough.

Score: 0

By pridewalker

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 6:40 PM

What are you on about?

From HDTVexpert: "First off, the HD-A2 boots up a lot faster than its predecessor. From the time I pushed the power switch until the HD DVD logo appeared, I measured all of 30 seconds. That’s not much to write home about when compared to standard (red laser) DVD players, but it’s almost ½ the time the HD-A1 required.

Pop an HD DVD disc in, and you’ll be ready to play in 10-11 seconds, representing a reduction in wait time of 66%..."

So by doing some simple math using this reviewers numbers, we have a total of 41 secs. from power on until the start of the movie.

Besides, it's more than just 2 BR discs that take a couple of minutes to boot (or did you miss the video showing how long it took Pirates of the Caribbean to load...never mind to get the Liar's Dice game onscreen?)

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 3:23 PM

"So in summary:

2 titles on Blue-ray take a couple of minutes to boot, until the fixed firmware is released.

Every title on HD DVD takes 2 minutes to boot."

Sounds like Davey is pissed.

Score: 0

By The_One

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 3:39 PM

Sorry to shatter your illusion that everyone that disagrees with you must be Dave.

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 7:27 PM

You're right, Steve... er, Benjamin... eh, whatever.

If you chose just one name to post under, maybe people would start treating you differently and actually respect what you had to say, though we may not always agree.

How can anyone be expected to take anything you say seriously when you have serious identity issues? When you decide who you want to be, you let us know...

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 9:50 PM

Thank you, I'm getting tired of saying it and it's so obvious.

Here's a little hint. All BD fanboys jump in on every story having to do with this format war.

When we don't see you log in as DaveBG, it's Steve Austin, and when neither one of those are in the post, then it's pitdingo.

You've eeven gotten to the point where you've almost given them all a seperate identity, but I'm a lot smarter than you and I can spot your BS any day of the week.

You are the only one who gets upset over this garbage.

Dork.

Score: 0

By yountmj

edited Oct 8, 2007 - 12:15 AM

I just wish Ed, Nate, Scott... any one of the BetaNews staff would simply clear the air and say that without a doubt yes, those user names were indeed registered from and make regular posts from the same logged IP address.

"Steve" and "Benjamin" already proved they were the same individual in another thread (even though it was already known by anyone with half a brain). Not sure if you noticed that. Look about half-way down:

http://www.betanews.com/...n_First_Week/1191510017

It's a childish game that I'm getting rather tired of dealing with. Regular trouble-makers and users who cause friction with the other members of a forum are suspended / banned from other sites all the time after adequate warning. I'm not certain why the BN staff are not more pro-active at dealing with these children, but I'm sure they have their reasons.

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 12:39 PM

It's a fact.

Score: 0

By lvthunder

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 1:28 AM

So let me get this straight. Fox puts out a couple blu-ray discs that are obviously different then any of the other discs they have made and they didn't even bother to test them on the players. Wow. I mean there can't be more then like 20 blu-ray players out yet. That's pitiful.

Although if the discs where made to the blu-ray specs why weren't these defects found in the blu-ray certification testing.

If I were the heads of the BDA and Fox someone would be fired.

Score: 0

By The_One

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 4:46 AM

"If I were the heads of the BDA and Fox someone would be fired."

Because Samsung and LG messed up?

http://www.highdefdigest..._Playback_Problems/1042

Score: 0

By lvthunder

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 5:16 PM

Yes the BDA and Fox. The BDA for certifying the Samsung and LG players that clearly don't meet the BD specs. Fox for using new technology on these discs without testing them with all the players. It's not like there are hundreds of BD players around.

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 1:59 PM

Maybe everyone should have been advised of new keys on the disks too. I don't think the general public will like having issues with their blo-ray player each time the studios decide to add new keys for playback. Operation screw the consumer, he can't play it so therefore he can not copy it. Priceless.

Score: 0

By eoswald

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 1:14 PM

Well, this is what you get when you don't have a SINGLE standard that all discs/players must meet at a minimum. Like it or not, that is a big positive for HD DVD -- the discs will work/play the same in EVERY player because of it.

Score: 0

By ladylust

edited Oct 5, 2007 - 11:17 PM

...but but but Blu-Ray is the BEST! What happened baby?

LOL no wonder Paramount and Dreamworks left, you can't even get your movies to work.

I hear setting your Blu-Ray discs on fire helps with this problem. Also a sledge hammer to the player and the purchase of a new HD-DVD player helps.

GO HD-DVD! At-least our s*** works!

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 11:00 PM

A firmware update will most likely fix this, but the fact is people SHOULDNT have to apply one. If anything its a bloody movie player, that plays movies regardless. Specs should have been completed before release so nothing like this could come up
I get the feeling this is only the beginning

Score: 0

By Hocuspokus

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 8:58 PM

Welcome to the start of the BD+ troubles.

Don't say there weren't those of us warning about this being a certainty.

Score: 0

By Joey Deacon

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 6:06 AM

The irony is however, BD+ is what will fin the format war. Studios will go with the most secure format, regardless of wether consumers like it or not.

Having a player with lax DRM like ACCS+ is a only a good thing, if you have studios releasing movies on it.

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 9:50 PM

OK Dave.

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 10:59 AM

Yes, but first they have to prove that it works.

It ultimately does not matter what encryption or watermarking system is used... it will be broken eventually. Time and time again, very resourceful individuals break those systems almost effortlessly. All it really takes (as has been shown in the past numerous times) is one industry insider or manufacturer to slip up.

Long thought to be impervious to duplication due to the watermarking system, the high-resolution MLP-encoded tracks on DVD-Audio discs are now able to be ripped.

Score: 0

By timatl

posted Oct 8, 2007 - 11:07 AM

i agree with this comment completely. its only a matter of time.

Score: 0

By SlapShot

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 9:16 AM

yup they will fin cause they won't win :)

Score: 0

By plague201

edited Oct 5, 2007 - 8:43 PM

HAHAHAHAHA!!!

Oh man... first they PURPOSELY take out backwards compatibility from the PS3, and now this. These are too many blows in 1 day. Perhaps they should've tested everything first before rushing it? Oh wait never mind, only Microsoft does that, I forgot Stevy...

You know if blu-ray keeps this up, I might get too bored of slapping my favorite b!tch around (Stevy) that I might have to take up a new hobby.

Score: 0

By Joey Deacon

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 6:12 AM

Your opinion is worthless anyway.

A quick seach on Google shows you claiming the PS3 will be unreliable, and we can "quote you on that". The other clueless idiots are also there claiming the same, to somehow make the 360 relibility issues somehow "better".

http://www.betanews.com/...ay_PS3_Sales/1161963296

Score: 0

By plague201

edited Oct 8, 2007 - 1:08 PM

Don't be bitter just because Sony is the only manufacturer REMOVING parts instead of adding. Sony is screwing up the PS3 so bad that I wouldn't be surprised if by this time next year all thats left is a blu-ray player.

As for these blu-ray movies not working, like Hollywood has stated countless of times: Sony should've finished the specs on that blu-ray garbage. God forbid they actually get some QA engineers on the payroll.

Oh but I forgot, only Microsoft rushes products , right?

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 12:40 PM

Hey look it's Dave.

Score: 0

By terminalx

edited Oct 6, 2007 - 2:01 PM

Well lets see judging on Sony's history with consoles, (ps1 and ps2) with issues that were never resolved, the laser and skipping still occurs on revision 15? 17? of the ps2. a quick google search will show you that.

Its safe to say the ps3 could have the same problems, won't know until there are actually games.

Microsoft may have messed up but at least they are backing it with a 3 yr warranty for the rrod. Sony, flat out denied there was any problems and had little to zero advertisement about the disk read errors being fixed. You could get it fixed at one point but depending on who you talked to. I spoke with 7 different people before I finally got one to admit there are problems.

Oh, and YOUR opinion is worthless anyway, fanboy.

Score: 0

By The_One

edited Oct 7, 2007 - 3:01 AM

Microsoft lied about their problems for 18 months, and only got caught when everyone dumped their stocks in the 360 division.

I don't beleieve there are stil idiots out there that thinks the PS3 does not have games. It's got plenty, and certainly enough units out there in use to gague reliability.

The PS1/PS2 problems are very small compared to 360 problems. Playstation have over 200 million consoles out there, of course Google will bring up problems. Even a million fauly PS2 consoles, is less than 1% of production. Compare that to 30% and rising of failed 360's It's likely to reach 90% eventually.

Score: 0

By yountmj

edited Oct 7, 2007 - 7:46 PM

The number of consoles sold is a tad misleading, wouldn't you say?

Consoles purchased as a replacement for an existing non-working one should not count as an individual new console sale that gets counted towards total consoles sold to date. If you think it should, it speaks volumes about your opinion of their business practices.

Your opinion about Microsoft lying and dumped stocks is just that... an opinion, not based on any facts that I have seen. Still, amusing...

Nevertheless, Microsoft will have their problems with the Xbox 360 resolved with one hardware revision (the first of such since launch). Sony couldn't get it right after 15 revisions with the PS2... and they were even nice enough to give us a choice of colors this time around with it. For those who are tired of looking at a dead black PS2, they can have a silver one.

Oh, and I simply refuse to believe that PS3's are getting enough use to properly gauge reliability yet.

Score: 0

By terminalx

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 3:00 PM

Hm well I bought three ps2 two of them failed (Disk read errors) and Sony wanted $100 for me to pay shipping there and back AND pay for parts.

The other one I bought a broken one off of ebay after digging around on the internet found articles stating the disk read error problem I was having. Called Sony several times, until someone finally admitted there was a problem (7 in total) So my broken ps2 I bought off ebay for 15 bucks got fixed for the cost of shipping it there. One just had a an accident with an ex.

Only 18 months? Sony has been lying about it for 7 years.

Hell, go to their website and they tell you clean the disk, there is no mention of a possible faulty laser or defective drive.

Since people are still reporting problems with their ps2 (the slim-lines no less) hate to break it to you but its far more then a million.

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 1:42 PM

What a turd you dropped there. There reason there are 200 million PS2's out there can also be an inflated number from people buying multiple systems. I had more than a couple fail and it was more easier to buy a new one then to get it fixed. I would like you to prove that is is less than 1%. What a pile of crap. Like its been stated before if there was no issue with the PS2 there would not have been a lawsuit about it. Get a clue. There are games for the PS3 is a reaching. There may be but they too are turds. Q-bert is cool though.

Score: 0

By Joey Deacon

posted Oct 15, 2007 - 10:07 AM

By the same rule then, surely that means Microsoft have only sold 7 Million Xbox 360s then.

LOL, PS3 has almost caught up with 360 sales folks. SGD has just told us so!

Score: 0

By SlapShot

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 9:16 AM

ok joey, or is it steve, or is it ben ?

Score: 0

By WeezulDK

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 5:24 PM

This is why any one HD disc format adoption is a joke right now.

If you ask me, it all smacks of the old "DivX" dvd format.

You would think that people would learn after the disaster that was "DivX" to not invest in DRM-laden formats that are anti-consumer.

We'd have a decent HD format adopted by now if it weren't for the greed of Hollywood and their love affair with DRM.

Score: 0

By NULLedge

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:11 PM

this firmware seems... soft

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:23 PM

Seems like an extra-firmware is needed for this problem. :)

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Oct 7, 2007 - 1:43 PM

Then the next run of movies will use new keys and an other fix will be needed. The general public will not stand for that.

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 5:14 PM

Does Pfizer or Eli Lilly make a pill for this?

Score: 0

By pitdingo

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:56 PM

have to wait and see if a firmware patch fixes this.

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:25 PM

Wait for it...

*winces anxiously with anticipation of the oncoming BS-fest from the BD Smurfs on how this is not a bad thing*

Score: 0

By nate

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:20 PM

At least the problem has only affected two really bad movies so far :)

Score: 0

By yountmj

edited Oct 5, 2007 - 3:41 PM

I have seen neither, so I really couldn't say... but regardless of the titles, this is yet another major setback for the "superior" format, and does not bode well for its immediate future.

If Blu-ray had been a complete and mature HD solution from the start (as it should have been, and as HD DVD is), I would definitely consider it to be an attractive option. The BDA just couldn't wait to get their unfinished format to the masses to attempt to offset the market penetration by HD DVD, though (which is understandable, but utterly foolish).

Typically, early adopters always have to assume some type of risk with new technologies. In this ridiculous format war, the only consumers I would apply the label "early adopters" to are ones who have purchased Blu-ray products... not HD DVD.

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:27 PM

I haven't seen F4, but I heard it was junk. As for Day After Tomorrow, while it may not be the best acting ever, its at least an interesting story if you consider what it would be like if it actually happened.

Granted, I don't think you could outrun a cold snap coming at you if a military helicopter couldn't outfly it (Jake G when he runs into the library). Not to mention the fact that the water was like 30 stories high but then when it went by the library it was only a few feet deept. Awesome.

Score: 0

By eoswald

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:37 PM

I liked The Day After Tomorrow. :) Although one movie isn't enough to get me to buy... most of the movies I watch are either available from HD DVD or dual-format.

Either way, i don't really care about next-gen yet. I guess I'm one of THOSE consumers :)

Score: 0

By Real1tyczech

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:19 PM

Obviously the last nail in Blu-Rays coffin.

Silly Sony. They keep attempting new formats...

They should know this rule better than the one about getting involved in land wars in asia.

Score: 0

By Steve Austin

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:00 PM

Really. Considering it affects only a very small percentage of Blu-ray players. (PS3 and several other players are fine with these discs).

Let's not also forget HD-DVD is not without it's problematic discs.

The difference however, is Betanews, "forget" to report those...

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/552

So obviously by your reckoning, the final nail in the HD DVD coffin was back in March.

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 10:40 PM

Children of Men????????????!!!!!!!

That's the best you can come up with? Fantastic 4 was a huge summer blockbuster movie that every BD drone wanted because it was exclusive.

The five people who bought Children of Men on HD-DVD were probably upset.

You are so bad at arguing it's a good thing you're not a lawyer. You really suck at everything. I can't imagine what it feels like for you to look at yourself in the mirror every day and convince yourself that you're not a complete loser and want to live another day.

Score: 0

By kashin

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 10:10 PM

I giggle every time a deluded Sony fanboy uses the phrase "the final nail in the HD DVD coffin" and believe me, it's fairly often. These kids think something is going to go their way, if they wish it hard enough and loud enough across the internet. Unfortunately, most people don't fall for this type of Sony propaganda BS and just makes them giggle, the same as me. Keep bringing that entertainment value Stevey, you always crack me up. It's going to be incredibly awesome to see your comments early next year, after the holiday season numbers have come in. It will be painfully apparent how badly Blu-Ray, the PS3, and Sony in general are doing. I can't wait. :P

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:21 PM

Sorry, but what you're referring to was found to be a batch of badly-pressed discs, as it was very random. Not everyone with the same models of players had issues. After swapping with another copy of the movie, users found that it played just fine on the same device.

http://www.avsforum.com/...showthread.php?t=825964

What is presently being referenced in this article is most likely problems with the Blu-ray specification itself (interactivity layer and copy protection) and BD-ROM drives... not the discs. Read the article.

Again, Blu-ray proves itself to be a flawed and incomplete HD solution not ready for the public.

Score: 0

By Real1tyczech

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:20 PM

No, that's fact. If I were reckoning, I would be saying something like,

Steve Austin was probably ignored as a child and is now acting out in a pitiful attempt to make people notice him, thus garnering him the attention he so desperately needed during his formative years.

Score: 0

By yountmj

edited Oct 5, 2007 - 3:51 PM

...but only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!

By the way, it seems like a fairly big coffin. I'm sure there's room for many more nails for one of their most expensive failures ever. :)

Score: 0

By unistyle

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 12:44 AM

Inconceivable!

Score: 0

By Hollywood__

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 3:25 PM

No more ryhmes and I mean it! ......... anbody want a peanut?

Score: 0

By bobthegoat2001

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 3:53 PM

Ooh, like peanuts, the large salted ones.

Score: 0

By unistyle

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 12:51 AM

But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.

ha. i'm done now.

Score: 0

By Real1tyczech

edited Oct 5, 2007 - 3:46 PM

He lost.

Thus explaining why it is less well known.

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:47 PM

:)

Good call.

Score: 0

By timatl

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:14 PM

go blo-ray

Score: 0

By Jordanr05

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:10 PM

I guess I'm a blue-ray owner since I own a PS3. With that said, I'd be pissed if I just bought these 2 movies and found out they didn't work. The last quote says it all: "As a customer, I just want a working product!"

Score: 0

By Steve Austin

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:00 PM

But these discs work fine in a PS3, so no issue there...

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 4:07 PM

"While some Sony PlayStation 3 owners have also reported problems, expert owners point the latest system firmware already available should correct them."

An "expert owner", I take it, Lost-boy?

Score: 0

By Steve Austin

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 5:14 PM

All other sites reporting this, state PS3 and other units work fine. We already know AVS is infestated with HD DVD fanbots, and it only takes a couple to spew up some nonsense...

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 11:09 PM

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/1035
States lengthy load up times of two minutes
http://www.pocket-lint.c...rt-it-out-blu-ray.phtml
same thing

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=18586
States that you must have the latest firmware update. Thats going to be a issue for some, not a majority though. If you use the playstation network, you wont even notice any problems as you have to update.

How much simplier would this be if the specs had a network connection?
So in short, the ps3 units are fine IF they are updated. Maybe a 2 minute wait time... and other players with a 2 minute wait time
God google is so full of information you know.
Where's your sites?

Score: 0

By Steve Austin

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 3:32 AM

"You will get a warning screen when you load these BDs on the PS3."

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Oct 6, 2007 - 9:36 AM

thanks for confirming what i allready said....

Score: 0

By plague201

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 8:38 PM

(yawn) some links please...

Score: 0

By TomeOne

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 2:57 PM

Oh this will be a fun-filled comment section

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

posted Oct 5, 2007 - 3:18 PM

I know, I was bummed that there are only a few comments so far. I'll check back tonight for some laughs.

Score: 0

By Jordanr05

edited Oct 5, 2007 - 3:09 PM

oh Christ it's going to get ugly real fast.

Score: 0